GamerGate - Autistic MRA manchildren and the twitter feminists who love them

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Rather late but even to this day, the autism of 8Chan /v/ can't just let go of GamerGate. Then again, it's one of the key things to set them apart from 4Chan /v/.

Because somehow, we must tie something in South Africa to a pro-GG game dev. Just some Twitter sperg trying to sperg hard is all, especially when Brad likely to be busy with other Twitter spergings.

Not sure if I should commend their persistence or mock their stubbornness, but it's not like this is getting anywhere, threads are meaningless.
The thread may as well be like any other /v/ thread in where they call each other gay and post pics.
 
Rather late but even to this day, the autism of 8Chan /v/ can't just let go of GamerGate. Then again, it's one of the key things to set them apart from 4Chan /v/.

Most of 8chan /v/ is from the exodus from 4chan /v/ due to goobergrape being banned, so it's not that surprising most of them would be gropers.
 
Most of 8chan /v/ is from the exodus from 4chan /v/ due to goobergrape being banned, so it's not that surprising most of them would be gropers.

Imagine how much less autistic this timeline would be if websites didn't run around banning gropergarble and spreading it to the most hardcore sperg corners. Maybe if people admitted game journalists were shit we wouldn't have put up with dozens of copies of Homer Beoulve running around emailing advertisers and making SJWs freak out, leading to further culture war shenanigans from all sides.
 
Imagine how much less autistic this timeline would be if websites didn't run around banning gropergarble and spreading it to the most hardcore sperg corners. Maybe if people admitted game journalists were shit we wouldn't have put up with dozens of copies of Homer Beoulve running around emailing advertisers and making SJWs freak out, leading to further culture war shenanigans from all sides.
One can imagine a game journalist eating the hat and not wanting to bother with anymore gamergroper tism, instead just wanting to churn out an article and get a paycheck. Meanwhile though, we could still get a Homer Beoulve clone still bitching about something and an SJW trying to white knight some game journalist just because someone found an article to be shit.

Fuck it, autistic as this timeline is, we may as well keep laughing at all the speds that can't let go a dead hashtag.
 
zqla.jpg
 
Did you see that motherfucker politely ask Zoe a question?!? That doesn't look like listening and believing!

But why are you posting tweets from december?
 
Question about this thread.
If you see someone in 2018 still using the GamerGate hashtag everytime they talk how do you tell them to stop beating the skeleton of a beaten dead horse
 
Question about this thread.
If you see someone in 2018 still using the GamerGate hashtag everytime they talk how do you tell them to stop beating the skeleton of a beaten dead horse

You don't.

Clearly they're too far gone to be reasoned with.
 
Imagine how much less autistic this timeline would be if websites didn't run around banning gropergarble and spreading it to the most hardcore sperg corners. Maybe if people admitted game journalists were shit we wouldn't have put up with dozens of copies of Homer Beoulve running around emailing advertisers and making SJWs freak out, leading to further culture war shenanigans from all sides.

Sadly, I can tell you something from my research on it: Even if GG never happened, something like it going down was an inevitability, and the second it did, it would have been tamped down on just as hard. Ignore for a moment that the marching orders on GG were out before GG even happened (since the response was based on the same fucking tactic Anita Sarkeesian mainlined), and that countless pre-existing links between the various "big names" in GG opposition were already well-entrenched; if during the initial outbreak, those involved had simply admitted wrongdoing and owned up to it, that probably would have forestalled a GG-type event for another few years.

Note I said "forestalled," and not "prevented."

GG as a whole was a gigantic pressure-release for something that had been building up online for over a decade. From Anita claiming to have been harassed and people responding by donating to her en masse (even as numerous journos with known ties to her sang her praises and described her as a problem gamers themselves created) to the explosion of pretentious e-hipster shit pushed by Polygon and Kotaku that they claimed that we, the plebs, just weren't smart enough to appreciate, there was dozens of cases of the people involved with this sort of shit overreaching, often badly, and then responding by attacking the customerbase.

Assuming GG never happened, things would have continued to build up over time, and another, likely more Autistic event, would have caused a similar incident to erupt instead. The difference is that we would have had several more years of echo-chambering and buildup, which meant it would have been much worse for all involved and probably would have taken three to four times longer to run its course (as opposed to GG, which burned out in a little over a year). All estimations are that the situation would have been way worse, those who caused GG would have been even more entrenched, and you'd have a lot more people imitating Homer. Which would mean more content for us, on balance, but also that things would have been that much more insufferable as a result.

Imagine GG with even more Autism.
That prospect should fucking terrify you, and is a reason that we should be thankful this panned out how it has.
 
Question about this thread.
If you see someone in 2018 still using the GamerGate hashtag everytime they talk how do you tell them to stop beating the skeleton of a beaten dead horse
If you try to inform them that GamerGate has been dead for years, they 100% come back with "uh uh UH, you said GamerGate, that means we're still a thing!" It's one of those "the only winning move is not to play" situations.
 
I tried to read that article. I really did. But I think if I roll my eyes one more time today they will actually fall out, so I had to stop.

So I'm going to posit a counter article.

Hate and outrage culture, as exemplified by Anti-Gamer Gate has driven america to new levels of partisanship.

It's easy to see almost anywhere you go that there is a myopia of opinion. People are literally physically attacking other people for having the "wrong opinions". We've seen it get worse and worse, but you might wonder how it got so bad.

Well, back in deuce-aught-dickety-five, a bunch of sad internet loser types who read video game review sites for some reason noticed that really shitty games were given wildly inflated reviews. Instead of doing the sensible thing and not reading anymore video game review sites, they decided to investigate why this is. Around the same time, some dude wrote some stuff about a woman who he was dating, who made a shitty game that got awesome reviews, which revealed that several reviewers had undisclosed relationships with her.

When people complained about this, the people running the review sites cynically exploited the recent wave of anti-mysogony to claim this was actually an attack on women. They used their influence to get others to censor dissenting opinions, and once they dominated the main arena of information, claimed victory, but insisted they needed more power to prevent this from happening in the future.

Those who were willing to work around the censorship eventually understood the true story, but the misinformation campaign had broadly worked. On top of this, the Anti-Gamer Gate crowd made sure to keep pushing out troll bait, then when they inevitably got trolled, would claim it as proof of the mysogony they needed to fight.

It's easy to see how this pattern has continued to manifest in our society. Today even basic facts seem to be partisan issues, and a line can clearly be drawn back from where we are now to the root of the Anti-Gamer Gate movement.

Oh shit... I wrote a real article there. That was supposed to be parody, I seem to have gotten carried away and written a much better piece than that CNET one.

I know its a bit late to respond to this but can I say you made a more interesting article than most actual journalists who get pay for it.


If you try to inform them that GamerGate has been dead for years, they 100% come back with "uh uh UH, you said GamerGate, that means we're still a thing!" It's one of those "the only winning move is not to play" situations.

I just see it as people who are desperate trying to find a good "cause" to fight for even though the problem is mostly gone or trying to stay relevant and want attention.
 
What even was GamerGate?

That time a few people online realized they could spin low-effort trolling into making them heroic martyrs for progressiveness, at least within the "words are oppressive and don't ever question a victim" dogma of progressivism itself, and once they realized they had the Midas touch, they greedily antagonized everyone because whoever got the most hate was the most virtuous person in that system.

After a whirlwind year of running wild, denouncing everyone and anyone who dared disagree, making it seem like they were forced in hiding from Alt-Right hit squads while, paradoxically attending every con and congressional committee that had called them up to speak (to catch some of that positive lightning too), getting drunk on every puff piece the worthless MSM wrote to sing their praises, after all of that, they stopped to catch a breath, looked around, and realized something was wrong.

Very wrong.

Everyone now hated them, for real, their social media footprint had turned toxic with drama to the point nobody outside KIA or the Washington Post on a slow day wanted to talk to them, game developers wouldn't touch them with a 10 foot ePole, and they were suddenly feeling very lonely and shut out of their groups.

And all those new allies they'd made? Poof! gone.... progressivism had moved on to the next fresh outrage (it has to feed itself too, once gamers were sufficiently riled up so that all the ones who were going to take the bait had, it could do no more, and was off to ruin comic books)

That, was Gamergate.
 
Last edited:
That time a few people online realized they could spin low-effort trolling into making them heroic martyrs for progressiveness, at least within the "words are oppressive and don't ever question a victim" dogma of progressivism itself, and once they realized they had the Midas touch, they greedily antagonized everyone because whoever got the most hate was the most virtuous person in that system.

And, after a year of running wild, they looked around and realized everyone now hated them, for real, and had no way to call it back and were suddenly feeling very lonely and shut out of their groups. And all those new allies they'd made? Poof! gone.... progressivism had moved on to the next fresh outrage (it has to feed itself too, once gamers were sufficiently riled up so that all the ones who were going to take the bait had, it could do no more, and was off to ruin comic books)

I mean really
 
Back
Top Bottom