🐱 Gamers will always make something up to get mad about

CatParty
Status
Not open for further replies.
https://theoutline.com/post/2218/gamergate-will-never-die-alt-right-trump


A coalition of people who play video games and also like to yell online is up in arms this week over a 26-minute video of VentureBeat gaming writer Dean Takahashi playing Cuphead, a soon to be released game for Xbox and PC.

The video, which has been viewed more than half a million times since it was uploaded on August 24, has been called “grossly negligent” and “pathetic.” YouTube commenters suggested it would be appropriate for Takahashi to kill himself and wondered if he was “retarded.” It triggered multiple Reddit threads and a slew of YouTube reaction videos including “Venturebeat Can't Cuphead - Games Journalism Fail” and “Dean's Shameful Cuphead Demo Vs Pigeon Intelligence Test.” Gamergater supporter Ian Miles Cheong, formerly a writer for the now defunct Heat Street and now at Tucker Carlson’s Daily Caller, has been tweeting incessantly about the video for five days, most recently after he recruited a 4-year-old to provide commentaryon the video.


“So, there's a lot of people saying I'm not qualified to do my job, and then it escalates to ‘I should go fuck myself,’ ‘you're shit,’ ‘how can you be paid to play games,’ and ‘you should go kill yourself,’” Takahasi told The Outline.“Fortunately, it's never gotten worse than that.”

Takahashi, the lead writer for VentureBeat’s vertical GamesBeat, has worked as a journalist for 25 years. His previous gigs include The Wall Street Journal, where he coveredchip manufacturers like Intel in the 90s, and before that, The Los Angeles Times. He recorded the video that would make make thousands of people mad online at Gamescom, the gaming trade show in Germany. His crime? He played the game poorly, struggling to complete the tutorial and then dying repeatedly once he got into the actual game. VentureBeat titled the video, “Cuphead gameplay: Dean embarrasses himself for 26 minutes.” Takahashi wrote, “I suck at Cuphead. Let’s get this out of the way,” and pokes fun at himself during his short review.

The disclaimer didn’t save him.

Cheong’s initial tweet about the video has 12,000 retweets. “Game journalists are incredibly bad at video games,” Cheong seethed. “How do they think they're qualified to write about games?”

Takahashi said after that tweet blew up, “the anger really just sort of grew from that.”

Maybe it’s the ascendency of the alt-right, which has its roots in the Gamergate movement in terms of ideology and online mob mentality. Maybe it’s the fact that Zoe Quinn, Gamergate patient zero, is doing a book tour, prompting the people who harassed her mercilessly throughout 2014 to return in order to trash her Amazon reviews. Whatever the reason, it suddenly feels as if Gamergate never ended. The suspicion of the press is back, the menacing tweets are back; the sanctimonious rhetoric — “it’s about ethics in games journalism!” — used to justify what is essentially cyberbullying is back. Takahashi’s inability to play Cuphead shows that the emperor (games journalists) have no clothes (the ability to play games), which is an indictment of the empire (games journalism and also the mainstream media as a whole). John Bain, also known as Total Biscuit, a guy who makes content about video games on the internet, said the video shows a “harmful level of incompetence.”


Regardless of whether Takahashi is good at video games or good at journalism, it’s rich to suggest that his botched gameplay is harmful. This reflects the delusions of grandeur critical to the Gamergate mindset, where minor and imaginary offenses justify sustained harassment. Despite being the victim of an unhinged mob of ideologues, Takahashi is contrite; he has been patient and conciliatory with his critics. During a podcast in which his VentureBeat colleagues pointed out that his Cuphead demo happened in the middle of a long day, that the bulk of his job is not playing games like this, and that he was doing an interview at the same time, Takahashi said, “Those are excuses for bad game play I think. I would apologize to eveybody because I think they expected more from me and they didn't expect this kind of video as far as the tone goes. What I was thinking, which I've done many times in the past was that this was going to be a funny video as well. It was going to make people laugh. Making fun of myself as a gamer has led to many fun stories for me.” When The Outline asked if the blowup over his Cuphead video made him want to stop writing about games, he said it had dampened his enthusiasm but that at the end of the day he’s “stuck with covering games because I enjoy interviewing people, and I enjoy playing the games they make.”


In case you’ve buried the memory, the genesis of Gamergate was based on lies about the sex life of a female game developer, who allegedly slept with someone who had reviewed her game. The movement snowballed from there, targeting new victims including feminist critic Anita Sarkeesian and games developer Brianna Wu, and picking up advocates like Milo Yiannopoulos, the tech editor for Breitbart who had already made a name for himself as a culture warrior and right-wing internet shock jock. It turned out Gamergate was never about “ethics in gaming journalism” as its adherents claimed, but more about a way for self-identified gamers to release their pent up stress and anxiety on whoever had crossed them that week. Gamergate moves from one inflated faux scandal to the next in the name of “ethics in games journalism” while keeping its sights fixed on its real targets: feminists and those who are part of or interested in the indie games scene. This pattern of escalation has played out repeatedly since then. Pizzagate. The Ghostbusters backlash. Donald Trump.

Now, with Takahashi, Gamergate is returning to the fake controversy of its origins: ethics in video games journalism. The debate is ostensibly, “Should video game journalists be good at video games?” but it’s more like, “Is it OK to unleash all the firepower of an angry mob against a video games journalist who is bad at a video game?” According to Takahashi’s critics, nothing could be more justified. And if the Gamergate pattern continues, his critics will be hungry for their next target soon.
 
I'm not upset. I'm simply pointing out all the flaws in this post and trying to explain things. I know it ended up a wall of text, though. My bad.
You don't need to explain anything. Most people here already agree with everything you've said. Screaming about the SJWs is as autistic as it gets. This isn't Kotaku in Action.

271,301 people, who died of starvation and typhus, according to the Red Cross. And those who starved to death did so because the Allies destroyed German supply vehicles who were delivering food to the concentration camps. Muh six million is a lie.
Also you're a holocaust denier. This will end well for you.
 
You don't need to explain anything. Most people here already agree with everything you've said. Screaming about the SJWs is as autistic as it gets. This isn't Kotaku in Action.


Also you're a holocaust denier. This will end well for you.

I was using "SJW" in its proper context.

Not a denier. I simply don't fall for revisionist bullshit and am skeptical on some aspects of World War II. You think the oligarchy that rules the world wouldn't want to exaggerate or lie about any action taken against them, even when there are people who have had it way worse? It's not like they do it all the time or anything. It's only fun to joke about actually denying it to governments who are stupid and corrupt enough to ban the action. The truth isn't afraid of investigation.
 
Last edited:
The best thing about a CatParty thread is that someone always reveals something incredible about themselves in the course of taking the bait.

Today's catch: a holocaust denier
 
The best thing about a CatParty thread is that someone always reveals something incredible about themselves in the course of taking the bait.

Today's catch: a holocaust denier

Again, not denying. The numbers are inaccurate and there are lots of lies pertaining to World War II, especially against the losing said. Remember that history is written by the victor. World War II started because Europe hated that Germany had created its own interest-free currency, which defied the traditional banking systems, which infuriated bankers and politicians. They used the invasion of Poland as an excuse to start World War II.

Telling the truth can cause you to be hated by some, and that's okay. The only thing the tally doesn't account for is people who died before the Holocaust or did so outside the camps during the Holocaust. But if the Final Solution was a means to exterminate as many political opposers and Jews, and the Red Cross managed to tally these many deaths, then the Nazi regime was really bad at achieving their goal.

There's also the fact that the Nuremberg Trials only took about one-and-a-half hours to try to tally up and explain the deaths of an apparent six million individuals. Anyway, I only made this account to make one thread. I'll go back to lurking soon.
 
Again, not denying. The numbers are inaccurate and there are lots of lies pertaining to World War II, especially against the losing said. Remember that history is written by the victor. World War II started because Europe hated that Germany had created its own interest-free currency, which defied the traditional banking systems, which infuriated bankers and politicians. They used the invasion of Poland as an excuse to start World War II.

Telling the truth can cause you to be hated by some, and that's okay. The only thing the tally doesn't account for is people who died before the Holocaust or did so outside the camps during the Holocaust. But if the Final Solution was a means to exterminate as many political opposers and Jews, and the Red Cross managed to tally these many deaths, then the Nazi regime was really bad at achieving their goal.

There's also the fact that the Nuremberg Trials only took about one-and-a-half hours to try to tally up and explain the deaths of an apparent six million individuals. Anyway, I only made this account to make one thread. I'll go back to lurking soon.
This isn't /pol/ son.
@Null
 
Nah, you'll make another thread before your time here is out - your halal thread.

I literally made this account just to make that specific thread. I don't need to have an account to view the posts, so there's no reason for me to keep this account. Directly dealing with many autists for an extended period of time is unhealthy. So, yeah. Back to occasionally lurking this site soon.
 
I haven't physically facepalmed in years but this tread has made me do it twice.

@Moonman's Son, don't get mad. Making a madpost here is like waving heroin in front of an opiate addict. Please don't so willingly open yourself up to a dogpile.

But I'm not angry. Keep your le quirky gestures of disapproval to yourself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back