Games Journalism General

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
but do all American parties support Palestine or is it just the far left who has a huge Muslim boner?
It's been a leftist cause for a long time, I think part of it is it being opposition to American policy. Remember, the Soviet Union was the first to recognize Israel and support them financially and materially(to keep the musslemen away). They had their reasons for doing that.
When it didn't pan out they switched sides and Israel became the enemy, they then started supporting the surrounding arab states while the US became the chief patron of Israel. Look at the armament during the Six Day War and Yom Kippur war. The ruskies had trainers and instructors down there, feeling pretty high on the hog after the Korean War, Vietnam War and whatever else they were involved in. China also sent weapons. They had underestimated the supreme laziness of arabs and eventually left in disgust, or so I've been told by an old ex-soviet military officer. He said that those people were not like the vietnamese. Look at the size of the forces involved in that conflict, the arabs were immensely incompetent.

In the 60's hardcore leftists from Europe attended pro-palestine workshops that were run by actual, honest to god, Nazis from World War 2. Nothing weird about that. Francois Genoud was a very rich Nazi true believer, held the rights to Hitler's writing and financed the defense of Palestinian terrorists and fucking Klaus Barbie(way better than Klaus Sindy), all helmed by a far-left lawyer! Strange bedfellows, the left, the right and the Nazis.
Here's a good article about it, it starts at page 45.
First section with some highlights.
motherjones1.JPG

In the late 2000's leftist allied themselves with Erdogan and whatever far-right organizations that were supporting Ships to Gaza. Turkish leftists were of course left aghast at this. There's more of course but all of this is off the top of my head.

I think a lot of it is the modern reactionary leftist trying to spite the US by chanting what is essentially a meme.
 
I just want to point out that Call of Duty was or is considered to be one of the most popular games in America, so I found out to be a little hypocritical to think game journalists in IGN, Kotaku and Gamespot are supporting Palestine over Israel.

You actively played a game series that literally support wartime, American patriotism/imperialism and think that supporting terrorist groups to help aid Israel, while throwing rockets and killing children in the process, makes you the good guys?

B632A329-5AE1-45D6-B9AC-ECF2153BD2C4.png

Keep in mind: I’m no prude that wants to say you’re a bad person for thinking that introducing Yuri Bezmenov to Call Of Daty players is a good idea, nor think it should be a bad thing to play the series in current day. It’s just that I find that game journalists delving into partisan politics while then still holding onto to the belief that all forms of video games have politics intersected into one another is just proof that they are in the wrong business.

But I think you guys already knew that.
 
While Gamespot still holds, both IGN and Game Informer quietly withdrew their Palestinian shilling, their articles 404'd. IGN now has a new image in their header linking to their year-old COVID infodump.

1621196961253.png


Kotaku was quick to write about this occurrence, implicitly shaming IGN and Game Informer.

https://archive.is/4gicl
1621197265851.png

Following the most recent set of violent military strikes by the Israel Defense Forces that have leveled entire buildings in Gaza and left over 180 Palestinians dead, IGN posted an article linking to a variety of Palestinian charities and even gave a Palestinian flag prominence in its masthead. Sometime earlier today, all of that content, along with a tweet promoting the post, was removed with no indication as to why or if it will be republished at a later date.

Shortly after the IGN post went live yesterday, IGN Israel shared a statement on social media accounts owned by IGN Israel stating that it condemned the U.S. IGN article and tweet supporting Palestinian charities. At this time it’s unknown if IGN’s parent company, Ziff Davis, demanded this content be removed, or if the content was removed for another reason. As of this writing, the post and tweet remain deleted.

Another outlet that showed support for Palestine and its people was Game Informer. However, its article promoting charities was also removed today. As with IGN, there has been no public indication as to why this post was removed or if it will return.

Kotaku has reached out to IGN and Game Informer inquiring about why this content was pulled.

As Israeli attacks against Palestinian civilians continue, many in the gaming community began to speak up against the violence. While what is happening is not new, this reaction from big outlets, like IGN and GameSpot, was seen as a big deal by many who’d been begging for more news and media coverage. IGN, the biggest gaming news site in the world, was one of the first major outlets to publish a story directly supporting the people of Palestine and various charities that are trying to help the victims of Israel’s ongoing military attacks.
 
It's been a leftist cause for a long time, I think part of it is it being opposition to American policy. Remember, the Soviet Union was the first to recognize Israel and support them financially and materially(to keep the musslemen away). They had their reasons for doing that.
When it didn't pan out they switched sides and Israel became the enemy, they then started supporting the surrounding arab states while the US became the chief patron of Israel. Look at the armament during the Six Day War and Yom Kippur war. The ruskies had trainers and instructors down there, feeling pretty high on the hog after the Korean War, Vietnam War and whatever else they were involved in. China also sent weapons. They had underestimated the supreme laziness of arabs and eventually left in disgust, or so I've been told by an old ex-soviet military officer. He said that those people were not like the vietnamese. Look at the size of the forces involved in that conflict, the arabs were immensely incompetent.

In the 60's hardcore leftists from Europe attended pro-palestine workshops that were run by actual, honest to god, Nazis from World War 2. Nothing weird about that. Francois Genoud was a very rich Nazi true believer, held the rights to Hitler's writing and financed the defense of Palestinian terrorists and fucking Klaus Barbie(way better than Klaus Sindy), all helmed by a far-left lawyer! Strange bedfellows, the left, the right and the Nazis.
Here's a good article about it, it starts at page 45.
First section with some highlights.
View attachment 2175804

In the late 2000's leftist allied themselves with Erdogan and whatever far-right organizations that were supporting Ships to Gaza. Turkish leftists were of course left aghast at this. There's more of course but all of this is off the top of my head.

I think a lot of it is the modern reactionary leftist trying to spite the US by chanting what is essentially a meme.
Yeah... the Russians took it very personally that all of their equipment and doctrine got made a hilarious mockery of by a numerically inferior force trained and equipped along Western lines, and began sending out "Israel bad" marching orders to all their useful idiots in academia and the media. I think they realized deep down that it meant they would have been in deep shit had war with the West broken out.

EDIT: Oh, and the chaser to this little shot, in 1967 the Soviets instituted a new conscription law to deal with their manpower shortages caused by all their dead guys in WW2 not being able to reproduce. Consequences have never been the same.
 
Last edited:
but do all American parties support Palestine or is it just the far left who has a huge Muslim boner?
All american political parties support making fat loads of cash

Biden's cabinet is full of members of Raytheon. Guess who created and maintains the iron dome in israel and needs to supply thousands of missiles now?
They will officially support palestinians just enough to keep the iron dome in use and making them hundreds of millions.
 
Aged Adam Sessler gives me Jim Cramer vibes.

IGN released a reply-locked statement on Twitter apologizing for not giving Israelis a share of sympathy in the conflict, coupled with a repenting donation to Save The Children. Obviously, their game journo peers remain pissed off, as exemplified by the abundant quote tweets.

https://archive.md/IZpIQ
1621270846571.png


According to Kotaku's update to their IGN-targeting article, IGN Africa had the Palestinian shilling article as well. While Google Cache provides evidence that the article did exist and has since been hidden (403'd), it appears that it was created and withdrawn in roughly the same timeframe as the original article, not all done after IGN's "bullshit statement" in some sort of rebellious act as Kotaku suggests.

https://archive.md/zE1iC
1621280203666.png
 
IGN staff is mad

I wonder if signing this letter will backfire and result in any of them getting fired....

Expanding it for visibility here:
1621313987396.png

To the management of J2 Global and Ziff Davis, and the corporate leadership of IGN:

We, the undersigned employees of IGN, are appalled by the recent management decision to subvert our editorial autonomy and remove our post directing aid to the Palestinian civilians currently suffering a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, the West Bank, and Jerusalem.

In our original post, we offered our readers ways to support charities that help injured and sick children, supply educational resources and food assistance to victims, and provide emergency medical relief for those wounded or displaced by the conflict. We feel these efforts should not be controversial. All humans deserve access to these basic rights, and it is important for those with means to offer aid in times of humanitarian crisis.

Our original post was shared by thousands of people, and because of IGN’s size and reach, we were able to serve as a leader for much of the rest of the industry to also help support those whose lives are torn apart by this conflict. We were proud to be part of a team at a site that was able and willing to offer this level of visibility to such critical humanitarian support efforts.

This decision to take down the post was made a day and a half after it was published. The takedown took place in the early hours of the morning on a weekend with no communication to its initial authors, the general IGN staff, or to the public as to why it happened. IGN’s editorial team has guidelines about updating content deemed needful of changes, something that we’ve done multiple times in the past — but wholesale removal of pieces without posting an explanatory statement is expressly against our usual policy.

Finally, more than twelve hours after the issue was first flagged to the broader team in our internal Slack, our staff received a late-night email from IGN leadership (well after reasonable working hours for the IGN Global team) with the same statement that was to be published publicly on the IGN Twitter account an hour later. There was no indication in the initial email that it would also serve as our official statement on the matter.

While we are glad to see a sizeable donation being made to Save the Children, we feel the decision to remove the original article and social posts, as well as the subsequent statement from management, is not only actively harmful to IGN’s public reputation and its employees, but also highly disrespectful to much of its content team and broader staff. The statement inaccurately ascribes the retraction to those “across IGN” rather than to the members of our upper management team who made the decision, giving a public impression that the decision was made by the editorial staff, despite this being a choice we did not make collectively and which many of us do not agree with.

Following an IGN-wide meeting this morning, we have come to understand that this was a clear instance of corporate overreach and demonstrated blatant disregard for the most basic standards of journalistic integrity and editorial independence. The business interests of a publication’s ownership and its editorial staff should stay separate at all times.

Importantly, we feel the latest statement dangerously turns what was a matter of supporting innocent civilians facing a humanitarian crisis into a harmful case of “both sides”-ism. Helping children and civilians harmed by the horrors of war should be uncontroversial no matter who the two sides are, and is in keeping with IGN’s ongoing efforts to highlight causes that are important to our team — such as our support for Black Lives Matter last year and our more recent celebration of AAPI Heritage Month and joining the call to end AAPI hate. The victims here deserve the same support.

We recognize the concerns expressed by upper management, but are nonetheless gravely disappointed by the lack of respect shown to our content team and broader staff in this matter, and expect our leaders to take responsibility for their decisions.

We, the undersigned, are calling for an all-hands meeting that includes IGN upper management and anyone at J2 Global or Ziff Davis who had a hand in the decision, by the end of the week, in which we would like full transparency about the reasoning and process behind the post’s removal. We ask that the management body responsible for the decision accept that responsibility publicly. We ask that management recognize IGN’s editorial authority and autonomy with regards to what it publishes, regardless of whether that work is news, reviews, features, guides, video content, or promotion of initiatives our staff feels are important, such as issue awareness or charitable support. While we want to make sure all voices on our team — IGN management included — feel able to weigh in on what we say as a site and how we say it, we are adamant that corporate leadership does not get the final word in editorial decisions.

Finally, we ask that management work with our staff to re-publish the piece. We are open to doing this through a process that incorporates management feedback and concerns about how its content is perceived, but we firmly believe that we must be allowed to advocate for humanitarian causes freely across all our channels.

We are a team of creators who love what we do and take pride in our work, which has previously enjoyed the support of — and freedom of unnecessary interference from — our parent companies. We would like that relationship to continue to be a positive one. It is our hope that management recognizes its errors this past weekend and is willing to work with us to ensure that IGN can continue to stand as a trusted publication, unconstrained by interference from corporate interests, and able to freely inform its audience about opportunities to support important and meaningful causes around the world.

Sincerely,

Alan Torres
Amanda Flagg
Amanda Medina
Andrew Shackelford
Armando Torres
Beatrice Haro
Benjamin Watts
Bo Moore
Bob Marshall
Bobby Amos Jr.
Brendan Graeber
Brian Altano
Cam Shea
Casey DeFreitas
Chris Del Padre
Christiane Townsend
Colin Stevens
Dale Driver
Dan Parkhurst
Dan Stapleton
Emily Bockian
Eric Sapp
Felicia Miranda
Francesca Rivera
Fred Sullivan
Ginger Smith
Isaiah Smith
Jada Griffin
James Vejvoda
Jeffrey Vega
Jesse Gomez
Jesse Schedeen
Jobert Atienza
Joe Skrebels
Jon Ryan
Jonathon Dornbush
Josh Du
Joshua Yehl
Julia Alexander
Justin Vachon
Kat Bailey
Kathleen Oum
Kevin Lee
Khalilah Alston
Lucy O’Brien
Luke Reilly
Mark Medina
Matt Kim
Matthew Purslow
Max Scoville
Michael Huynh
Michael Swaim
Mike Mamon
Miranda Sanchez
Narelle Ho Sang
Patrick Coughlin
Rebekah Valentine
Robert Anderson
Ryan McCaffrey
Scott Collura
Stella Chung
Taylor Lyles
Tom Marks
Tristan Ogilvie
Yusuf McCoy
Zachary Ryan

Signed after initial publication:
Adam Sligar
Angela Nguyen
Dustin Keeton
Mitchell Saltzman
Simon Cardy

As expected, a lot of chest-thumping of inmates demanding they run the asylum and do whatever they want with what is meant to be a video game and entertainment media outlet. What I find most peculiar is the paragraph in which they complain about "a harmful case of 'both sides'-ism." While most of the whining on Twitter disguise their anti-Israeli motives with "muh charities", this part makes it pretty clear that the activist IGN staff is purposeful and adamant about the original article and header flag's absolute black-and-white messaging that Palestinians are the victims and Israelis are the victimizers, which is ultimately what I believe got it taken down rather than the highlighted charities (even if they're Hamas-connected). These people simply do not believe there are Israeli victims worth considering in this conflict.

I have no doubt that most of the signatories are sincere in their signing, but I wonder if any of them have been browbeaten into joining by their coworkers or otherwise in fear of social/professional repercussions by their journo peers if they're discovered to not be demonstrating sufficient "solidarity". We're talking about a community of publicly-known, blue-checkmarked figures who all know each other, after all, so it wouldn't be difficult for an ideological whip to find out who among the IGN staff didn't sign.

Hard for me to guess what's going to happen from here, except that I highly doubt the signatories will be punished. I can see it going either way in nothing further happening or the signatories having their way with the article returned mostly unchanged. I expect that IGN management will propose a new charity article playing it even on the conflict without Palestinian-specific organizations, but I doubt the activist staff would accept it.

Shortly before this letter came out, VICE's Patrick Klepek went around recording the grievances of (ex) IGN people, throwing in an out-of-nowhere slander towards mild conservative evil incarnate Colin Moriarty as an added bonus. The Instagram complaint by IGN Israel has also been deleted some time during the day.
 
Why is it okay to be peer pressure into shitty beliefs but not okay to be pressured into smoking drugs?

Fuck this gay earth.
 
Last edited:
Here's a couple of audio content about this whole controversy.

First, a fairly even-handed video by Hoeg Law, explaining both the issues with the IGN staff's messaging for their charity drive while also criticizing management's reactive handling of it. If you're unfamiliar with Hoeg Law (Richard Hoeg) and his tech-specialized legal service and informational videos, perhaps you might have heard of him as one of the early big sponsors of the Easy Allies podcast, though it appears to me that he was ostracized by game journos as a wrong-thinker some time since then.

Second, though I haven't listened to it myself yet, VICE's newest Waypoint Radio podcast episode 397 ("Why the Conversation Around Palestine Has Changed") has its entire first hour talking about the IGN controversy as well as the recent Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Keep in mind that these VICE game journos under the Waypoint branding, including Patrick Klepek who wrote that article I mentioned, are among the most far-Left you'll find anywhere. They're worse than Kotaku and Polygon, purposefully fostered by their original editor-in-chief and open Marxist Austin Walker (also host of this podcast) to be a Leftist propaganda outlet. You may recall both Patrick and Austin as former Giant Bomb staff. Patrick and Gita Jackson are also former Kotaku staff. From the episode's text description:
On Friday, May 14th, 2021, IGN posted an article listing organizations that are providing aid to Palestinian citizens currently being harmed by Israeli attacks on Gaza and the West Bank. What followed over the weekend was an egregious breach of editorial independence, and an outpouring of support for Palestine in the Games space that makes it clear that the industry has changed for the better in some ways. Join Austin, Patrick, Rob, Cado, Gita, and special guest Emanuel Maiberg as they discuss what happened at IGN, what's being done to the Palestinian people, and ways the conversation around Palestine has changed.
 
I just want to point out that Call of Duty was or is considered to be one of the most popular games in America, so I found out to be a little hypocritical to think game journalists in IGN, Kotaku and Gamespot are supporting Palestine over Israel.

You actively played a game series that literally support wartime, American patriotism/imperialism and think that supporting terrorist groups to help aid Israel, while throwing rockets and killing children in the process, makes you the good guys?

View attachment 2175892

Keep in mind: I’m no prude that wants to say you’re a bad person for thinking that introducing Yuri Bezmenov to Call Of Daty players is a good idea, nor think it should be a bad thing to play the series in current day. It’s just that I find that game journalists delving into partisan politics while then still holding onto to the belief that all forms of video games have politics intersected into one another is just proof that they are in the wrong business.

But I think you guys already knew that.

Unfortunately CoD is just doing that so they don't lose the alt right fanbase who already hate the fact they are including women to their game after being seen as the ultimate dudebro shooter by Nintendo manchildren. The game makes a subtle burn at the war of terror seen from the other side as US was replaced by Russians and the political fallout caused by US policy without being direct about it. Better than what Ubisoft and Amazon done to Tom Clancy's franchise where you now have black John Clark, all controversial political elements gutted for generic shootyman multiplayer
 
Better than what Ubisoft and Amazon done to Tom Clancy's franchise where you now have black John Clark, all controversial political elements gutted for generic shootyman multiplayer
What Ubishit did to the Tom Clancy brand is really disgusting. The next Rainbow Six game is about an alien/zombie outbreak (the game director is some purple-hair hamplanet), the recent Ghost Recon was written by a former CIA guy so the story was about some PMC who took over an island owned by an autistic tech giant and you have to side with the terror-peaceful civilians.
I'm glad that there's no Splinter Cell game in production so they can't Last Jedi Sam Fisher.
 
Unfortunately CoD is just doing that so they don't lose the alt right fanbase who already hate the fact they are including women to their game after being seen as the ultimate dudebro shooter by Nintendo manchildren. The game makes a subtle burn at the war of terror seen from the other side as US was replaced by Russians and the political fallout caused by US policy without being direct about it. Better than what Ubisoft and Amazon done to Tom Clancy's franchise where you now have black John Clark, all controversial political elements gutted for generic shootyman multiplayer

Funny that I already had to correct somebody else spreading this game journo-manufactured disinformation in the SBFP thread just yesterday...
Alter Ego said:
Speaking of that recent Modern Warfare game, the controversy pushed by game journalists against it regard the "Highway of Death" campaign mission was a huge load of horseshit, the idea being that the game whitewashes an American war crime by substituting in the Russians. In truth, the real-life event from the Gulf War that goes by the same name was by no means a war crime. The US bombed a retreating Iraqi army, a legitimate target that had invaded and occupied the neighboring country of Kuwait. Keep in mind that a retreating army is not a surrendered army.

The wrongful treatment of Call of Duty and US military over this exemplifies why I don't trust any accusation of war crimes game journalists and their surrounding internet commenters espouse whenever the US military becomes a topic, such is the case when it comes to Six Days In Fallujah as well as the recent outrage and harassment of US military branches having their own Twitch channels.
 
Back
Top Bottom