- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
Oh wow it'd be the time to remove all those pesky environmental restrictions on gas and cars that make them consume 3x as much gas per kilometre.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The city of Pompeii was doing all right, but Vesuvius blew her top!What about the 70's
broke phi broke
Bikefags are also slightly more tolerable than Teslafags. But only slightly.ride a bike if you can. it's good exercise, and unlike a tesla it's actually within most people's means.
nuclear is over-regulated. the safety requirements are too stringent. this isn't trolling, it's an inevitable consequence of the "as safe as possible" regulatory regime.Environmental is the easy to understand barrier towards nuclear power, but even more important to what's preventing more nuclear power plants from being built is the financial barrier towards building one. Nuclear power plants are a lot cheaper than other energy sources over their entire lifespan, but as it turns out that's not what people are interested in because that lifespan is so long. What people are interested in is the point that the investment into the facility breaks even, which is much longer for nuclear power because it collects so much interest on the huge initial investment. As it is, nobody wants to wait 40 years for their investment into nuclear to turn them a profit when a dozen fossil fuel powered plants can do it in less than 10.
That's only going be solved if either nuclear power becomes significantly cheaper to build or the government hugely subsidizes the building of nuclear power plants. And as it is, they see it just the same as everyone else does- non-nuclear power plants are desirable because they're much cheaper in the short term. Your congressman doesn't want to fund a nuclear power plant that will make the world a better and cheaper place by 2060. He'll probably be dead by that point. It's not about the environment.
an example of the soviet-tier idiocy this results in:Excessive concern about low levels of radiation led to a regulatory standard known as ALARA: As Low As Reasonably Achievable. What defines “reasonable”? It is an ever-tightening standard. As long as the costs of nuclear plant construction and operation are in the ballpark of other modes of power, then they are reasonable.
This might seem like a sensible approach, until you realize that it eliminates, by definition, any chance for nuclear power to be cheaper than its competition. Nuclear can‘t even innovate its way out of this predicament: under ALARA, any technology, any operational improvement, anything that reduces costs, simply gives the regulator more room and more excuse to push for more stringent safety requirements, until the cost once again rises to make nuclear just a bit more expensive than everything else. Actually, it‘s worse than that: it essentially says that if nuclear becomes cheap, then the regulators have not done their job.
A forklift at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory moved a small spent fuel cask from the storage pool to the hot cell. The cask had not been properly drained and some pool water was dribbled onto the blacktop along the way. Despite the fact that some characters had taken a midnight swim in such a pool in the days when I used to visit there and were none the worse for it, storage pool water is defined as a hazardous contaminant. It was deemed necessary therefore to dig up the entire path of the forklift, creating a trench two feet wide by a half mile long that was dubbed Toomer’s Creek, after the unfortunate worker whose job it was to ensure that the cask was fully drained.
The Bannock Paving Company was hired to repave the entire road. Bannock used slag from the local phosphate plants as aggregate in the blacktop, which had proved to be highly satisfactory in many of the roads in the Pocatello, Idaho area. After the job was complete, it was learned that the aggregate was naturally high in thorium, and was more radioactive that the material that had been dug up, marked with the dreaded radiation symbol, and hauled away for expensive, long-term burial.
Cyclists are the niggers of the road. My desire to run them over is constant and powerful.Bikefags are also slightly more tolerable than Teslafags. But only slightly.
they just want decent cycling infrastructure in place so they dont have to worry about them getting run overCyclists are the niggers of the road. My desire to run them over is constant and powerful.
you should talk to a psychiatrist about your homicidal impulses. they have medication for it.Cyclists are the niggers of the road. My desire to run them over is constant and powerful.
A protected lane for them isn't enough. Their road needs to be physically separated from the main roads used by autos.they just want decent cycling infrastructure in place so they dont have to worry about them getting run over
like protected cycling lanes
Which puts them in the road and then they road hog the lane.they just want decent cycling infrastructure in place so they dont have to worry about them getting run over
like protected cycling lanes
Aren't fuel taxes in Europe used for funding infrastructure (roads, signs, traffic lights etc.)?Drove though a small village near me today, about an hours drive out from the nearest town of over 10,000 people - prices were €2.09/litre for unleaded and €2.19 for diesel.
For the American conversion, that's $8.73 and $9.15 a gallon respectively.
If any politician tries passing carbon taxes or any other "green" nonsense, remember, just say no.
I cycle everywhere I can, it is faster than using the bus and cheaper than driving.Cyclists are the niggers of the road. My desire to run them over is constant and powerful.
Aren't fuel taxes in Europe used for funding infrastructure (roads, signs, traffic lights etc.)?
It'll be even worse now that the Zombie has forbidden new drilling leases in Alaska, even the ones being built got fucked over.Hey guys, it’s been over a month since the last post, hour are gas prices entering summer?
View attachment 3298204
…no more mean tweets…
In the USA, "gas" is common shorthand for "gasoline" since at least the 1890s. The term itself first appeared in America as "gasolene" c.1863-1864, thought to be derived from British lamp oil trademark Cazeline and the Irish nemesis Gazeline.Why is petrol called "gas" in the US? I mean it's not a gas, it's a fluid.