General GunTuber thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I'm really getting tired of everyone parroting Ian mcclellan's opinions on everything the M14 is bad because I said it was .
Should have been replaced by Vietnam probably but it is not the worst firearm in the world as people make it out to be.

This is just the new AK's greatest weapon in the world anybody who criticizes AK just does not understand the glorious engineering of Kalashnikov any pointing out that the head of theStG 44 project was also in Russia around the time it was being finalised is spreading baseless conspiracies.
I know it is not the same assault rifle but they are weirdly similar in the overall design layout I'm sure they were having him work on absolutely nothing for the 10 years he was in Soviet employment.
I proof Germans weren't allowed to work in Soviet arms manufacturing I'm sure the Soviet Union notorious for its government transparency was following all of its own laws.

The truth is the matter is that he probably did actually work on the finalization of the AK47 but the original design actually does come from Michelle Kalashnikov.

But we're probably never going to get the documents on what he actually worked on even if he did work on it because the Russian government would never let the idea.


Also Ian's love of mediocre French firearms will never not be funny every single one of the French major weapons factories during World War One was set up by an American guy in the late 1800s

maxim was also originally from the United states America's making it better so subhuman Europeans can kill each other more effectively since the 1800s
 
I'm really getting tired of everyone parroting Ian mcclellan's opinions on everything the M14 is bad because I said it was .
Should have been replaced by Vietnam probably but it is not the worst firearm in the world as people make it out to be.

This is just the new AK's greatest weapon in the world anybody who criticizes AK just does not understand the glorious engineering of Kalashnikov any pointing out that the head of theStG 44 project was also in Russia around the time it was being finalised is spreading baseless conspiracies.
I know it is not the same assault rifle but they are weirdly similar in the overall design layout I'm sure they were having him work on absolutely nothing for the 10 years he was in Soviet employment.
I proof Germans weren't allowed to work in Soviet arms manufacturing I'm sure the Soviet Union notorious for its government transparency was following all of its own laws.

The truth is the matter is that he probably did actually work on the finalization of the AK47 but the original design actually does come from Michelle Kalashnikov.

But we're probably never going to get the documents on what he actually worked on even if he did work on it because the Russian government would never let the idea.


Also Ian's love of mediocre French firearms will never not be funny every single one of the French major weapons factories during World War One was set up by an American guy in the late 1800s

maxim was also originally from the United states America's making it better so subhuman Europeans can kill each other more effectively since the 1800s
Schmiesser personally forced Joe Stalin at gunpoint to adopt a stamped machine pistol version of the M1 Garand, this is historical fact.
 
I've always tried to warn people about PSA. They're damn near Bear Creek Arsenal levels of shitty, but PSA has much better marketing. PSA cuts corners at every turn. Even their "premium" rifles/uppers are a gamble, because PSA's assembly team is made up of apes paid in moonshine. Doesn't matter how good the components might be if they're put together like shit.

Not every gun PSA shoves out the door will be a complete dumpster fire, but it really does seem like the average PSA fanboy is a guy who gets a PSA gun, puts a couple mags worth of rounds through it, and calls it "good to go." You always see these dudes claiming they've never had a problem with any of their PSA guns. Of course they haven't. It's unusual to have anything go wrong with a gun you never shoot.
Its a little frustrating to when the fanboys regurgitate their mission statement(aka marketing phrase) like every other cheapo company doesn't say the same things. Their QC is questionable at best and I've heard mixed things about their customer service. Instead of focusing on improving those things(beyond the bare minimum to not be shit on by everyone, see PSAK gen 1,2,3,4,5(?)) they dump out a dozen new products and repeat the cycle. I can't recommend them to a new gun owner in good faith, maybe get one as your second or third AR as a beater/loaner once you know what to look for.

Pure coincidence they got shilled hard as """duty grade""" right around the time everybody got an AAC sponsorship. Totally not the same company, AAC and PSA just happen to share owners and list(ed) jobs on the same website.
 
Matt the anchor baby is claiming a brief stolen from him by FPC is being cited by the supreme court. That probably explains why he's been making vague accusations against them. Segment starts at 7:00
Ah yes. "If the people I hate did anything right it was by stealing it from me", which I'm starting to call 'The Roiloup Manuever" after some things in the Balldoverse.
 
GO GULAG, NOW!
So there are elements to the Mikhail Kalashnikov story that really open up the possibility that he wasn't the prime mover behind anything other than the basic design. The fact that the powers that be in the USSR loved the idea of a self taught peasant putting the qualified engineers in their place. Or the general opaque nature of soviet arms design bureaus, where party, military and intelligence services were all actively involved in.

Also there was the fact that he married an actual engineer who was working below her abilities as a draftsman, Ekaterina Kalashnikov possibly had a larger role to play. Not just in the design process but in navigating the politics of Soviet Arms production.

The story of Mikhail Kalashnikov was a good one for the soviets, and even now is part of Russian mythology.
 
BREAKING NEWS!
MASS MURDERER AND WAR CRIMINAL SAM HYDE HAS BRAINWASHED ARIZONA BASED GUN YOUTUBER ADMINISTRATIVE RESULTS AND HAS FORCED HIM TO COMMIT A MASS SHOOTING ALONGSIDE HIM AT A CHILDREN'S PLAYPLEX, 200 FEARED DEAD
CHILLING IMAGE POSTED RIGHT BEFORE THE MASSACRE
1718810477229.png
 
Uhh what if I want to be able to shoot further than 100 yards?
I guess I have to be autistically specific.

For self defense purposes outside the realm of military and law enforcement, pistols are more important for self defense for 99.99% of people. You can't bring a rifle into the grocery store, the bank, the gas station. You're more likely to encounter a violent nigger attacking you for the 23$ in your pocket than some giant American revolution that forces you to live innawoods as a militia man.
 
I guess I have to he autistically specific.

For self defense purposes outside the realm of military and law enforcement, pistols are more important for self defense for 99.99% of people. You can't bring a rifle into the grocery store, the bank, the gas station. You're more likely to encounter a violent nigger attacking you for the 23$ in your pocket than some giant American revolution that forces you to love innawoods as a militia man.
For an urban environment where you need to conceal carry and be able to draw quickly, yes, need a pistol. But nowadays you can fit a 5.56 or 300 BLK PDW in a backpack pretty well too. Not for any militia shenanigans, but more in case of a Summer of Floyd/Rooftop Koreans type scenario, dealing with a mob of niggers rather than just one or two. A rifle is much better visual deterrent too, they all heard of Rittenhouse by now.

Best of both worlds is conceal carry a pistol and have a rifle in a backpack/under car seat.
 
I'm really getting tired of everyone parroting Ian mcclellan's opinions on everything the M14 is bad because I said it was .
Should have been replaced by Vietnam probably but it is not the worst firearm in the world as people make it out to be.
I don't think anyone has claimed it to be the worst firearm in the world. Those who served with them generally liked them. That said, it was behind the curve already when introduced, and you can't ignore the issues related to the actual production of the rifle. Ian spent a good time covering the latter. Seems like rather than watching the actual video you just saw the title "M14: America’s Worst Service Rifle" and drew your conclusions from that.

I know it is not the same assault rifle but they are weirdly similar in the overall design layout
Yeah I guess if you squint you can see that both of these guns have detachable box magazines, open sights, and a pistol grip. You could probably find tens of firearms with that description.

The AK and the STG-44 (or any other German firearm TBH) are so different mechanically that you can't convince yourself that the Germans had anything to do with the actual design of the firearm.
 
For an urban environment where you need to conceal carry and be able to draw quickly, yes, need a pistol. But nowadays you can fit a 5.56 or 300 BLK PDW in a backpack pretty well too. Not for any militia shenanigans, but more in case of a Summer of Floyd/Rooftop Koreans type scenario, dealing with a mob of niggers rather than just one or two. A rifle is much better visual deterrent too, they all heard of Rittenhouse by now.

Best of both worlds is conceal carry a pistol and have a rifle in a backpack/under car seat.
For every 1 instance a truck gun getting used in a real way, there's 10,000 guns that get stolen out of cars. The niggers just don't spontaneously errupt into 2020 levels of rioting out of thin air. You'll have warning.

For God's sake people all you gave to do is CARRY and SHOOT your pistol. Don't carry a glock 42 and only shoot a 1911 and AR15. Don't carry a sig p365 and only shoot your sig 320. Pick a pistol that you can carry everyday, and that you will actually shoot and practice with on a regular basis. If your carry pistol is too small to shoot comfortably, then get something bigger. If your primary pistol is too big to carry comfortably, get something smaller.
 

Attachments

  • 1000000593.jpg
    1000000593.jpg
    377.8 KB · Views: 20
For every 1 instance a truck gun getting used in a real way, there's 10,000 guns that get stolen out of cars. The niggers just don't spontaneously errupt into 2020 levels of rioting out of thin air. You'll have warning.

For God's sake people all you gave to do is CARRY and SHOOT your pistol. Don't carry a glock 42 and only shoot a 1911 and AR15. Don't carry a sig p365 and only shoot your sig 320. Pick a pistol that you can carry everyday, and that you will actually shoot and practice with on a regular basis. If your carry pistol is too small to shoot comfortably, then get something bigger. If your primary pistol is too big to carry comfortably, get something smaller.
Meant more like have a rifle in the car while you're driving, then take the backpack with you as you leave. I wouldn't leave anything in a car unless I'm in the deep woods, and even then I'm paranoid about local thieving hillbillies.

As for training, I agree there. I wouldn't carry anything I didn't put at least 400-500 rounds through.
 
Back