General GunTuber thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
He had stated previously that once he is dead, there will be a video confirming it, which makes me suspect he recorded a goodbye video while he was still in decent condition.
Fucking hell, it speaks mountains about his strength of mind and character.

I'm not 1/100th of the man he is and was, and I doubt many here are even close, how can someone remain stoic in the face of certain death?
He's a legend, and that is what we will always remember him for.
 
He's certainly read and learned a lot about firearms history, but that's all he's got: second-hand historical takes (as opposed to, say, the Chieftain actively going through archives digging up old contemporary reports when writing about tanks) and an ability to put out short, entertaining little video lectures.

I don't know why anyone would consider him anything other than that. I guess it's that iNfLuEnCeR magic, where people build an image of the person in question that's just way out of proportion to what they actually are.

He does little neat videos with some decent research. He's not a historian in any way: if you read his French firearms book it's clear as the day that he does not have any formal education in historical research nor the particular drive to develop the skills by himself. He's an amateur, nothing wrong with that (a lot of good books have been written by amateurs) but his output is not original research, it's simply collating. I'd be incredibly interested in reading more of his father's books (for example, the ones on Japanese rifles) because Arming the Dragon, that a pal of mine got, was devastatingly subpar, at best an improvised pamphlet with scattered data.

He's not a veteran (not that I trust former military much about guns, but again, I'm Euro, my military men are all retarded white trash on welfare) nor an historian, but he's good at his media personality job. Bar the fucking mugs.
 
Guns Ian has never covered that are popular:
1. Desert Eagle
2. Hi-Point
3. Glock

I'd honestly love to have C&Rsenal do an April Fools video on the Hi-Point with some verisimilitude.
He just did a match with the Yeet Cannon 9 at least. Not sure what could be said about Glocks that hasn’t already been said, but a video on the History of Hi-Points would be cool.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Uranus Pink
He's now doing pro Israel content too, that "Hamas isn't making real guns!" And the "how smuggling guns is totally based and cool if it's the Jews doing it!" on stuff like the k31 rifles appearing in 1948 Palestine into the hands of militias (nevermind that those same militias mainly killed British soldiers and civilians in their pre independence revolt).
I mean, that Hamas propaganda video is blatant bullshit, but he gets a lot wrong, like saying that nobody would ever take sandpaper and finish a part while it's chucked up on a lathe. And being anti-palestine, pro-Israel is the mainstream take, so not really risking much by taking that side.
 
"Hamas isn't making real guns!"
I mean, it's a hot topic, and if you're gonna make money on YouTube it pays to try to apply your knowledge (or supposed knowledge) on stuff like this.

"how smuggling guns is totally based and cool if it's the Jews doing it!"
Don't be disingenuous now, not only has he covered early Israeli weapons long before the current conflict (like that one Johnson derivative), but he's covered guns smuggled for the Finnish and for the Irish just as well. There's a lot of ugly shit you can talk about with Israel, but that doesn't make their guns not interesting.

I guess it's that iNfLuEnCeR magic, where people build an image of the person in question that's just way out of proportion to what they actually are.
That shit is off putting, I never liked the "Gun Jesus" moniker.
 
I like tools&targets ammo tests, and I can't believe how badly modern budget stuff is doing. I've always stuck to 'premium' like Ranger T or HST, even PMC Starfire back in the day. Never understood the appeal of actually carrying or using any budget ammo, but the spread lately seems worse than ever between good stuff and cheap, and the prices aren't even that much better.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: likeacrackado
He does little neat videos with some decent research. He's not a historian in any way: if you read his French firearms book it's clear as the day that he does not have any formal education in historical research nor the particular drive to develop the skills by himself. He's an amateur, nothing wrong with that (a lot of good books have been written by amateurs) but his output is not original research, it's simply collating. I'd be incredibly interested in reading more of his father's books (for example, the ones on Japanese rifles) because Arming the Dragon, that a pal of mine got, was devastatingly subpar, at best an improvised pamphlet with scattered data.
Here's what I keep telling people: anyone who has enough time to produce daily or even just weekly content-dense videos on the internet is unlikely to be actively working in the field they claim to be in, or if they are they aren't likely to be particularly competent at it. It's like that for lawyers (Legal Eagle, Rackets and his entire gaggle of orbiters), and it's definitely like that for historians. Most of the people in the "history" side of youtube, both military and general history, aren't professionals. They're amateurs. Which, as you said, is fine: they have the passion and the time to take what the professionals have done and render it down to something the average viewer can understand.

A professional historian would need a lot more time to get a video out than Ian gives himself time for. Hell, even C&Rsenal, who are much closer to the "historian" end of the field, still spend an inordinate amount of time getting all their ducks in a row, getting footage, polishing scripts, things that a historian writing a book or an academic article wouldn't necessarily have to do. And neither go through pre- or post-publishing peer-review. In the end, it's still all entertainment. With some archival purpose for sure, particularly when a guntuber takes apart old guns and shows us internals that had never been recorded in high definition. But the purpose of these videos is the entertain as well as educate (otherwise nobody would watch them), and the people making them should never be put on pedestals or assumed to be professionals unless they claim to be. Like Paul Harrell.

Fuck, I can't stop thinking how much I'm gonna miss his autism.
 
Do people honestly view Ian as anything but a historian? I've seen him run 3-gun and he's average at best. He's also left handed which means about 70% of his take on ergonomics should be discarded.
Moreover, he is actually a somewhat poor shot (which he admits) and to the extent that he does well it's usually more related to the fact that he runs real fast and has the build of a ferret so he gets through obstacles well.
 
Bad example with C&Rsenal considering Othaias is activrly writing a book on revolvers.

Writing a book does not make you a historian nor a good researcher. Ian wrote a book too. It sold incredibly well compared to standard gun books thanks to influencer magic (one of my pet peeves about Headstamp publishing, focusing on weirdo subjects that will sell only through publicity).

I'll be glad to read and judge Othias' output, maybe if we take Mae and the shitty jokes out of the man he'll prove a good writer.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Corn Flakes
Who is the real inventor of the modern revolver and why is it Elizabeth Colt?
The way I recall the story is that she insisted that the Colt 1873 should have elegant and attractive looks to make it a more desirable product.
Colt 1873, Second Gen.jpg

Smart woman.
 
The way I recall the story is that she insisted that the Colt 1873 should have elegant and attractive looks to make it a more desirable product.
View attachment 5653671
Smart woman.
Well, she was right, you don't see Enfield revolvers still being made, do you?
Or how the Luger is the only pre-1911 pistol still being desired even by normies.
 
How's it going? Who is the real inventor of the modern revolver and why is it Elizabeth Colt?

Good but also hilarious. Presently it seems the core, modern triple-action was likely first patented by a man named Fagard. We are currently focusing on that to make sure but it is a game of gathering everything to prove a negative.

The most common rebounding, efficient system was patented by Fagnus. Though it likely went through Comblain along the way.

The whole project was started because I ran into repeated inconsistencies through various books. No one besides Muller has tried to actually trace an evolution of the revolver. Probably because the history is mostly Belgian. Muller had limited archival access and missed a good bit. We have been greatly helped by Google because we can either directly read or target and request whole lists of European patent summaries. From there we file requests with archives. Sadly many of the requested patents in Belgium have gone missing because of their bizarre filing and bad handling over the decades. We are lacking connections in Austria and Spain that would help as well.

The whole process has been expensive, we have several thousand spent on fees and more on sending people directly in to keep digging. However, we have thousands of patents ID'ed. We keep pushing them to the site at revolvers.candrsenal.com so everyone can find them.

We have a wonderful volunteer heading the organization of the raw search, so much so that if I can get a book together I am going to bill him as co-author. My job has been to analyze and pick where to focus, plus find extra help in various countries. I am also stretching to build the appropriate reference photography collection for the book.

I never meant to be a revolver expert as they aren't my favorite firearm, but the way everyone talked about them was so incredibly lacking I had to sort it out for my own sanity.
 
Good but also hilarious. Presently it seems the core, modern triple-action was likely first patented by a man named Fagard. We are currently focusing on that to make sure but it is a game of gathering everything to prove a negative.

The most common rebounding, efficient system was patented by Fagnus. Though it likely went through Comblain along the way.

The whole project was started because I ran into repeated inconsistencies through various books. No one besides Muller has tried to actually trace an evolution of the revolver. Probably because the history is mostly Belgian. Muller had limited archival access and missed a good bit. We have been greatly helped by Google because we can either directly read or target and request whole lists of European patent summaries. From there we file requests with archives. Sadly many of the requested patents in Belgium have gone missing because of their bizarre filing and bad handling over the decades. We are lacking connections in Austria and Spain that would help as well.

The whole process has been expensive, we have several thousand spent on fees and more on sending people directly in to keep digging. However, we have thousands of patents ID'ed. We keep pushing them to the site at revolvers.candrsenal.com so everyone can find them.

We have a wonderful volunteer heading the organization of the raw search, so much so that if I can get a book together I am going to bill him as co-author. My job has been to analyze and pick where to focus, plus find extra help in various countries. I am also stretching to build the appropriate reference photography collection for the book.

I never meant to be a revolver expert as they aren't my favorite firearm, but the way everyone talked about them was so incredibly lacking I had to sort it out for my own sanity.
Holy cow, nice to see you here. Thank you for the answer, or at least as much of one as you have come to at present. I'm sure you'll find Lizzy's engineering genius astounding when the patents finally come together.
 
Holy cow, nice to see you here. Thank you for the answer, or at least as much of one as you have come to at present. I'm sure you'll find Lizzy's engineering genius astounding when the patents finally come together.
Is this Elizabeth Colt thing a joke or something real-ish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AN/ALR56
Back