- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
The Boers captured a staggering amount of British arms and equipment during the war (the boers usually released the thousands of POW's they took while the British deported theirs to Sir Lanka and sent their families to concentration camps). So that by the end of the war they were mainly using various types of Lee Enfields/Metfords.I like how he accurately demonstrates all the manual of arms and evolutions and maneuvers from the British drill and musketry manuals. It's much more interesting than squarebashing.
The only video of his I thought was not a very good demonstration and rather misleading was a timed trial comparing the sustained rate of fire of clip-fed Mauser action against singly-loaded Lee-Metford action, to disprove the Boer War conclusion that clip-loading rifles could maintain a better rate of fire. I remember he fumbled some of the Mauser reloads and was super tryhard on the Lee-Metford reloads, on top of capping the trial at a rather low number of rounds per rifle (maybe 15 or 20) and he came to the erroneous conclusion that there was no appreciable difference between the reloading systems.
The Lee performed better with the Boers than it did with the British. Even in the current British Army units constantly fuck with soldiers individual weapons, ridiculous cleaning regimes, using rifles as PT props, armourers that aren't really armourers fucking around trying to fix faults. I'm willing to bet circa 1900 it was even worse. There would be a regimental shooting team, but every other soldier would fire the bare mininum, and in the days before mandatory quals I suspect some could go years without firing a rifle.
During the first boer war, the boers picked up that the British were consistently shooting low, even though the British never did. There's also suspicians that the Zulus took far fewer casualties at Isandlewana that was supposed, because the Zulus closed on them too fast for them to adjust their sights (the lack of ammunition is a proven myth). The problems with individual marksmanship were amplified by officers insisting on controlling fire while not having the training to give a fire control order that was anything other than a range a general direction.
Anyway during the Boer war British marksmanship was consistently shit, blaming the lee enfield and the dastardly mausers which the boers had stockpiled was largely cope. At the end of the war large British forces were geting hammered by smaller boer forces using the same Lee enfields they were.
Last edited: