BananaHand
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2024
Watching the Focustripp livestream with Yankee Marshall, the whole debate is a disaster.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://www.youtube.com/live/21Vcvixieuw?si=jYRzKwmLuT1Y5Jbk
This YZY prints guy seems like a proper lolcow

Cutting past the drama and autism towards Tripp, Ian's argument added up to "bad QA and tolerances being exceeded can make even safe designs unsafe". So far, even the FBI report hasn't been able to say it was a matter the P320 being a poorly-designed or a poorly-built pistol. The fact they had to grind the triggers to make them work points towards the latter. Someone has clearly fucked up between testing and mass manufacture.Im really surprised Ian hasn't released a cope sesh about the P320 yet. The FBI report and the Air Force thing were pretty inauspiciously timed in relation to his last "isolated incidents" video. Seems like he's trying to whistle past the (literal) graveyard on this - addressing when you're wrong is the most important part of maintaining credibility.
I think the FBI report shows at a minimum a design defect in relation to the striker block. I don't really see how you can say otherwise.even the FBI report hasn't been able to say it was a matter the P320 being a poorly-designed or a poorly-built pistol.
I have noticed basically every guntuber with industry contacts is desperate to suck off Sig and pretend that the p320 thing is not a direct result of corruption and intentionally subpar manufacturing. Just saw a video of James Reeves that was him trying really fucking hard to defend Sig and act like Sig's blatant corruption and criminal negligence wasn't actually corruption and negligence, and was just due to Sig offering their handguns at cost.Im really surprised Ian hasn't released a cope sesh about the P320 yet. The FBI report and the Air Force thing were pretty inauspiciously timed in relation to his last "isolated incidents" video. Seems like he's trying to whistle past the (literal) graveyard on this - addressing when you're wrong is the most important part of maintaining credibility.
The Siggers have killed a nigger. Just buy a bunch of Glock 17s and 19s, paint them brown, and call it good.
He did make a short making fun of the 320 using that retarded Russian holster that chambers a round when you push the gun down to unholster.I have noticed basically every guntuber with industry contacts is desperate to suck off Sig and pretend that the p320 thing is not a direct result of corruption and intentionally subpar manufacturing. Just saw a video of James Reeves that was him trying really fucking hard to defend Sig and act like Sig's blatant corruption and criminal negligence wasn't actually corruption and negligence, and was just due to Sig offering their handguns at cost.
They are so desperate to choke on Sig's cock for special industry treatment that they actually think anyone is buying their garbage. Ian's response to this has made me lose a lot of respect for him. He needs to just call Sig out and admit he was wrong, even if it means losing his industry darling status. It's too late for him to just keep his mouth shut on the topic.
Video if anyone is curious:
Oh, it absolutely was. This whole thing is on Sig and anyone trying to claim otherwise is being either an ignorant fool or outright dishonest.I think the FBI report shows at a minimum a design defect in relation to the striker block. I don't really see how you can say otherwise.
Additionally the franken-gun design history of the p320 is just suspect to begin with, and belies that the entire project was about cost cutting
See, that's what I want to dig into. Someone is going to get reamed for shit like this and I'd love to know how high up it goes. Post the links if you ever find them, please.@Corn Flakes you should go read about the MHS adoption process, I'll try and find links later if I have time. They didn't really test it, there is a lawsuit from Glock where their complaint is that the testing was all fake and incomplete, and the whole thing was a setup for sig to begin with.
There were pretty credible allegations of bribery and kickbacks before the safety issues came out.
That Airforce guy getting killed with his gun still in the holster turned the P320 from "bad PR" to "completely radioactive" overnight. Even if they recall every single P320, fix them completely for free and throw in a complimentary blowjob with every return of over 10 units, nobody wants to be holding the bag of liability for guns that somehow slipped through the cracks of the recall. That model is done.The core message seems to be there might be or might not be a mechanical issue with the gun (initially it sounds pretty sweep-y) but then goes into how it doesn't matter because this is basically strike 3. These pistols now represent an unknown risk unless they find a problem, and agencies aren't going to touch them with a ten foot pole if they can help it.
Which is true, I guess.
You'll probably like 95% of the video then. It's going to be interesting to see how deep people watch.. It starts off with a lot of 'nothing's been proven about the 320' and I expect a nonzero number of people will start reeing at that moment.That Airforce guy getting killed with his gun still in the holster turned the P320 from "bad PR" to "completely radioactive" overnight. Even if they recall every single P320, fix them completely for free and throw in a complimentary blowjob with every return of over 10 units, nobody wants to be holding the bag of liability for guns that somehow slipped through the cracks of the recall. That model is done.