Gimmick Account Twitter / '_________' posting their Ls/Ws / '_________' Out of Context - Unnecessary soapboxes, e-begging, >not posting on main, terminally online posters, "You are blocked from following _______"

Random Twitter """""""Celebrity""""""" outed as pedophile.

Am i supposed to be surprised?
No.
It helps that pedos are the most hated people in society like the younger people probably have parents or teachers that say pedos deserve to die.

Like it’s really funny how much pedos are rightfully hated since they try and fail to make it normalized and while some people think it can, literally no one will bat for them.

Hell I have more respect for the freaks who do it to loli art since there is a benefit of the doubt they have no interest in actual kids.

The assholes into actual children need the gulag along with zoosadists.

But to get back to gimmicks has anyone know what this guys deal is cause there is something off about him

View attachment 2482212
I haven't sensed anything off about him other than being a hardcore leftist, really. He's harmless on his own, but the rest of the circle is one enormous glob of autism.
 
I haven't sensed anything off about him other than being a hardcore leftist, really. He's harmless on his own, but the rest of the circle is one enormous glob of autism.
Fair it’s probably his furry avatar that makes me question but then again at least he isn’t a pedo like other accounts (looking at RightwingCope)
 
Is this peak zoomer? Imagine voluntarily spending this much of your time on the worst possible websites. Imagine the psychiatrists explaining the cause of their children's anguish to the parents.

It's been said before, but being different from the norm was punished a lot more before the internet, with anti-bullying efforts trying to mitigate the worst aspects of it. Suddenly, everyone and their mother has access to a computer/smartphone from age 7 onwards, all of it centralised, readily available and extremely curated, with poorly enforced safeguards and complete alienation culturewise from people past 30. The internet had its problems well before the advent of social media, but its availability and possibility to obscure one's identity and intentions were harder, and not nearly as normalised as today. End result is a progressive case of dissasocation (as the web is not representative of real life, yet) and later, a dose of hyperreality. Soon, we'll have an entire generation of people whose tastes are no longer recognisable within their own subgroup.
Those in charge can't do anything to counter this, as new standards are set year after year and the general consensus is that the kids will come around, as they always have.
Older people can't fathom the dissonance this causes among the youth and society at large, nothing important will change in the meantime and we will get to witness the end of postmodern society within our lifetime.

TL;DR: children need to be made clear what is socially acceptable, now more than ever. Remember, early and often.
View attachment 2479290
I don't agree that being a pedophile is as simple as being "different from the norm". I think that is the norm in those circles and I think the denizens of these online cesspits have a sort of hierarchy used to enforce them. Most news and entertainment media, academia, and other prominent institutions in the US are owned by relatively few people who are all on the same page and push this stuff from the top down. This isn't a conspiracy theory either, it's a conspiracy fact when they regularly get together for dinners and other events.

For the average Twitter moron there's a very strong incentive to support the perpetual sexual revolution if you want the system to throw you a few dollars and a small amount of power. Acting like a depraved lunatic and tolerating the intolerable assures the power structure that you aren't a threat, and that you're easily controlled.
 
Uploading an archive of the video since it features the OBVIOUSLY A CHILD's voice and lolcows, especially pedo lolcows, tend to go scorched Earth once they realize they've gotten got.


Also holy shit this dude is absolutely fucking insufferable. God damn I hate terminally-online Zoomers.
 
But to get back to gimmicks has anyone know what this guys deal is cause there is something off about him

View attachment 2482212

The iron law of furry avatars states that anyone who uses an anthropomorphic animal as an avatar is invariably a degenerated pervert. It is only a matter of time until their weird perversion is discovered.
 
"Disabled trans woman"
"Trans woman." Just translate this phrase, every time you see it, in your mind, as "fat dude."
Why is it that all Twitter pedos always rail hard against loli?
You have to ask?
1630003217546.png

1) pedoshielding, they think if they virtue signal hard enough they won't get caught, because
2) they're into actual children
He’s painting himself as the victim & trying to justify his actions. This is standard SO behavior.
In case anyone hasn't figured it out yet, HE KNEW.
 
I am more concerned about what the fuck did he talk about with a 11 year old when he was 18 to the point they fell in love. Are 11 years old more mature nowadays or are 18 yo just retarded?
It’s the latter. Keep that in mind the next time you see adults writing articles about children’s cartoons.
 
Fair it’s probably his furry avatar that makes me question but then again at least he isn’t a pedo like other accounts (looking at RightwingCope)
It's not really a furry avatar but its based off a video game character name Blinx.
An xbox magazine said that blinx would be in the higher ups next to Mario and Sonic.
that's what the avatar is based off of.
Zhw.jpg
 
There's an account called Science diagrams that look like shitposts, and I found some of its pictures pretty funny. However, they were almost unreadable due to various tranny fundraisers and political "activism" taking about half of the posts. But at some point, they completely dropped any politisperging and panhandling and only post on-topic pictures now, albeit less frequently. Wonder why, my bet is that people complained too much.
 
I know the main thrust of this thread are gimmick accounts, but earlier a few of the HILARIOUS corporate twitter 'comedy' accounts came up such as Steak Ums, I saw this gay and annoying story in my timeline, though it is a minor example. Some shit about Tucker Carlson criticizing Patagonia, which I guess means he can retroactively never have worn their clothing.


Screenshot from 2021-08-27 18-44-55.png


Which led to this EPIC burn from the corporate shill account courtesy of pedophile enablers the Lincoln Project:
Screenshot from 2021-08-27 18-47-24.png


Got that? Guess that means if you wear Nike running shoes it means you can never criticize them for their sweat shop labor practices.

This phenomenon also crosses over into consoomerism, this kind of immature behavior from what is nominally supposed to be a business account is instead used for 'cheeky' dunks to drum up brand loyalty. Again, a minor example but this kind of shit happens just about every other day. Kind of makes me miss the days when business PR people were fuddy-duddy dad types.
 
Fair it’s probably his furry avatar that makes me question but then again at least he isn’t a pedo like other accounts (looking at RightwingCope)
Blinx is one of those highly-touted videogame 'franchise-killers' that failed from the 90's, so while it is a furry, it's not without rhyme nor reason.

Got that? Guess that means if you wear Nike running shoes it means you can never criticize them for their sweat shop labor practices.

This phenomenon also crosses over into consoomerism, this kind of immature behavior from what is nominally supposed to be a business account is instead used for 'cheeky' dunks to drum up brand loyalty. Again, a minor example but this kind of shit happens just about every other day. Kind of makes me miss the days when business PR people were fuddy-duddy dad types.
Advertising in the USA seems to have been like that for a while now, Australia has a different advertisement culture, probably due to regulations and advertising bigwigs' philosophies.

There is crossover between political marketing and product marketing tactics, such as the 'Mac vs PC' ads Apple ran during the 2000s, or Samsung 'dunking' on Apple for various kerfuffles during their 'rivalry'.

1630134621445.png


1630134705616.png


This was even going on in the '90s with that whole 'SEGA does what Nintendon't' thing pre-2000s. Sure, it can be dismissed as 'trying to appeal to the youth', but evidently these types of attack ads are working if they continue to be used for at least 3 decades.
 
Last edited:
Back