Jarolleon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
It seems like the consensus in the "relevant" (i.e. bullshit studies) fields is so overwhelmingly in favour of ideas like systemic bigotry being the sole cause of all the problems of anyone who isn't a white man, everything being a social construct, gender, biological sex, and sexuality being independent, intersectionality &c. that it's very easy for some smug SJW cunt to say that anyone who opposes this stuff is just like a creationist in the early 2000s. Both are aligned with the political right, accuse this consensus of being manufactured through conspiracy (e.g. Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed), cite experts whose fields are only tangentially related to the topics at hand to back up their arguments, rely on the internet and public debates to propagate their ideas (to the extent that mini-personality cults form around such debaters) and so on. Hell, there was even a period in which creationists were dominant on Youtube, shortly followed by a wave of Euphoric Atheists who looked smart by taking apart their bullshit, a superficially identical pattern by the Skeptic dominance of Youtube politics videos being followed by the Breadtube takeover.
It's tempting to just dismiss those fields as "bullshit studies" like I did, and use some old "Hard on Soft Science" talking points from the time of the Sokal Affair to back this up, but trying to convince a normie that multiple established fields of study are nothing but subversive nonsense created by a bunch of literal domestic terrorists from the 70s getting jobs in academia is like trying to convince them that Joseph McCarthy did nothing wrong. Both are probably correct, but come off as Alex Jones-tier lunacy.
I think that a strong component of how this shit is so relentlessly pushed from on high is that it has the authority of "Science!" behind it in the eyes of the kind of people who listen to NPR/CBC when driving to work in the morning (i.e. basically the entire upper-middle class if my relatives are any indication), so attacking this argument is quite important. It's as if a great proportion of people in the West have already bought into the line of thinking I wrote out in the first paragraph; SJW shit is backed by scientific fact and the only question is how to implement it, and how to deal with the stubborn deniers.
It's tempting to just dismiss those fields as "bullshit studies" like I did, and use some old "Hard on Soft Science" talking points from the time of the Sokal Affair to back this up, but trying to convince a normie that multiple established fields of study are nothing but subversive nonsense created by a bunch of literal domestic terrorists from the 70s getting jobs in academia is like trying to convince them that Joseph McCarthy did nothing wrong. Both are probably correct, but come off as Alex Jones-tier lunacy.
I think that a strong component of how this shit is so relentlessly pushed from on high is that it has the authority of "Science!" behind it in the eyes of the kind of people who listen to NPR/CBC when driving to work in the morning (i.e. basically the entire upper-middle class if my relatives are any indication), so attacking this argument is quite important. It's as if a great proportion of people in the West have already bought into the line of thinking I wrote out in the first paragraph; SJW shit is backed by scientific fact and the only question is how to implement it, and how to deal with the stubborn deniers.