GLITCH Productions - From the guys that brought you the Super Mario 64 bloopers

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Wait does he actually compare himself to toriyama? I was just laughing at the reference to toriyama in the weird letter thing that was a blatant visual reference thing.
I felt that it was in poor taste for Ross to portray himself with that reference while painting himself as the underdog, as if he singlehandly penned the entire thing. It came off as a humblebrag.
 
Last edited:
>Literally comes in here just to say "YOUR CRITICISMS ARE NOT VALID! FUCK YOU!"
>I totally don't care bro

Yeah, sure dude. I'm not gonna derail the thread any further with this retarded slap fighting.
But yeah, you're a retard. Clearly you did give a shit or you wouldn't have said anything at all.
You sure love making up shit I didn't say. I never said I don't care, I said I care about valid criticism and that I'm not some asshat that folds the moment someone calls out how tryhard he is at proving himself right, unlike you. I also said that art should be judged separately from the artist, I detest Arin for his shitty playthroughs of Sonic Adventure games but I didn't let that cloud my judgement for the show.
All you have against me are a bunch of strawmen. How cute. I too am done entertaining your retardation.
 
I said I care about valid criticism
Fuck it I'm curious.
Describe to me what you consider "Valid criticism" because so far to my knowledge it just sounds like "Any criticism I personally like." because apparently none of mine are valid. So clearly I'm a retard who needs to be taught what valid criticism is. Please teach me, master critic.
Also you would've hated to read what I had to say about Murder Drones a few months ago.
 
The world building of gameoverse would be less of an issue if the show didn't take itself that seriously but it handles it the worst way possible where it simply swaps between dark trauma and quirky gag logic, looking pretentious and insecure.

When you watch Adventure you don't ask why Finn is the only human, you can understand it's a cartoon premise. But if episode 1 starts with Finn watching his people violently die and proceeds to have multiple realistic panic attacks (TM), the viewer is going to ponder this stuff more.

You know, with all this talk about gooning for cartoon furries, wasn't there a famous cartoon reviewer who's notorious for that? One so famous he has his own thread here?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=c6bCquaHFM4

I have yet to see someone explain gameoverse is good. Doesn't have to be a 4 hour video essay, i mean a simple honest line saying why you think it's good. Or just say nothing cause you know it speaks for itself. But most of the online dicussion i see is either some variation of

-POTENTIAL CARTOON
-blind praise for indie animation and industry circlejerking (bordering astroturfed)
-Random crossover fanart with popular games and very forced memes
-cat girl horny posting / bashing

and saberspark is part of that. He spends 3 minutes literally saying nothing but "the work they put into this", "a big step on the indie landscape", "it takes a lot of effort and team work to make something of this caliber". "they don't get enough props" and then dismisses criticism as "searching out for flaws and dismissing everything else".

>"The majority of us will never experience the hardship of making a cartoon" "It's WILD to see how much status youtubers gained over the years" "It's not a copy of pibby, yes it has the destruction of crossover worlds but it's not a copy"

AAAAAAA is the entire video literally going to be this be this??? Is this a grift to stretch the video to 20 minute mark? It has to be.

>Our main characters must help the bad guy win so they defeat the good guy and save the world? That's a cool twist with lots of potential for exploration

potentialpotentialpotentialpotential

>Yes the girls have the same body type. Fanservice? Maybe, but i like it. And it's only the pilot so i'm sure we will see what they cook up next
>It's a pilot it serves the purpose of getting the ball rolling. It's very smart to leave the viewers asking question.

pilotpilotpilotpilotpilotpilotpilot

This is not a real review, it's just mindless glazing. I know it's pilot yadayada but at least talk about the execution and wether you think the creator can live up to it.

If Glitch's goal was to find a second TADC then i think Gameoverse won't make it. It's youtuber and newgrounds names attract a new audience but one they probably already had (terminally online / indie animation fans) and it's unlikely to bring actual kids/teens or normies. It's tone is all over the place.

Like, you need more than good animation fights to make kids and teens watch your show (look at Rise of TMNT). Murder drones for example is a hyper chaotic and "cool" show, while TADC is so unique and started pretty funny. TADC main theme is also really iconic and easy to hum along (incredibly underrated factor).
 
The world building of gameoverse would be less of an issue if the show didn't take itself that seriously but it handles it the worst way possible where it simply swaps between dark trauma and quirky gag logic, looking pretentious and insecure.

When you watch Adventure you don't ask why Finn is the only human, you can understand it's a cartoon premise. But if episode 1 starts with Finn watching his people violently die and proceeds to have multiple realistic panic attacks (TM), the viewer is going to ponder this stuff more.
You can watch cartoon writer degrade in real time because the 2nd half is close to what happens at the end of the series.
 
Fuck it I'm curious.
Describe to me what you consider "Valid criticism" because so far to my knowledge it just sounds like "Any criticism I personally like." because apparently none of mine are valid. So clearly I'm a retard who needs to be taught what valid criticism is. Please teach me, master critic.
Also you would've hated to read what I had to say about Murder Drones a few months ago.
lmao.png
He dm'd me. :story:
Also what the fuck is sealioning? Can someone explain? I have literally never heard that term before and searching just brings up actual sea lions.

EDIT: Okay apparently I'm asking too many questions I guess. :lit:

"Sealioning is an online trolling and harassment tactic where a bad-faith actor pesters someone with relentless, polite requests for evidence or endless explanations. By maintaining an exaggerated pretense of "just asking questions" and wanting a "reasonable debate," they aim to exhaust their target's patience and make them appear unreasonable."

So far it seems like his main arguments boil down to "I don't like what you said." and "IT'S JUST THE FIRST EPISODE CHUD, SHUT UP!" we gotta wait until episode 2 before we're allowed to talk shit guys. Those are the rules.
 
Last edited:
I still don't get why everyone is so hung up on her being "Gooner bait" you figure they'd view that as a plus. Every time I think I understand Twitter they somehow find a way to amaze me again.
Really just goes to show their entire thing is fabricating thing to be mad at, no matter what. Even if it betrays something they'd defend before, there must be outrage!
 
>So uhhh why don't they just TELL them not to complete the game?
>UHHHHHH THE PLANET IS ALIVE AND GOES APESHIT IF YOU DO!
>BRILIANT!
I didnt mind the 'game' freezing/glitching out a little, but them immediately being hunted down for it felt like a bit much. Why couldn't it just have not been possible in the same way hurting the npc's wasnt possible??
 
Now that I've had time to think it over, I think the issue with Kit's breakdown in the pilot is how unsubtle it is. Kit kneels down, screams about how she's a failure, Gobbles gives a small therapy session. All of this for a plot point that won't be further developed until future episodes.

If the story was specifically about Kit's trauma, then fine. It's not though. It's about Kit and friends going to different game worlds to stop the hero from winning. Kit's trauma is definitely going to be important to her character, but outside of her design, no one knows or cares about who this character is yet.

In my mind, a better way to approach this would be to have Kit's trauma be communicated in subtle ways, like facial expressions and making brash decisions, and so on. The dream sequence right at the start should've been enough to relay the fact that Kit still thinks about her past, and that it still weighs on her. Only AFTER we've had several episodes with Kit, and ample time to properly get to know and like her as a character can we finally address the trauma straight on. (Though I'll admit, that risks the opposite problem of being TOO subtle, and feeling like the big trauma scene came out of nowhere)

As it is, Kit having TRAUMA written on a glowing neon sign above her feels like an obvious ploy to quickly get the audience to sympathize with her, when it should've been the other way around. Kit should've earned the audience's respect first, then have her trauma properly addressed.
 
1000115805.jpg 1000115807.jpg 1000115804.webp 1000115809.jpg

Also, to play devils advocate to the twitter types, it is A LITTLE boring that every humanoid female character weve seen so far has the exact same base model, especially when everyone except miss information also has a fuckass bob haircut. You dont even have to remove their waist definition or anything but none of them even have tall or short person proportions.

I suppose it makes sense for the catgirls to look similar since theyre from the same videogame where reusing the same base model wouldve been realistic, but lulu and miss information looking like they belong to the same game world even though theyre probably not from there is at least not using the whole videogame multiverse setting very creatively.
 
I love the fact that Jschlatt is one of the main selling points of this show, I think it hurts the “this isn't gooner bait” argument, because we all know Jschlatt is an e-whore addicted simping faggot. Wasn’t he trying to fuck JustaMinx or whatever her dumbass name is?

Also whoever was the absolute genius who edited this piece of shit together, let Jschlatt use his own microphone instead of making him record it properly, and his audio sounds like complete dog shit compared to everyone else. Completely throws any investment I may have had, out the window.

This is tranime slop made for pornsick retards who pretend that they’re not on the same intellectual level as Idubbbz.

Saberspark when there's furries and or women to goon
YouCut_20260410_130250548.mp4
I hate this faggot.
Saberspark somehow actually found a way to make an attraction to women gay.
 
If Glitch's goal was to find a second TADC then i think Gameoverse won't make it. It's youtuber and newgrounds names attract a new audience but one they probably already had (terminally online / indie animation fans) and it's unlikely to bring actual kids/teens or normies. It's tone is all over the place
That was me essentially. I haven't bothered watching anything Glitch put out since the TADC pilot and I genuinely went in with an open-mind. I haven't given a shit about indie cartoons for years and I WANTED to be convinced that there is some good stuff out there, especially since nowadays it's so hard to find objective opinions about this sort of stuff. It's either full of annoying glazers or haters who just seethe constantly that something they don't like is popular.

It's a pilot and a pilot is supposed to convince you, but as I have posted prior, I was greeted with a mediocre boring end-product that just tried to sell toys at the end. I haven't cared for any of the names in the credits in a long time and none of them impressed me or convinced me that I SHOULD be impressed. There is nothing of value here unless you are already freakishly obsessed with these people.
 
There is nothing of value here unless you are already freakishly obsessed with these people.
I get the feeling from the Gameoverse pilot that the creative team was reluctant to change anything from the first draft and no one said anything bc the project lead is popular and they were afraid of getting booted from the super secret awesome club on Discord or something.

I won't drag it too hard. I liked the animation and most of the character design. The rest of the pilot was hollow and blah for me. Maybe I'm not the target audience, which is teens with access to their parents' credit card, I suppose.
 
Back
Top Bottom