Business Go Woke, Go Broke? Not a Chance, Say Ben and Jerry - Ben & Jerry’s founders speak about mixing politics with business, ice cream brand’s future and why Ozempic doesn’t worry them

image.jpg
Ben & Jerry’s founders Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, in a black shirt, say the brand is now at a crossroads.

By Saabira Chaudhuri | Photographs by Oliver Parini for WSJ
June 26, 2024 5:30 am ET

Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield are about as well known for their progressive politics as they are for quirky ice cream flavors like Chunky Monkey and Phish Food.

Their experiment in melding business with social justice for years seemed like a model to which many in the corporate world were warming up. And then attitudes cooled.

Some businesses have started to put less emphasis on the kinds of social and political issues that Ben & Jerry’s has championed. Certain investors have urged corporations to stick with what they know best.

For their part, the lifelong friends, both now 73 years old, say their style of corporate activism isn’t bad for business—just the opposite.

Most companies aren’t comfortable engaging with social issues because “they don’t want to potentially alienate customers,” says Greenfield. “The irony is for Ben & Jerry’s, that is what makes the company successful.”

Cohen and Greenfield say the brand is now at a crossroads after parent company Unilever said in March that it would spin off or sell its ice cream division, a move interpreted by some as the culmination of a failed experiment in mixing progressive politics with big business.

While Ben & Jerry’s has for decades worn its heart on its sleeve, some of the brand’s political pronouncements in recent years have angered certain consumers and investors. Cohen believes this is at least partly the reason for its owner’s decision to part ways. For Unilever, “Ben & Jerry’s creates a lot of problems,” he says.

im-972343.jpg
Climate change has been one of the issues on which Ben & Jerry’s has long focused.

Cohen and Greenfield, who still count as Unilever employees, say the upset is worth it.

The founders shared internal sales data with The Wall Street Journal that showed the brand had logged stronger sales growth than its parent’s broader ice cream business in three of the past five years. Neither side disclosed profit figures.

Unilever’s ice cream head, Peter ter Kulve, says that, “whilst we don’t always agree” with Ben & Jerry’s, the combination of the company’s leadership, the brand’s board and founders’ involvement has been successful.

Do Cohen and Greenfield think the brand could be better off with a new owner? “To have a values-aligned owner of Ben & Jerry’s would be a beautiful thing,” says Cohen.

Of all the multinationals that could have bought Ben & Jerry’s, Unilever—given its historic focus on sustainability—was seen as perhaps the best fit. But in recent years, a marketing strategy aimed at imbuing all of Unilever’s brands with a social or environmental purpose fell flat. Unilever has since narrowed the strategy to a few big brands.

Both men earned millions from Unilever’s $326 million purchase of their ice cream brand and say the deal hasn’t been all bad. Unilever helped Ben & Jerry’s expand internationally—it is now sold in 43 countries—and figure out the nuts and bolts of building new factories. It also gave the brand a bigger platform to push its social mission, albeit less aggressively than the founders would have liked.

In recent years, a handful of prominent brands have been hit by consumer boycotts after wading into the culture wars. Companies are also being presented with more investor proposals against environmental and social initiatives while some activists are taking companies to court over their diversity and inclusion pledges. The upshot is that companies, particularly in the U.S., are talking less about their ESG efforts.

Cohen and Greenfield say they understand the pressure public companies—including Unilever—are under to avoid thorny issues but think this limits their growth prospects. Consumers, particularly younger ones, expect brands to speak out about issues like war, racism and climate change, they say.

im-972344.jpg
Social activism became a part of Ben & Jerry’s identity early on, alongside whimsically named flavors. PHOTO: TOBY TALBOT/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Frosty relations​

Ben & Jerry’s began in 1978, when Cohen and Greenfield started selling ice cream out of a gas station in Burlington, Vt. They threw chunks of candy and nuts into partially frozen smooth ice cream largely because the heavily textured result appealed to Cohen, whose poor sense of smell impedes his ability to taste.

Alongside whimsically named flavors, social activism became a part of the brand’s identity early on. In 1988, Cohen and Greenfield launched Peace Pops, a chocolate-covered ice cream on a stick that advocated for cuts to U.S. military spending.

By the 90s, the brand had become one of America’s most recognizable brands, later that decade attracting takeover interest. Cohen and Greenfield say they didn’t want to sell but, as a public company, had to put Unilever’s offer to shareholders.

To keep the founders happy, Unilever agreed to let Ben & Jerry’s retain an independent board that would dictate the company’s social mission.

Despite this, “the first few years were rough,” remembers Cohen.

Unilever cut costs, making pints with less butterfat and using smaller, cheaper chunks. A proposed new flavor intended to celebrate Vermont’s law legalizing civil unions for same-sex couples was scrapped.

Over the years, “the social mission rose or fell based on who the CEO was,” says Cohen. “If the CEO was into it, it prospered and if the CEO wasn’t it didn’t.”

im-972346.jpg
Ben & Jerry’s publicly opposed Donald Trump by launching a flavor called Pecan Resist. PHOTO: JOY ASICO/AP IMAGES FOR BEN & JERRY’S

im-972345.jpg
Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield say consumers expect brands to speak out about social issues. PHOTO: CHIP SOMODEVILLA/GETTY IMAGES

Unilever preferred to attach its brands to more neutral causes, like reducing food waste or improving sanitation. Ben & Jerry’s, by contrast, publicly opposed what it described as Donald Trump’s “regressive agenda” by launching a flavor called Pecan Resist. It accused President Biden on social media of fanning the flames of war by sending troops to Europe after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Tensions between the brand and its parent burst into public view soon after Ben & Jerry’s said it would halt sales in Jewish settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and contested East Jerusalem in July 2021. It said selling in those settlements, considered illegal by much of the international community, was inconsistent with its values.
The move prompted some consumers to boycott Unilever’s brands, and U.S. pension funds to sell shares in the company.

Unilever tried to quell the furor by selling Ben & Jerry’s business in Israel without its permission. The brand then sued its parent, saying it had violated the acquisition agreement. The two sides eventually settled, but tensions persist.

“There is no other entity like Ben & Jerry’s at Unilever,” says Cohen. “They don’t understand it, they don’t really know how to deal with it and they want to run it like any other brand that they own.”

In January, Unilever prevented Ben & Jerry’s from calling for a cease-fire in Gaza, the founders say. The brand circumvented its parent by issuing a statement via its independent board.

How involved Cohen and Greenfield remain depends on to what extent any new owner permits the brand’s board to continue to pursue its social mission.

If bought by a finance-focused entity, Ben & Jerry’s will suffer, Cohen says. “They don’t realize the intangibles that are behind the numbers.”

im-972347.jpg
The Ben & Jerry’s factory in Waterbury, Vt.

im-972348.jpg
The founders say Ben & Jerry’s sales have grown at a 7% compound annual growth rate between its acquisition in 2000 and last year.

Still eating ice cream​

Born four days apart, Cohen and Greenfield have been best friends since seventh grade.

They live 2 miles from each other near Ben & Jerry’s headquarters in Vermont, and hang out regularly. “It’s more fun to do things together,” says Greenfield.

The pair have dabbled in various construction projects together, building a gazebo, cabin and bench in their free time. “It’s much more beautiful than your usual park bench,” qualifies Cohen. “We didn’t buy any lumber, we just cut down trees.”

They also get together to do physical-therapy exercises to help their bad backs but dislike the dead bug, which involves lying on your back and raising and lowering opposite arms and legs.

Both men have remained involved with Ben & Jerry’s and get a salary from Unilever although they have no managerial or operational role at the company. They show up to franchisee meetings, scoop-shop openings and employee training sessions to shake hands and offer encouragement.

They see their main role as bringing visibility to causes the Ben & Jerry’s brand supports. They are currently lobbying to end qualified immunity, the controversial doctrine that says police officers and other officials can’t be sued for misconduct unless they have violated “clearly established” rights.

im-972349.jpg
The ‘flavor graveyard’ outside the Ben & Jerry’s factory in Waterbury, Vt.

Recently, Unilever’s new chief executive, Hein Schumacher, visited Vermont, where he met the founders. Cohen describes him as a “nice guy” but says they didn’t spend a lot of time together. “I assume he’s a very good executive,” he says. “Business executive.”

The pair’s favorite flavors—Coconut Almond Fudge Chip for Greenfield and Mocha Walnut for Cohen—have long since hit “the flavor graveyard.” The coconut flavor wasn’t selling well enough while the mocha one drew lots of consumer complaints. “Half of them would say it had too much chocolate in it and the other half would say it had too much coffee,” says Cohen.

How worried are the founders that in an era of weight-loss drugs people could eat less ice cream?

Not at all, they say. Greenfield says people’s relationship with ice cream is about enjoyment or celebration, not nutrition. Still, people should eat ice cream in moderation. “You’re not supposed to eat a whole tub at once,” he says primly.

“I think you can eat a whole tub at once,” interjects Cohen. “You’re just not supposed to do it every day.”

im-972350.jpg
Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield live 2 miles from each other near Ben & Jerry’s headquarters in Vermont.

Source (Archive)
 
Their Ice Cream has been shit for decades and they mostly survive because of contracts with schools to give those mini ice creams out (they ran out of the WW2 and Vietnam War ice cream surplus they used to serve in schools years ago, that shit was cash).
Wait, that dope ice cream I used to get in school in the 70s and 80s with the little wooden spoons was GI 'Nam surplus? That's awesome. Kinda sad though, because from time to time I think I'd like to try it again for the nostalgia factor if I could find it, but I suppose that would be impossible.

(((Ben Cohen))) and (((Jerry Greenfield))) - name an iconic self hating jew duo that not only is insufferable but probably only "liked" by shitlibs because they say the "right things", but 10 minutes later they are complerely forgotten about.
Holy shit, those guys are joos?! Wow, thanks for putting the echos on there man, I totally never would have guessed! 🙄
 
Do you have independent ice-cream makers in America?
In Europe, we have countless little ice-cafes where Italians make great ice-cream themselves.
I hope you have that too, and not just mass-market premade slop like this faggy brand.
Sure we do, even smaller towns usually have a locally made and sold ice cream shop.

They are becoming less common, but they’re still there.
Generally they don’t have as many flavors and they rotate flavors of the week, because it’s all handmade.
 
>Go to freezer to get ice
>See Jimmy Faggton
>Day Ruined
Pretty much.

It's not just his stupid face. It's that he's wearing that very specific, idiotic expression he puts on when he tells a shit joke and waits for his audience of trained monkeys to laugh.

The Colbert one is just as bad. It just radiates smug.
I wanna dunk Colbert's face in a toilet that I clogged with last night's Taco Bell.
 
I forgot about that stuff. I remember going into the grocery store with my mom one day and just seeing two freezers empty. Was it a bacteria?
Listeria, specifically. It's a common problem with food production, especially dairy, when they don't keep things clean and sterile.

With ice cream, it can usually be tracked to employees leaving stuff out of the fridge too long or not properly cleaning out the tanks/mixers/lines.

Listeria is unlikely to get healthy adults sick, but if it does get you sick, it's serious. Sepsis and Meningitis.
 
Listeria, specifically. It's a common problem with food production, especially dairy, when they don't keep things clean and sterile.

With ice cream, it can usually be tracked to employees leaving stuff out of the fridge too long or not properly cleaning out the tanks/mixers/lines.

Listeria is unlikely to get healthy adults sick, but if it does get you sick, it's serious. Sepsis and Meningitis.
Oh man talk about coincidence, but the FDA had to pull more ice cream from shelves due to listeria again recently. I didn't know it could cause Sepsis and Meningitis. That's brutal.
 
Man honestly when I want Ice cream, I either get Blue Bell or Graters Ice cream. Those are much cheaper and I believe better quality and not filled with fake activism like Ben & Jerrys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Tensions between the brand and its parent burst into public view soon after Ben & Jerry’s said it would halt sales in Jewish settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and contested East Jerusalem in July 2021. It said selling in those settlements, considered illegal by much of the international community, was inconsistent with its values.
The move prompted some consumers to boycott Unilever’s brands, and U.S. pension funds to sell shares in the company.

Unilever tried to quell the furor by selling Ben & Jerry’s business in Israel without its permission. The brand then sued its parent, saying it had violated the acquisition agreement. The two sides eventually settled, but tensions persist.
Funnily enough Ben and Jerry's almost got 10 Palestinian workers fired due to this policy


The distribution company employs 10 Palestinians from nearby villages who receive working conditions and salaries they could not earn under the auspices of the Palestinian Authority.
Ben & Jerry's decision to halt sales of their ice cream in the West Bank will harm Palestinian workers who work for the main distributor of the ice cream in the West Bank, Hen Israeli, vice president of the distributor, warned in an interview on Wednesday

Ben and Jerry's Israel went independent and makes better ice cream than American Ben and Jerry's since they're not constrained anymore.
 
Cohen and Greenfield
((()))
Being woke is literally Ben and Jerry’s entire brand, their bottom line isn’t dependent on the expectation that conservatives will continue buying their products when they were probably never buying Ben and Jerry’s in the first place.
They know their audience. Ice cream is for children and short-sighted or self-infantilizing people with poor discipline, willpower or moderation -- i.e. progressives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ._.
Buying any big brand of ice cream from the store is ultimate smooth brain move. There is almost always a cheaper, high quality ice cream available. Check the ingredients. If the first ingredient is milk and it has no corn syrup, you're good to go.

My local grocery store has good store brand ice cream and I'm pretty sure it's just repackaged Breyer's as the ingredients are very similar (the flavors are named different, so I can't do a direct comparison), but it's half the cost.
 
That's why this article was made: damage control by Unilever. Being a spergy political brand, Ben & Jerrys is stuck between offending Jews (Their investors and corporate benefactors) or Muslim Apologists and the Woke crowd (Their customers). Not having an opinion or remaining neutral isn't an option.

This article was a useful refresher.

Had a normie ask me unsolicited what I thought about the Ben&Jerry's brand recently.

I don't know if I've ever actually tasted it. But I knew the brand was nauseatingly woke but couldn't elaborate on specifics.

After finishing the article though, I thought to myself "What was the point of this article? There's no real news in it".
 
Do you have independent ice-cream makers in America?
In Europe, we have countless little ice-cafes where Italians make great ice-cream themselves.
I hope you have that too, and not just mass-market premade slop like this faggy brand.
I know of a few in my city, but it doesn't seem that popular.

Bigger issue I think is people often live spread out enough that you wouldn't have a niche ice cream store plunked down in a random suburban area. Feel like I only see nicer non-chain restaurants and stuff like that in wealthier/denser areas.

So if the average person who lives further out in the suburbs or whatever wants some nice ice cream, they'll buy some at the store.
 
Thank Father Dagon for indie ice cream makers. They more or less don't have the time for politics since they only have one job - selling ice cream in the first place.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: pot of sneed
they don't even offer BJ where I live except in a few places where people still got the "IN THIS HOUSE WE BELIEVE" signs there are a few pakimarts that buy from them
 
Back