- Joined
- May 8, 2020
This is going to be a very unpopular opinion but calling Nick a king for his behaviour is great unintentional(?) trolling because in no way does this narrative benefit him.
It shifts the Balldoguard narrative from "Ummm ackchually that's powdered sugar on his nose and his starving children are crisis actors" to "Yeah, Nick is guilty and that's based", which will alienate the normies and even damage Crackieta's case if he decides to acknowledge him and Ralph.
If this had been old Godwinson I would have thought it was some deep cover troll op. Now I just think his brain is completely fried, but in any case I hope he keeps defending him.
It shifts the Balldoguard narrative from "Ummm ackchually that's powdered sugar on his nose and his starving children are crisis actors" to "Yeah, Nick is guilty and that's based", which will alienate the normies and even damage Crackieta's case if he decides to acknowledge him and Ralph.
If this had been old Godwinson I would have thought it was some deep cover troll op. Now I just think his brain is completely fried, but in any case I hope he keeps defending him.