Disaster Google will soon default to blurring explicit image search results - To "protect democracy", you must be logged in to see unblurred breasts or dead Russians

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/202...lt-to-blurring-explicit-image-search-results/ [A]

Google will soon default to blurring explicit image search results​

Unless you're logged in and over 18, don't expect to find violent or racy stuff.​

KEVIN PURDY - 2/7/2023, 3:25 PM

Google's new Blur setting for SafeSearch will soon be the default, blurring explicit images unless you're logged in and over 18.


Google's new "Blur" setting for SafeSearch will soon be the default, blurring explicit images unless you're logged in and over 18.

Google has debuted a new default SafeSearch setting, somewhere between "on" and "off," that automatically blurs explicit images in search results for most people.

In a blog post timed to Safer Internet Day, Google outlined a number of measures it plans to implement to "protect democracies worldwide," secure high-risk individuals, improve password management, and protect credit card numbers. Tucked into a series of small-to-medium announcements is a notable change to search results, Google's second core product after advertising.

A new setting, rolling out "in the coming months," "will blur explicit imagery if it appears in Search results when SafeSearch filtering isn't turned on," writes Google's Jen Fitzpatrick, senior vice president of Core Systems & Experiences. "This setting will be the new default for people who don't already have the SafeSearch filter turned on, with the option to adjust settings at any time."

Google's explanatory image (seen above) shows someone logged in and searching for images of "Injury." A notice shows that "Google turned on SafeSearch blurring," which "blurs explicit images in your search results." One of the example image results—"Dismounted Complex Blast Injury (DCBI)" from ResearchGate—is indeed quite explicit, as far as human viscera and musculature goes. Google provides one last check if you click on that blurred image: "This image may contain explicit content. SafeSearch blurring is on."

Explicit images, such as the blast injury shown in Google's example, will be blurred by default in Google search images, unless a user is over 18, signs in, and turns it off.

Explicit images, such as the "blast injury" shown in Google's example, will be blurred by default in Google search images, unless a user is over 18, signs in, and turns it off.

If you click "View image," you see life's frail nature. If you click "Manage setting," you can choose between three settings: Filter (where explicit results don't show up at all), Blur (where both blurring and are-you-sure clicks occur), and Off (where you see "all relevant results, even if they're explicit").

Signed-in users under the age of 18 automatically have SafeSearch enabled, blocking content including "pornography, violence, and gore." With this change, Google will automatically be blurring explicit content for everybody using Google who doesn't log in, stay logged in, and specifically ask to show it instead. It's a way to prevent children from getting access to explicit images, but also, notably, a means of ensuring people are logged in to Google if they're looking for something… very specific. An incognito window, it seems, just won't do.

Google turned on SafeSearch as its default for under-18 users in August 2021, having been pressured by Congress to better protect children across its services, including search and YouTube.
 
What do y’all use as replacements? I’ve been using for Google since I was a wee lass so I guess I’ve adapted to its crap factor, but I would like recs for something better.
I wouldn't recommend Duckduckgo at least. I was using them since around 2014 but in the last few years the results have become utter shit. It kept giving me results based off my location even for searches where it doesn't make sense. I can't decide if I prefer Brave or Searx now.
 
But where's the fun of showing shocking images to your friends?
 
Knowing how twitter , discord, and other sites register "explicit images" using machine learning, a lot of actually sfw shit is gonna get filtered but gore and actual hardcore porn is gonna mysteriously skirt by the filter. It's been getting worse lately too. Super fucking ridiculous to the point I once saw an image of a famous ancient stone monument that's literally just a stone square get marked as "sensitive content" once.
 
My take: nothing Google does is for any reason other than to acquire more data, and this is just to push more people into logging in for that purpose. The "protect democracies" excuse is comical. This will affect you using a VPN. Even Bing isn't this pozzed yet. Also expect all sorts of random or not-so-random images to be blurred as "explicit content" depending on who's defining that.
Yep. This has nothing to do with protecting kids and everything to do with giving them access to your sex searches linked to your name. Piss off the wrong troon and everything gets leaked.
 
Use Brave search, I've been using it for a few years now after DuckDuckGo jewed out. I've never had an issue other than when I am searching for a specific meme, I usually end up using google just for that since their AI is better at understanding you describe a meme.

I also use Yandex for reverse image searching since google has gimped theirs so hard it doesn't even work anymore
 
So Google is going to pretend to be a US school internet filter all the while keeping all those grooming websites up and running. Fitting. Definitely clown world.

And just like school filters, people will just hop onto a different search engine because no-one likes getting censored or things censored for them.
 
I have a few Google accounts and I think I turned all that shit off. I will just turn off whatever they plan on doing. I am an adult, and I don't need my titty pics censored.
 
Now in theory blurring porn is based because it will make it harder for children to look at, but it won't make a difference since Google will constantly shove LGBTQ content in front of children and will blur things they dislike politically too.
 
Oh just lovely... I Remember when they gimped their "off" safe search setting. It was pretty clear what was coming. The quicker people abandon the big G the better!
 
Back