I doubt any proof would be unedited or that we'll get proof at all. I'm not getting my hopes up. Whoever he's been talking to has been reluctant to come forward so far or we'd have proof of his activities.
I think they'd probably be concerned that they'd either be torn to shreds by his fans or that someone here would dox them. I'd love to see people come forward, though.
Don't be deterred, though; the bar for evidence here is high when you make a claim about a creator. You can have an opinion about someone and talk out your ass all day long, but if you make a claim, people will ask that you gather proof and share your findings, that way, others will know and be able to build on them.
Good luck finding stuff about Snowflake! Mister Rogers was the only soft-spoken man in a cardigan I've ever trusted.
ETA: I see our favorite special needs individual is out and about today:
@StrawberryDouche she thinks that AK is going to get Google to unmask you now because of you participating in chats on YouTube. Holy shit. They are really losing their shit over there now.
Greasy Obese Manlet, there are several steps in the chain you are not considering, as per usual.
1. Strawberry could be using a VPN that does not log. Most don't! She may have filled out a bunch of nonsense on that Google account, so it won't tell you shit. Even if you go through the court system and they find that Strawberry's nonTOS-violating interactions in other creators chats, lol, were somehow violating AK's... safety? Freedom? What is she doing? Again? What is it that she needs the information for? Anyway, even if you somehow got a court order to get them to hand over the information, that's not necessarily going to tell you anything. It's going to get you one provider, the first step in a chain of many. There is no "master vampire," just a lot of money wasted. Ask Meemaw.
2. Strawberry is allowed to participate in YouTube chats, just like you're allowed to remain unwashed and illiterate. The court would ask, why can't AK just block Strawberry? "Well, she talks about me elsewhere!" Then why can't AK just ignore it? BECAUSE IT HURTS MY SCHIZOPHRENIC, JOBLESS, UNKISSED FEMCEL FEELINGS! Well, that does sound like a personal problem, doesn't it, Greasy Obese Manlet and AK? Yes. The Courts will not stifle the speech of another, especially when you're engaging in these cracktivities. This is why when The Attic and The McMansion went to court the first time the judge told them to knock it the fuck off, because it was stupid. They're both engaged in cracktivities online. Judges don't want to deal with it.
3. It's not the KiwiFarms' fault that AK remains an ALLEGED schizophrenic, jobless, unkissed femcel. She does not put in the work, she does not seek a job, mental health services or an appropriate romantic partner in her local area. She wants to dwell within a discord full of drug addicts, obese agoraphobes, and assorted mentally unwell people with poor emotional regulation to make herself feel superior. WHICH IS FINE! Choose your own adventure! But you don't get to cry about it incessantly and demand justice for your own fucking life choices! You chose that, bitch! Enjoy!