Gov. Newsom abolishes most single-family zoning in California - You WILL live in a pod. You WILL own nothing. You WILL eat the bugs. You WILL be pozzed.

ARTICLE: https://www.mercurynews.com/2021/09/16/gov-newsom-abolishes-single-family-zoning-in-california/

In one of his first actions after surviving an election seeking to oust him from office, Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday essentially abolished single-family zoning in California — and green-lighted a series of bills intended to bolster the state’s housing production.

By signing Senate Bill 9 into law, Newsom opened the door for the development of up to four residential units on single-family lots across California. The move follows a growing push by local governments to allow multi-family dwellings in more residential neighborhoods. Berkeley voted to eliminate single-family zoning by Dec. 2022, and San Jose is set to consider the issue next month.

While opponents fear such a sweeping change will destroy the character of residential neighborhoods, supporters hail it as a necessary way to combat the state’s persistent housing crisis and correct city zoning laws that have contributed to racial segregation.

“The housing affordability crisis is undermining the California Dream for families across the state, and threatens our long-term growth and prosperity,” Newsom wrote in a news release. “Making a meaningful impact on this crisis will take bold investments, strong collaboration across sectors and political courage from our leaders and communities to do the right thing and build housing for all.”


The crisis has long been a major concern among Bay Area voters — 89% said homelessness was an extremely serious or very serious problem when polled in January 2020. And 86% said the cost of housing was an extremely serious or very serious problem, according to the poll conducted for this news organization and the Silicon Valley Leadership Group.

Newsom took office with bold promises to attack California’s drastic housing shortage and in his first year landed a budget that included a record $1 billion to fight homelessness and $1.75 billion to build more homes, launched a homelessness task force and put forward a plan that for the first time would fine cities that defied production rules. This year, Newsom has made big commitments to housing Californians, including signing a $12 billion bill to build homeless housing and support services for unhoused people.

Newsom previously had shaken up single-family zoning by signing legislation that allowed more homeowners to build in-law units on their properties. SB 9 takes that further, allowing property owners to build up to two duplexes on what was once a single-family lot.

Q&A: Here’s what California’s new SB9 housing law means for single-family zoning in your neighborhood

Slow-growth group Livable California, which has pushed back against SB 9, called it a “radical density experiment” and worried developers would use it to remake neighborhoods without community input.


A property must meet certain criteria under SB 9 before it can be developed into multi-family housing. It must be large enough, for example, and the owner must live there for at least three years before splitting the property. A study by UC Berkeley’s Terner Center for Housing Innovation found that the new law likely would add, at most, fewer than 700,000 housing units across California.

Newsom on Thursday also signed SB 10, creating a process that lets local governments streamline new multi-family housing projects of up to 10 units built near transit or in urban areas. That new legislation also simplifies zoning requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act, which developers complain can bog down projects for years.

“SB 10 provides one important approach: making it dramatically easier and faster for cities to zone for more housing,” the bill’s author, Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, wrote in a news release. “It shouldn’t take five or 10 years for cities to re-zone, and SB 10 gives cities a powerful new tool to get the job done quickly.”

Newsom also signed SB 8, which extends the Housing Crisis Act of 2019. The act, which speeds up the approval process for housing projects, curtails local governments’ ability to reduce the number of units allowed on a site and limits housing application fee hikes, was set to expire in 2025. Now it will go through 2030.


Finally, Newsom green-lighted AB 1174 — a bill that specifically targets the Vallco housing, office and retail project underway in Cupertino. The city was forced to grant Vallco special approval under a new law that fast-tracks certain residential developments. That approval is good for three years, and Cupertino officials recently said Vallco’s is set to expire this month. AB 1174 clarifies that projects delayed by litigation — as Vallco was — get more time.

“Closing this loophole will protect thousands of new housing units statewide against the whims of local opposition,” Jim Wunderman, president and CEO of the Bay Area Council, wrote in a news release. “Too often, the legal system is abused to block housing that we so desperately need. AB 1174 fulfills the intent of past housing reform legislation to speed more housing construction in California.”

--

YOU GET WHAT YOU FUCKING DESERVE, COMMIEFORNIA.
 
A&H is literally defending NIMBYism in order to own the libs.

Jesus Christ.
It's so much fun to live in a nice quiet neighborhood and then suddenly have to live with having your windows literally rattling because the neighbors just pulled up in their car with the stereo blasting. Or when their kids (and their kids' friends) won't move out of the street when you are trying to leave because they are playing basketball with the hoop they've put up on the street in front of their house and they just can't pause the game, you know. Or the fact that they don't understand how trash cans work and don't use trash bags (or the trash can lid) and it blows into your yard every day. Or when you have to close the blinds and get the kids away from the window during your son's birthday party because the cops were arresting your neighbor.

So, no. I don't want that in my backyard next door. Nobody wants that next door.
 
yeah, and? i'll cheerfully admit i don't want section 8/'affordable' housing anywhere near my backyard. it's part of why i live where i do
Part of the reason suburbs popped up in my area was the increase in section 8/affordable housing shit in the city. White flight ensued and decades later the city is a shithole and can't maintain roads, luckily they have yet to expand it to the suburbs yet, though cardboard condos are popping up in some areas.
 
It's so much fun to live in a nice quiet neighborhood and then suddenly have to live with having your windows literally rattling because the neighbors just pulled up in their car with the stereo blasting. Or when their kids (and their kids' friends) won't move out of the street when you are trying to leave because they are playing basketball with the hoop they've put up on the street in front of their house and they just can't pause the game, you know. Or the fact that they don't understand how trash cans work and don't use trash bags (or the trash can lid) and it blows into your yard every day. Or when you have to close the blinds and get the kids away from the window during your son's birthday party because the cops were arresting your neighbor.

So, no. I don't want that in my backyard next door. Nobody wants that next door.
Don't forget having to lock your door every night, or god forbid needing a gun or some weapon in your house in case the hood shows up or breaks in and tries to write your obituary. I think all people should have decent conditions and good lives, but there comes a point where empathetic idealism should run out and reality should set in. NIMBYism is just an innate response to criminals and awful net drains in general (drug dealers, crackwhores, felons) coming into your area or space, a response that insane feds and governors are trying to shake out of people because it's bad to notice patterns and you're gonna commit a domestic terrorism if you want a safe neighborhood.
 
Anyone remember Proposition HHH?

1631921064943.png
 
I like how he waited right until after he was sure his position was secure to do this shit.

Imagine paying millions of dollars for the same house that would cost less than half a million dollars in any other state only to have the California government to build a project next door and flood the community with niggers and illegals.
 
“Closing this loophole will protect thousands of new housing units statewide against the whims of local opposition,”

The whims of local opposition. Nice way to infantilize the people actually affected by these new developments.

This sentence perfectly encapsulates how the elite truly view their "constituents."
 
Nah, local regulations will just make getting any kind of improvement to your house approved by the local zoning committee borderline impossible
Remember, CA and the rest of the West Coast banned purchasing certain pre-built PCs because they draw to much power. I can image this spreading to washing machines (use a laundromat you bigot!), clothes dryers (air dry or use laundromat you bigot!), dishwashers, air conditioning, or any other appliances you want to upgrade a housing unit with. CA already has an abysmal lumber tax, so any attempt to remodel/build as an individual/small group is close to impossible (only giants like that Vallco housing in the article can do anything).

I’m lucky that I’m in campus housing right now (ancient cheap units with covered utilities), but even the big unis here are tearing them down and replacing them with newer, higher-density, complexes (that are more shitty and cost more, but look great on college brochures). Housing, while a good investment in other states, is a bad idea here (I’m going to focus on stocks and crypto while I’m living here).

At least the climate is heavenly and the Pacific Coast looks majestic as ever. Something to look at while ignoring the rot everywhere else.
 
“SB 10 provides one important approach: making it dramatically easier and faster for cities to zone for more housing,” the bill’s author, Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, wrote in a news release. “It shouldn’t take five or 10 years for cities to re-zone, and SB 10 gives cities a powerful new tool to get the job done quickly.”
Looks like this faggot kike finally got what he wanted: Stack and pack for the plebs, mansions for the (((chosen))).
 
“SB 10 provides one important approach: making it dramatically easier and faster for cities to zone for more housing,” the bill’s author, Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, wrote in a news release. “It shouldn’t take five or 10 years for cities to re-zone, and SB 10 gives cities a powerful new tool to get the job done quickly.”
Scott Weiner is the same subversive faggot who got California to decriminalize knowingly spreading HIV. Of course he's behind this too.

One of San Franny's finest.
 
Back