GPUs & CPUs & Enthusiast hardware: Questions, Discussion and fanboy slap-fights - Nvidia & AMD & Intel - Separe but Equal. Intel rides in the back of the bus.

I’ve been doing some research on gaming laptops in the ‘No Stupid Questions” thread and I think I’ve whittled an initial five candidates down to two. Now that I’ve reached this point I needs some advice from folks that know their shit.

Out of the two CPU/GPU/RAM combos, which do you think does a better job?

An ASUS - TUF (FX507ZI) 15.6" laptop with…
  • CPU: Intel 12th Generation Core i7
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
  • RAM: 16GB, DDR4, two slots & swappable
  • Storage: 1TB M.2 NVMe SDD, includes a second slot
..or an Acer Predator Helios Neo 16" laptop?
  • CPU: Intel 13th Generation Core i7-13700HX
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
  • RAM: 16GB, DDR5, two slots and swappable
  • Storage: 1TB M.2 NVMe SDD, includes a second slot
I’m hearing that the ASUS TUF is better but the GPU being a generation behind and the RAM being DDR4 are kind of making me turn my nose to it. It also doesn’t help that I’m buying a new laptop because my previous one, an ASUS TUF F15 laptop, crapped out due to a motherboard issue (which is assumed to be an overvoltage issue) and that’s making me wary of the brand.

Regardless, I’ll probably pick up one or the other But I’m leaning towards the Acer despite the price difference.
 
I’ve been doing some research on gaming laptops in the ‘No Stupid Questions” thread and I think I’ve whittled an initial five candidates down to two. Now that I’ve reached this point I needs some advice from folks that know their shit.

Out of the two CPU/GPU/RAM combos, which do you think does a better job?

An ASUS - TUF (FX507ZI) 15.6" laptop with…
  • CPU: Intel 12th Generation Core i7
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
  • RAM: 16GB, DDR4, two slots & swappable
  • Storage: 1TB M.2 NVMe SDD, includes a second slot
..or an Acer Predator Helios Neo 16" laptop?
  • CPU: Intel 13th Generation Core i7-13700HX
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
  • RAM: 16GB, DDR5, two slots and swappable
  • Storage: 1TB M.2 NVMe SDD, includes a second slot
I’m hearing that the ASUS TUF is better but the GPU being a generation behind and the RAM being DDR4 are kind of making me turn my nose to it. It also doesn’t help that I’m buying a new laptop because my previous one, an ASUS TUF F15 laptop, crapped out due to a motherboard issue (which is assumed to be an overvoltage issue) and that’s making me wary of the brand.

Regardless, I’ll probably pick up one or the other But I’m leaning towards the Acer despite the price difference.
What do you mean the GPU is a generation behind? The 4060 and 4070 are both Lovelace. I'd get the ASUS, for a gaming computer GPU trumps all, and the 4070 Mobile is a lot better than the 4060 Mobile (which is barely better than an AMD iGPU). What the ASUS does cheap out on is the monitor and the RAM, but DDR4 and DDR5 isn't a huge difference on Intel, and regardless they both have too little of it. I really would consider 32GB the minimum you should get these days. The monitor issue is more going to be a thing when doing things like browsing the web, in a game you'll be running the machine at 1080p anyway and 140Hz is not something you're going to reach on a gaming laptop regardless so the Acer offering 165Hz is utterly pointless. The Acer will render text much more crisply, which may or may not matter to you.
 
I’ve been doing some research on gaming laptops in the ‘No Stupid Questions” thread and I think I’ve whittled an initial five candidates down to two. Now that I’ve reached this point I needs some advice from folks that know their shit.

Out of the two CPU/GPU/RAM combos, which do you think does a better job?

An ASUS - TUF (FX507ZI) 15.6" laptop with…
  • CPU: Intel 12th Generation Core i7
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
  • RAM: 16GB, DDR4, two slots & swappable
  • Storage: 1TB M.2 NVMe SDD, includes a second slot
..or an Acer Predator Helios Neo 16" laptop?
  • CPU: Intel 13th Generation Core i7-13700HX
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
  • RAM: 16GB, DDR5, two slots and swappable
  • Storage: 1TB M.2 NVMe SDD, includes a second slot
I’m hearing that the ASUS TUF is better but the GPU being a generation behind and the RAM being DDR4 are kind of making me turn my nose to it. It also doesn’t help that I’m buying a new laptop because my previous one, an ASUS TUF F15 laptop, crapped out due to a motherboard issue (which is assumed to be an overvoltage issue) and that’s making me wary of the brand.

Regardless, I’ll probably pick up one or the other But I’m leaning towards the Acer despite the price difference.
The regular 4060 is hot garbage and I imagine the 4060 Mobile is probably just another outright trap option like the *050-tier cards. The 4070 Mobile is going to be a massive uplift in performance over the 4060 Mobile.

I would ask a more prosaic question - why are you considering a gaming laptop at all? In my experience, they tend to be bad at being laptops (due to sucking power and general bad build quality) and also bad at gaming (because of power limits). For the money you're looking to spend, you could build a far more capable system.

I understand that sometimes people do have extenuating circumstances - you're on the road a lot or something and you can't really make an actual desktop gaming setup work. But I generally urge people looking at this crap to think about how much they really need a laptop that can play games versus just building a compact PC.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Susanna
What do you mean the GPU is a generation behind? The 4060 and 4070 are both Lovelace. I'd get the ASUS, for a gaming computer GPU trumps all, and the 4070 Mobile is a lot better than the 4060 Mobile (which is barely better than an AMD iGPU). What the ASUS does cheap out on is the monitor and the RAM, but DDR4 and DDR5 isn't a huge difference on Intel, and regardless they both have too little of it. I really would consider 32GB the minimum you should get these days. The monitor issue is more going to be a thing when doing things like browsing the web, in a game you'll be running the machine at 1080p anyway and 140Hz is not something you're going to reach on a gaming laptop regardless so the Acer offering 165Hz is utterly pointless. The Acer will render text much more crisply, which may or may not matter to you.
I‘m still a little new to this so my retardation about GPU generations is a shown easily. As far as the generations bit goes I was getting confused between two different Acer Predator Helios Neo models, one of which had an Intel i5-13500HX CPU in it.

I’m still a bit worried about ASUS’s build quality after my previous ASUS TUF laptop died from a motherboard issue (which was either from overvolting or water damage, I’m leaning more towards the former due to me being extremely autistic about liquids near my electronics) but I’d get an expanded warranty on any new laptop I get.
Why would you buy a laptop for gaming? Seems like a bad investment.
It’s mostly for the portability, I’m trying to get one that I can use for both semi-casual gaming (think more along the lines of Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart rather than Starfield) & some minor internet browsing since that’d be what my Macbook Pro would be for. I also kind of want to wean myself off of Apple’s architecture since it’s a known fact that Apple is terrible for gaming and I have a feeling that the platform is only going to get worse.
The regular 4060 is hot garbage and I imagine the 4060 Mobile is probably just another outright trap option like the *050-tier cards. The 4070 Mobile is going to be a massive uplift in performance over the 4060 Mobile.
That’s good to know, that makes the ASUS a bit more desirable.
I would ask a more prosaic question - why are you considering a gaming laptop at all? In my experience, they tend to be bad at being laptops (due to sucking power and general bad build quality) and also bad at gaming (because of power limits). For the money you're looking to spend, you could build a far more capable system.
It’s mostly because I’m not doing “serious” gaming (basically playing some PS4/Xbox games without carrying those consoles around), some level of future-proofing, and having a nice form factor. Power isn’t that much of an issue since I’d be playing it plugged in if I have the option to and, in the off-chance I don’t, I’d play less strenuous games like retro emulators.
But I generally urge people looking at this crap think about how much they really need a laptop that can play games versus just building a compact PC.
I’d consider that but I’m not a big fan of carrying displays around without some form of protection. Building my own PC is something I’d like to do at some point (even as PC newbie I know buying pre-constructed desktop PCs is dumb) but I’d to get some shit together before considering that.
 
Starfield
Not actually that demanding a game, it runs just fine on my GPU-less ultrabook.
Power isn’t that much of an issue since I’d be playing it plugged in if I have the option to and, in the off-chance I don’t, I’d play less strenuous games like retro emulators.
The GPU is going to cost you a lot of power even when it isn't directly in use. Loads of applications you'd never think use a GPU will spin it up to full power to draw buttons or video clips on the internet. Gaming laptops are not good at gaming, and they're not good at being laptops. I'm on team "Avoid if possible" here. How about a GPU-less ultrabook at less than half the cost of a gaming laptop, and a console? No GPU is the way to go for a good laptop, and consoles are more portable than you'd think, you can bring it while travelling and plug into your hotel TV or whatever pretty easily.
I also kind of want to wean myself off of Apple’s architecture since it’s a known fact that Apple is terrible for gaming and I have a feeling that the platform is only going to get worse.
Apple aren't that bad for gaming, and the trend is actually that Apple are getting enormously better at gaming, not that they're getting worse. Macbooks have seriously good CPUs, seriously good iGPUs, and seriously good battery life. This is basically the worst time ever to switch away from Team Apple, their laptops are so much better than anything else on the market right now.
I‘m still a little new to this so my retardation about GPU generations is a shown easily. As far as the generations bit goes I was getting confused between two different Acer Predator Helios Neo models, one of which had an Intel i5-13500HX CPU in it.
The generation is generally the first one or two numbers, not anything else. iX is just the target market, with i3 being office work, i5 gaming, i7 more expensive gaming, and i9 professional (programming or light engineering simulations). Same goes for desktop Ryzen (same numbers, even), but mobile Ryzen have basically gibberish names you need to look up, they sell all kinds of generations mixed together. 13500HX means generation 13 (most recent available for laptops), product 500 (mid-tier, going from 100 to 900), and HX is "desktop mobile" (basically an idiot trap, these are ridiculously power hungry chips that belong nowhere near a laptop). For GPUs, a 4070 is product 70 of generation 4, which is low-end on desktop and mid-end on laptop. But a laptop 4070 is more like a desktop 4060, due to power limits.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Archeops
It’s mostly because I’m not doing “serious” gaming (basically playing some PS4/Xbox games without carrying those consoles around), some level of future-proofing, and having a nice form factor. Power isn’t that much of an issue since I’d be playing it plugged in if I have the option to and, in the off-chance I don’t, I’d play less strenuous games like retro emulators.
Your main issue in this regard is that the 4070M isn't a particularly future-proof GPU. A good rule of thumb is that the mobile variants tend to perform one-tier lower than what their numbers indicate - so a 4060M will be around a 4050 desktop and a 4070M will be around a 4060 desktop. Practically-speaking, this is kinda smack-dab in the middle of current-gen console territory except console versions of games tend to be a little more optimized so you'll probably notice worse performance overall.

It's just a rough spot to be stuck in imo and I worry that you won't really find it to be a satisfying use of a grand.
 
’s mostly for the portability, I’m trying to get one that I can use for both semi-casual gaming (think more along the lines of Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart rather than Starfield) & some minor internet browsing since that’d be what my Macbook Pro would be for. I

Would a setup where you can remote into more serious horsepower work? My "main" is a very weak and old kaby lake CPU I do everything light on, from posting this to running some emulation but to run intense stuff I actually remote into my much more poweful desktop. Even gaming works pretty fine that way.
 
Would a setup where you can remote into more serious horsepower work? My "main" is a very weak and old kaby lake CPU I do everything light on, from posting this to running some emulation but to run intense stuff I actually remote into my much more poweful desktop. Even gaming works pretty fine that way.
Lag
 
I’ve been doing some research on gaming laptops in the ‘No Stupid Questions” thread and I think I’ve whittled an initial five candidates down to two. Now that I’ve reached this point I needs some advice from folks that know their shit.

Out of the two CPU/GPU/RAM combos, which do you think does a better job?

An ASUS - TUF (FX507ZI) 15.6" laptop with…
  • CPU: Intel 12th Generation Core i7
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
  • RAM: 16GB, DDR4, two slots & swappable
  • Storage: 1TB M.2 NVMe SDD, includes a second slot
..or an Acer Predator Helios Neo 16" laptop?
  • CPU: Intel 13th Generation Core i7-13700HX
  • GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
  • RAM: 16GB, DDR5, two slots and swappable
  • Storage: 1TB M.2 NVMe SDD, includes a second slot
I’m hearing that the ASUS TUF is better but the GPU being a generation behind and the RAM being DDR4 are kind of making me turn my nose to it. It also doesn’t help that I’m buying a new laptop because my previous one, an ASUS TUF F15 laptop, crapped out due to a motherboard issue (which is assumed to be an overvoltage issue) and that’s making me wary of the brand.

Regardless, I’ll probably pick up one or the other But I’m leaning towards the Acer despite the price difference.

Those are both current-gen GPUs. I have an ASUS Tuf from the generation before (Ryzen 6800U + 3050 Ti Mobile + 32 GB DDR5). I'm going to assume you actually really do want one of these, so I'm not going to suggest something different. Therefore take this feedback for what it's worth. My biggest issue with a gaming laptop is heat. As a laptop, as in, on my lapboard or on the table in front of me, if I actually drive a game as hard as the computer can handle, it gets hot as fuck. A few nights ago, I was playing some gay & retarded game on the easy chair while my wife was watching some girl movie, and she noticed I had sweat running down my face. I realized my laptop was fucking boiling me alive because the game I was playing was running at 120 fps. Turned it down to 75 fps, knocked down a setting or two, and it was a lot cooler. So, in practice, what this means is that the only time I can really run it hot is when it's plugged into my dock and comfortably away from from hands & face. When actually being used as a laptop, even tethered to the wall, I have to keep the settings in a game down so that it doesn't turn me into boiled lobster. IDK if your background includes any engineering, but a gaming laptop does draw less energy than a gaming desktop, so it will generate less heat overall. It's just when that heat is in your lap, or conducting directly into your body via your hands, it gets uncomfortable very quickly. As far as gaming performance goes, so many games have DLSS now that I have zero complaints, and my 3050 Ti Mobile isn't nearly as powerful as either of the GPUs you listed there. I can run games like Diablo IV and Modern Warfare 2 at 90+ fps at good settings. Not quite maxed out, but then, I can barely tell the difference between medium and ultra in games these days.

That said, between the two, I'd recommend the ASUS for the following reasons:
  1. 12th gen i7 won't get as hot as 13th gen i7, and games aren't CPU-bound at the frame rates those GPUs will actually run.
  2. At the exact same settings, 4070 should run cooler than a 4060.
  3. There are very, very few consumer applications that are bandwidth-bound. DDR5 is needed to get good iGPU performance, though
  4. ASUS Tuf build quality seems pretty good (had mine a year, no complaints), and I've never heard a single good thing about Acer.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Brain Problems
Not actually that demanding a game, it runs just fine on my GPU-less ultrabook
That must be the PC mustards at /v/ being dumb again and me being just as retarded for believing them, even Steam’s page for the game lists AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 under the game’s recommended specs. Hell, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart has similar recommended graphics specs too (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 or AMD Radeon RX 5700).

Damn it, now I’ve gotten myself second-guessing everything.
The GPU is going to cost you a lot of power even when it isn't directly in use. Loads of applications you'd never think use a GPU will spin it up to full power to draw buttons or video clips on the internet. Gaming laptops are not good at gaming, and they're not good at being laptops. I'm on team "Avoid if possible" here. How about a GPU-less ultrabook at less than half the cost of a gaming laptop, and a console? No GPU is the way to go for a good laptop, and consoles are more portable than you'd think, you can bring it while travelling and plug into your hotel TV or whatever pretty easily.
The non-gaming stuff is more of a “last resort” thing in case my current Macbook Pro (a mid-2015 model, very horrifying) suffers some form of damage that requires serious repairs. All of the gaming stuff would be done whilst plugged in. I also remember reading something about the battery being replaceable.

As far as taking my consoles whilst traveling that’s something I generally avoid due to conflicts between screen accessibility and privacy. Using at hotels is an option (and is something I vaguely remember doing in my youth) but it isn’t if I’m staying at a family friend’s or relative’s place, I don’t think Nana Acheops would be too pleased with all of the gun violence triggering Gumpa Archeops’ PTSD.
Apple aren't that bad for gaming, and the trend is actually that Apple are getting enormously better at gaming, not that they're getting worse. Macbooks have seriously good CPUs, seriously good iGPUs, and seriously good battery life. This is basically the worst time ever to switch away from Team Apple, their laptops are so much better than anything else on the market right now.
That is something I’ll concede to, I was digging through Steam and I was shocked to see the variety of Mac games and that some of titles I recognize (Psychonauts, Yooka-Laylee, Hades, Baldur's Gate 3, etc.) are Mac-compatible. Sadly some of the games I am interested and have been playing on the older ASUS laptop aren't Mac-compatible.

But for me the issue with Apple isn't just about gaming compatibility, I'm also a bit leery about some apps being gimped on Apple platforms and some of their privacy policies (but everyone has that problem these days).

Another thing about the new laptop is that I see it, in addition to being a gaming device, as something of a teaching tool towards learning how to build my own PC. Reading up on shit like motherboards, cooling fans, PC housing, and all that jazz spooks the shit outta me. With a gaming laptop all I have to worry about is the permanent CPU/GPU build, swapping RAM cards, and adding more storage. From there I can use it a "jumping off" point on proper PC-building skills.

And thank you for the information on CPUs and GPUs, I'll keep it in mind in the future.
Your main issue in this regard is that the 4070M isn't a particularly future-proof GPU. A good rule of thumb is that the mobile variants tend to perform one-tier lower than what their numbers indicate - so a 4060M will be around a 4050 desktop and a 4070M will be around a 4060 desktop. Practically-speaking, this is kinda smack-dab in the middle of current-gen console territory except console versions of games tend to be a little more optimized so you'll probably notice worse performance overall.

It's just a rough spot to be stuck in imo and I worry that you won't really find it to be a satisfying use of a grand.
To be honest I'm fine with middle-gen specs, I own games on both the PS4/5 and Switch and I tend to not really care about the differences. If I get at least 3-5 years (with the later years seeing some lower returns due to the passage of time) of joy out of it I'd consider that money well-spent.
Those are both current-gen GPUs. I have an ASUS Tuf from the generation before (Ryzen 6800U + 3050 Ti Mobile + 32 GB DDR5). I'm going to assume you actually really do want one of these, so I'm not going to suggest something different. Therefore take this feedback for what it's worth. My biggest issue with a gaming laptop is heat. As a laptop, as in, on my lapboard or on the table in front of me, if I actually drive a game as hard as the computer can handle, it gets hot as fuck. A few nights ago, I was playing some gay & retarded game on the easy chair while my wife was watching some girl movie, and she noticed I had sweat running down my face. So, in practice, what this means is that the only time I can really run it hot is when it's plugged into my dock and comfortably away from from hands & face. When actually being used as a laptop, even tethered to the wall, I have to keep the settings in a game down so that it doesn't turn me into boiled lobster. IDK if your background includes any engineering, but a gaming laptop does draw less energy than a gaming desktop, so it will generate less heat overall. It's just when that heat is in your lap, it gets out of control. As far as gaming performance goes, so many games have DLSS now that I have zero complaints, and my 3050 Ti Mobile isn't nearly as powerful as either of the GPUs you listed there. I can run games like Diablo IV and Modern Warfare 2 at 90+ fps at good settings. Not quite maxed out, but then, I can barely tell the difference between medium and ultra in games these days.

That said, between the two, I'd recommend the ASUS for the following reasons:
  1. 12th gen i7 won't get as hot as 13th gen i7.
  2. At the exact same settings, 4070 should run cooler than a 4060.
  3. There are very, very few consumer applications that are bandwidth-bound. DDR5 is needed to get good iGPU performance, though
  4. ASUS Tuf build quality seems pretty good (had mine a year, no complaints), and I've never heard a single good thing about Acer.
That's the funny thing, I loved my ASUS laptop (Intel Core i5 + 8GB expandable Memory + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050) when it worked but this supposed motherboard issue kind of spooked me, it was just so damn sudden and it recently came out of warrant when it happened.
 
As far as taking my consoles whilst traveling that’s something I generally avoid due to conflicts between screen accessibility and privacy. Using at hotels is an option (and is something I vaguely remember doing in my youth) but it isn’t if I’m staying at a family friend’s or relative’s place, I don’t think Nana Acheops would be too pleased with all of the gun violence triggering Gumpa Archeops’ PTSD.
Could something like this be an option?
As for Starfield, you'll definitely have a better experience if you meet the minimum requirements, but the game is perfectly playable on the 780M. Graphics set to low of course, but the automatic FSR smoothly shifts resolution down in busy scenes and keeps the framerate around 40. So, you know, it's by no means great, but I find it perfectly fine, especially for an iGPU. If that sounds like enough graphics power for you, you could get the same laptop I'm using the Lenovo Ideapad Pro 5 with Ryzen 7840HS. Solid eight core processor, 32GB high-speed RAM, splendid iGPU, and good battery life by Windows laptop standards. Of course a Macbook would game even better, those iGPUs are seriously impressive.
 
That's the funny thing, I loved my ASUS laptop (Intel Core i5 + 8GB expandable Memory + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050) when it worked but this supposed motherboard issue kind of spooked me, it was just so damn sudden and it recently came out of warrant when it happened.
If you already had a gaming laptop and want another, then I stand by my recommendation. But if your heart's set on the Acer, well, might as well give that a try. Although current-gen Ryzen iGPUs are damn good.
 
Could something like this be an option?
I don't know, part of the issue is also the amount of space I have luggage-wise (whenever I travel I limit myself to a backpack) and even with a monitor the consoles take up a sizable amount of real estate.
As for Starfield, you'll definitely have a better experience if you meet the minimum requirements, but the game is perfectly playable on the 780M. Graphics set to low of course, but the automatic FSR smoothly shifts resolution down in busy scenes and keeps the framerate around 40. So, you know, it's by no means great, but I find it perfectly fine, especially for an iGPU. If that sounds like enough graphics power for you, you could get the same laptop I'm using the Lenovo Ideapad Pro 5 with Ryzen 7840HS. Solid eight core processor, 32GB high-speed RAM, splendid iGPU, and good battery life by Windows laptop standards. Of course a Macbook would game even better, those iGPUs are seriously impressive.
I'm in the US so I don't have access to that specific model. the US site has Lenovo Ideapad Pro 5s available but they're either too expensive or out of stock, the only model I'm seeing with is this one that's a part of their IdeaPad Gaming line.
If you already had a gaming laptop and want another, then I stand by my recommendation. But if your heart's set on the Acer, well, might as well give that a try. Although current-gen Ryzen iGPUs are damn good.
I'll more than likely be going for the 4070-packing ASUS TUF , I'll just get the expanded warranty in case the same malady that claimed my previous ASUS befalls the new one.
 
Mm. iGPUs have seriously taken a step ahead in the past few years, currently hovering around, I believe a 1660 or a 2060.

While those GPUs are older nowdays, there's still plenty of games that run happily on them.
 
"NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4050 Laptop GPU 6GB GDDR6"
Don't get that one. You're sacrificing a lot of money to get iGPU-tier performance. It's basically just a way to make idiots pay Nvidia for something the processor already does better (or at least equally well without sucking up a tonne of power).
whenever I travel I limit myself to a backpack
I do the same. It always throws off the people I'm travelling with, they expect me to have one of those huge wardrobes on wheels.

Fools. Travelling light gives you an excuse for a shopping frenzy!
Mm. iGPUs have seriously taken a step ahead in the past few years, currently hovering around, I believe a 1660 or a 2060.
If you're buying for a good iGPU you need to go AMD (or Apple). Next gen looks like this will change and Intel will dominate on the iGPU front, but right now their offerings are pretty mediocre.
As for iGPU performance, it depends very much on the memory. If the laptop has garbage 4800MT/s memory, the iGPU will suffer. AMD iGPUs have been memory bandwidth constrained for a long time. My laptop has 6400MT/s memory, that is what you need to be looking for. Better memory means the iGPU will produce more and better frames. 4800MT/s memory pushes the 780M down to ~2060 performance, but with good memory it can easily compete with the 4050 or 3060.
 
I do want to put a more powerful cpu in, with the socket I have I can get a max of about 50% more power for about $30 so I'll maybe order one off Ali (hopefully I can trust one that has a lot of sales), then see if I can get a used A380 or something off Facebook or somewhere. I do have a few different configuration possibilities but I don't know what would be the most efficient route. I don't want to make things overly complicated or expensive or overkill but I also don't want it to die on me.
I picked up the 12600k deal mentioned above, but up until now my Jellyfin server has been running on a literal Celeron with minimal issues, Quicksync is pretty amazing. I'm upgrading to be able to consolidate the Celeron box with my NAS, which runs on an equally pathetic Ryzen 2200g. You can go as big or as small as you want with your build. You could even go for one of those tiny Beelink boxes under $200, if your storage is elsewhere.
 
I could never tolerate a fan in something like a Notebook anymore personally. Would just bother me too much. especially if I have my face right in front of it. Yeah it used to be the standard but passively cooled devices and almost noiseless desktop fans have spoiled me.

I need a smidgen more CPU performance in my Ryzen 4650 Pro desktop. I was considering the cheaper route of just getting a 5800X3D, but losing the iGPU would kinda suck and I also need more RAM. Should I upgrade to AM5? Shouldn't I? Around my parts an AM5 socket board worth having without anything else would already cost as much as the 5800X3D and if I add the expenses for all the other parts I'd need I could get the 5800 and all the RAM I can carry. Feels kinda expensive for what it is, in the end.
 
Back