Grand Jury speculation thread

What will the next legal development be?

  • Grand Jury declares Chris fit for trial

    Votes: 458 30.3%
  • Grand Jury declares Chris a brokebrain and unfit for trial

    Votes: 203 13.4%
  • CONTINUANCE!

    Votes: 220 14.6%
  • Plea deal

    Votes: 122 8.1%
  • The US collapses, Chris escapes from jail and becomes a cult-leader

    Votes: 208 13.8%
  • The Merge occurs

    Votes: 301 19.9%

  • Total voters
    1,512
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd find it hard to imagine they wouldn't. Unless they're fine with Chris going right back and starting back where he left off.

I hope this is the end of the incest arc, and not the beginning of incest arc 2.
He can’t resume if Barb isn’t there.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tennis-Ball-Tony
one of my friends is a massive ween and keeps trying to convince me to go with him to West Virginia in a pickle suit with him for the final hearing.

If you went to West Virginia you'd be in the wrong state.

Do not do that. It's a closed hearing anyways.

It's very likely closed, since the others have been, but I don't know if anyone's confirmed that.
 
Hate to be a pessimist, but I'm sure what Chris "learned" on how to behave in court went out one ear and out the other and he'd stomp his feet again.

If he keeps doing that they can keep throwing him in jail for 7-10 days for contempt, repeatedly, forever. I really doubt the court wants to see him every week though, so they'd probably just zap him on a felony if he kept that up.
 
If he keeps doing that they can keep throwing him in jail for 7-10 days for contempt, repeatedly, forever. I really doubt the court wants to see him every week though, so they'd probably just zap him on a felony if he kept that up.
Well Chris Is stubborn af...he'd mentally smite them all down over pronouns
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dead Red
Hate to be a pessimist, but I'm sure what Chris "learned" on how to behave in court went out one ear and out the other and he'd stomp his feet again.
If tomorrow is indeed Chris pleading guilty in exchange for some sort of deal, his behavior problems are the least of what he needs to pay attention to. Judges see court behavior worse than his tbh, and have discretion on holding him in contempt if they don't want to deal with it.

They do not have discretion to accept a plea deal if defendant doesn't actually admit guilt. In order for a plea deal to be accepted, the defendant has to actually admit they are guilty of the charged crime when asked by the judge. They can't say "well I don't think I did it but I like the plea deal," "no but I want to get this over with" or any other equivocation. If that happens the plea isn't accepted and a trial will be set, and the state isn't held to whatever agreement was dependent upon the plea. (This recently happened with a capital riot defendant.)

I don't think Chris has actually had to plead guilty in any of his other offenses, certainly never to anything like the current charge. And, as all of Christory shows, he constantly tries to equivocate and weasel out of accepting responsibility or admitting he was wrong. If I was his defense attorney I would be drilling into him how he needs to respond to the judge.
 
Hate to be a pessimist, but I'm sure what Chris "learned" on how to behave in court went out one ear and out the other and he'd stomp his feet again.
My guess will be he's going to demand to be addressed by his full name, or else have the court recognize he is now Jesus Christ in some form.

Or else give some kind of speech how he's only doing this under duress, or forced, and that he's innocent, but just wants to end the whole thing.
 
In order for a plea deal to be accepted, the defendant has to actually admit they are guilty of the charged crime when asked by the judge. They can't say "well I don't think I did it but I like the plea deal," "no but I want to get this over with" or any other equivocation. If that happens the plea isn't accepted and a trial will be set, and the state isn't held to whatever agreement was dependent upon the plea.
There was a woman who plead guilty to something, then went on a true crime show and said she wasn’t guilty, she just said so because she didn’t want a trial. The judge threw out the deal. Don’t fuck around.

I don't think Chris has actually had to plead guilty in any of his other offenses,
I think he did the second time.
 
My guess will be he's going to demand to be addressed by his full name, or else have the court recognize he is now Jesus Christ in some form.

Or else give some kind of speech how he's only doing this under duress, or forced, and that he's innocent, but just wants to end the whole thing.
And insist on she/her pronouns and a guarantee that his toys are safe
 
Any weens or otherwise publicly speak of plans to try to check in woth the court tomorrow? If he is going to be released imminently we won't be in the dark for long anyways, but if he fucks himself over or something I'm wondering how quickly we'd find out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dead Red
They do not have discretion to accept a plea deal if defendant doesn't actually admit guilt. In order for a plea deal to be accepted, the defendant has to actually admit they are guilty of the charged crime when asked by the judge. They can't say "well I don't think I did it but I like the plea deal," "no but I want to get this over with" or any other equivocation. If that happens the plea isn't accepted and a trial will be set, and the state isn't held to whatever agreement was dependent upon the plea. (This recently happened with a capital riot defendant.)

It depends on how the deal is worded. You can have a deal with a nolo or an Alford as long as that was what was in the deal. Somehow I think the prosecution will not be okay with that in this case though.

I don't think Chris has actually had to plead guilty in any of his other offenses, certainly never to anything like the current charge. And, as all of Christory shows, he constantly tries to equivocate and weasel out of accepting responsibility or admitting he was wrong. If I was his defense attorney I would be drilling into him how he needs to respond to the judge.

Chris' deal had him plead guilty for the Gamestop macing incident. For the Snyder case, the deal let him make an Alford plea.

There was a woman who plead guilty to something, then went on a true crime show and said she wasn’t guilty, she just said so because she didn’t want a trial. The judge threw out the deal. Don’t fuck around.

Once you've completed any probation and the case is finalized, you're free to recant. Unless you had a terrible no-prosecute agreement in the deal that doesn't stop them from bringing new charges, in which case you have to wait until the statute of limitations expires.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back