Grand Theft Auto Grieving Thread - Yep, I've been drinkin' again...

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Favorite GTA?

  • Grand Theft Auto

    Votes: 63 2.3%
  • Grand Theft Auto: London 1969

    Votes: 59 2.1%
  • Grand Theft Auto 2

    Votes: 113 4.1%
  • Grand Theft Auto III

    Votes: 222 8.1%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Vice City

    Votes: 785 28.5%
  • Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

    Votes: 1,105 40.1%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Advanced

    Votes: 14 0.5%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories

    Votes: 81 2.9%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories

    Votes: 77 2.8%
  • Grand Theft Auto IV

    Votes: 717 26.0%
  • Episodes From Liberty City (The Lost & Damned and The Ballad of Gay Tony)

    Votes: 218 7.9%
  • Grand Theft Auto V

    Votes: 400 14.5%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Online

    Votes: 98 3.6%
  • My Mother's My Sister!

    Votes: 327 11.9%

  • Total voters
    2,755
My best friend brought over Grand Theft Auto V when it first came out, and I said I probably wouldn't like it because it's not my kind of game. Two hours in, and I'm like, "Holy fuck, I want to adopt Michael!" It's now my favorite game. Haven't played any others in the series, though.
Are you into open world games?
 
People complained that GTA IV's story was too dark, but at least it had a satisfying ending and story threads that went places.
I remember the complaints with GTA IV being mission design moreso than the story itself.

That and, you know, it took itself too seriously outside of the story as well.
 
controversial opinion

I liked GTA V

I didn't like GTA IV until TBOGT came out. TBOGT imo completely redeemed GTA IV and is actually better than GTA V itself.
 
controversial opinion
I do not like San Andreas as much as the GTA community does. The world has too much dead space. The only refinement it brought to the table was with combat.

That's not to say I didn't enjoy it. I loved the side characters. I loved Los Santos and the 90s vibe, especially on the PS2. Customization is good for GTA.

I think the first Saints Row improved on GTA: San Andreas by a mile.
 
I like SA, but it is bloated. By the time I complete the game, I don't really give a fuck about CJ. Especially since the story makes no sense to me. At the end, even without cheesing the game, you have millions of dollars and own lots of houses and businesses, including a fucking casino. You've successfully stopped the mob and made a name for yourself, but you have to back to Grove Street (during a riot, no less) to help your brother who's been an asshole to you your whole life. Um, ok, I guess?

And I like Mike Toreno as a character, but his missions are some of the worst in the series.
 
The ragdolls and car damage models are also way better.
Controversial:
IV had a better story than V.
Absolutely, V's story just didn't really do it for me. The having 3 main characters really seemed to overshadow having good supporting characters. Plus so many of the villains were just meh tier.
 
Absolutely, V's story just didn't really do it for me. The having 3 main characters really seemed to overshadow having good supporting characters. Plus so many of the villains were just meh tier.
You actually forget why the "villains" hate the main cast by the end of the game. At least I did, there were a few that I was like, "Wait, who was that?"
 
Absolutely, V's story just didn't really do it for me. The having 3 main characters really seemed to overshadow having good supporting characters. Plus so many of the villains were just meh tier.
I think that can be chalked up more to Rockstar deliberately creating fewer missions, thus leaving less time for the characters to shine.

Supposedly done to "reduce padding", but when buying masks and boiler suits count as their own missions...
 
You actually forget why the "villains" hate the main cast by the end of the game. At least I did, there were a few that I was like, "Wait, who was that?"
Yeah, like how they built stretch or whatever his name was to be some big villain for the final mission. The dude shows up like twice early game, then nothing til the end. Somehow he's one of your number one threats at that point. At least Steve Haines made sense, but it was just hit and miss overall.
 
Supposedly done to "reduce padding", but when buying masks and boiler suits count as their own missions...
And being a crane driver. And mopping. And yoga.
You actually forget why the "villains" hate the main cast by the end of the game. At least I did, there were a few that I was like, "Wait, who was that?"
I forgot about Stretch and Wei Chang even during the end. They're mentioned in passing, but just disappear.

Dimitri in IV would periodically contact you as you progress through the story. He's still around, just not present.

I felt the real villains in V were Steve Haines and Devin Weston. There was some motivation established as opposed to Wei or Stretch just being in the background.
 

Quick quirk I noticed about V's cutscenes, the characters don't react to weather. It's quite funny seeing the characters just talking outside in the rain.
 
I like SA, but it is bloated. By the time I complete the game, I don't really give a fuck about CJ. Especially since the story makes no sense to me. At the end, even without cheesing the game, you have millions of dollars and own lots of houses and businesses, including a fucking casino. You've successfully stopped the mob and made a name for yourself, but you have to back to Grove Street (during a riot, no less) to help your brother who's been an asshole to you your whole life. Um, ok, I guess?
I always got the sense the moral of San Andreas was to both open up to new experiences and make new friends and connections, whilst still remembering your roots and family. CJ establishes bonds with people like Cesar and Woozie that he never would have stuck in the hood, whilst Sweet, who can be a massive asshole at times, represents that CJ should care about the family he has and their origins from Grove Street. Ultimately, CJ reaches a compromise between progressing his own life and sticking by the family he has left (especially after Brian died on his watch, and with the loss of his mother).

CJ agrees more with Kendl than Sweet in that there is a life outside the hood, but he's not prepared to fully abandon his brother either and be a buster. And I don't think Kendl is either.
 
I always got the sense the moral of San Andreas was to both open up to new experiences and make new friends and connections, whilst still remembering your roots and family. CJ establishes bonds with people like Cesar and Woozie that he never would have stuck in the hood, whilst Sweet, who can be a massive asshole at times, represents that CJ should care about the family he has and their origins from Grove Street. Ultimately, CJ reaches a compromise between progressing his own life and sticking by the family he has left (especially after Brian died on his watch, and with the loss of his mother).

CJ agrees more with Kendl than Sweet in that there is a life outside the hood, but he's not prepared to fully abandon his brother either and be a buster. And I don't think Kendl is either.
I would have liked to have more Kendl/Cesar missions. I really like them in the series. And Woozie is the shit.
 
Quick quirk I noticed about V's cutscenes, the characters don't react to weather. It's quite funny seeing the characters just talking outside in the rain.
Which is fucking weird for how heavily scripted all the missions are. You think if they are willing to speed time forward so that they take place at a specific hour they'd account more for weather conditions.
 
Back
Top Bottom