Grand Theft Auto Grieving Thread - Yep, I've been drinkin' again...

Favorite GTA?

  • Grand Theft Auto

    Votes: 61 2.4%
  • Grand Theft Auto: London 1969

    Votes: 54 2.1%
  • Grand Theft Auto 2

    Votes: 106 4.1%
  • Grand Theft Auto III

    Votes: 203 7.9%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Vice City

    Votes: 735 28.7%
  • Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

    Votes: 1,033 40.3%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Advanced

    Votes: 12 0.5%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories

    Votes: 74 2.9%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories

    Votes: 73 2.8%
  • Grand Theft Auto IV

    Votes: 655 25.5%
  • Episodes From Liberty City (The Lost & Damned and The Ballad of Gay Tony)

    Votes: 198 7.7%
  • Grand Theft Auto V

    Votes: 371 14.5%
  • Grand Theft Auto: Online

    Votes: 91 3.5%
  • My Mother's My Sister!

    Votes: 306 11.9%

  • Total voters
    2,565
Well, I've never played RDR1, and probably never will considering Rockstar are fags who won't release a PC version because there's no online to monetize, so I'll have to take your word on that, as unreliable as you've admitted it might be.

From what I've heard the reason why we don't have it on PC is because RDR1 has horrendously bad spaghetti code to the point that porting it would be a nightmare, which is a shame since it's a phenomenal game.
The closest thing to that would be Xenia Emulator.
 
Well, I've never played RDR1, and probably never will considering Rockstar are fags who won't release a PC version because there's no online to monetize, so I'll have to take your word on that, as unreliable as you've admitted it might be.
Considering I said that based on you saying "no, that's not what happened." only to find out you weren't talking about RDR1 but RDR2...
 
From what I've heard the reason why we don't have it on PC is because RDR1 has horrendously bad spaghetti code to the point that porting it would be a nightmare, which is a shame since it's a phenomenal game.
Why am I not surprised?
Considering I said that based on you saying "no, that's not what happened." only to find out you weren't talking about RDR1 but RDR2...
Well, its entirely possible you are misremembering what he said, too, or assuming John was speaking specifically about Blackwater and not the aftermath.
 
RDR2's entire existence is a retcon for the series. RDR1 intentionally kept the backstory of John, and the Van der Linde gang vague so as to keep in-line with the spaghetti western theme of a lone gunman with a dark, and mysterious past. It's not detailed because it wasn't supposed to be.

Then RDR2 showed up, and ruined all that by introducing a fuckton of new characters that didn't exist in the first game while doing next to nothing when it comes to developing most of the ones that were in the first one, stripping John of his role in the gang, and best qualities to some new jackass, and introduce a new villain right the fuck out of nowhere who might have actually stolen both Dutch's role in being the reason the gang fell apart, and Javier's entire original character. Among many, many other things.

Tl;dr: Both games might as well take place in two different universes so arguing about what's really canon is pointless. What's canon in one game is not canon in the other. R* didn't bother keeping everything consistent because they hate this series, and wanted to write a new story about their brand-new retarded OCs. The continuity is so scrambled everything, and anything can be true. Uncle is secretly Red Harlow. Fight me.
 
The entire vibe of RDR1 is so much better than 2. It's a respectable homage to the gritty anti-hero spaghetti western with one of the best soundtracks ever. I enjoyed aspects of 2, but Bunny Tracks is correct in that it turns the RDR lore into an inexplicable cluster-fuck for no other reason than they couldn't be as edgy as 1 (one such example: Micah saying "darkies" rather than niggers. Cold-blooded, two-faced, backstabbing, cutthroat killer, but no way is he going to drop the hard R).

-RDR1 is superior
-Micah did nothing wrong
-Uncle is definitely Red Harlow
 
Well, I've never played RDR1, and probably never will considering Rockstar are fags who won't release a PC version because there's no online to monetize, so I'll have to take your word on that, as unreliable as you've admitted it might be.
Buy an Xbox 360 or PS3 today for extremely cheap if you want to play a bunch of classical games that will never go to PC. That was the era of real quality games anyways
 
From what I've heard the reason why we don't have it on PC is because RDR1 has horrendously bad spaghetti code to the point that porting it would be a nightmare, which is a shame since it's a phenomenal game.
I've played RdR1 on PS3 and it ran... weird. People on Xbox 360 had it worse, a lot worse.

-Uncle is definitely Red Harlow
If Uncle is Red Harlow then Jimmy Hopkins in Bully is James Earl Cash from Manhunt.
 
I've played RdR1 on PS3 and it ran... weird. People on Xbox 360 had it worse, a lot worse.
I have to disagree, i played on Xbox and it runned just fine

Yep. Console gaming died after 2006 (outside the 3Ds).
It died once PS4 and Xbox one happened. We still had great games up until 2013, exclusive or otherwise. Dark Souls, Bioshock Infinite, God of War III, Red Dead redemption, Just Cause 2, etc all came after 2006
 
I've played RdR1 on PS3 and it ran... weird. People on Xbox 360 had it worse, a lot worse.
I have it for Xbox, and it runs fine for the most part. The only issue is that if you play it for too long the internal memory gets fucked, but even then, you can just fix that by turning the game off for a few minutes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Green Man
I have to disagree, i played on Xbox and it runned just fine
I have it for Xbox, and it runs fine for the most part. The only issue is that if you play it for too long the internal memory gets fucked, but even then, you can just fix that by turning the game off for a few minutes.
Might have been particular units, but I remember with both RdR1 and LA Noire, some Xbox 360 players I knew encountered a fuckton of issues.
 
Derailing with RDR again, whoever said Low Honor Arthur is the better route, 100% agreed. Game was almost designed to have that as the canon choice considering just how much better the game is when you are a selfish prick

Wanted to do the "at least youre good with your camp members" role but then either Dutch or Mr. Pearson came to me with "Arthur you need to contribute more to the camp", minutes after donating a couple hundred bucks, animal parts and loot. Fucking ledger had four straight pages of Arthur's donations and theyre coming at me with this shit lol

In the end i just went with asshole Arthur, called John a deadbeat pussy, Sadie an angry dick-envying tryhard, Charles an irrelevant boring sack, etc etc, was actually friendly to Micah as well, because why not

In my mind it now makes sense why John doesnt want to talk about Arthur during the epilogue and further, dude was a dick lol
 
Charles an irrelevant boring sack
He helped build us a house how dare you-

Congratulations for being one of the very, very few people who actually went out of their way to do that. If you watch RDR2 antagonization complication videos, no one ever bullies Charles even though some of Arthur's best insults are saved for him, and he has the chance of having one of the best reactions once you wake up after getting knocked out by him.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Psyduck
Back