🐱 Grease slammed as 'rapey, racist and homophobic

CatParty


ICONIC 70s movie Grease has been slammed as “rapey, racist and homophobic” by woke snowflakes as they demand it is “never shown on TV again”.

The hit musical starring John Travolta and Olivia Newton-John was shown on Boxing Day on BBC1, and after revisiting the film many viewers felt it was out of date and hadn’t aged well.


Grease is the story of boy meets girl with a few coming of age lines and stolen cars thrown in for good measure.

It’s ultimately a fun, feel-good movie with a plethora of songs that stick in your head for absolutely ages.

However, in light of the #metoo movement, Black Lives Matter and LGBTQIA rights and awareness, lots of viewers felt it no longer has a place in today’s TV schedule.

In one particular scene Danny and Sandy are at the drive-in movie when the greasy haired lothario makes an unwanted play for his girlfriend and, awkwardly, her breast.

Taking to Twitter, one wrote: “The drive in/botched makeout session between Danny and Sandy hasn’t aged well. Film kinda glides right into song (“Sandy”) before viewers register the date rapey vibe of the scene they just saw. #Grease”

“Ahhh man. Just watching #Grease one of my favourite films and it’s so of its time. Misogynistic, sexist and a bit rapey,” added another.

While a third penned: “Damn. It seems like Danny's kinda rapey at the Drive-In with Sandy. #Grease”

The film, set in an American high school in 1959, was one of the highest-grossing films of the 1970s and has had a sequel and hit Broadway and West End show created in its honour.


But now viewers seeing the hit musical with fresh eyes and a wider appreciation and education for representation, have condemned it for racism, sexism, homophobia and “slut-shaming”.

In particular, many felt “bad girl” Rizzo, played by Stockard Channing, was condemned by her peers for having sex without a condom.

Even in one of the songs, she sings: “There are worse things I could do than go with a boy or two.”

At the school dance there is a scene where clearly middle-aged host Vince Fontaine flirts with teenage student Marty, as he also tells her there were no same-sex couples allowed on the dance floor.


One clearly angered viewer, complained: “All couples must be boy/girl? Well Grease, shove your homophobia.”

“Grease peak of homophobia,” added another.

Although the film is set 45 years before homosexuality was universally decriminalised across America, visibility and activism of LGBT individuals in the 1970s helped the movement make progress on multiple fronts.

Other areas that came under fire from viewers was the distinct lack of non-white people in the film.

One viewer wrote: “Hey, there's one non-white couple at the dance! One! #Grease”

“I caught the end of Grease, the movie, and noticed there were no black actors or pupils at the high school,” added another.

While a third penned: “Watched Grease on the BBC, surprised they let it go, full of white people.”

The film has a PG rating with a warning of “frequent mild sex references and mild language”.

Olivia Newton-John, 72, has previously dismissed claims of sexism, saying: “It’s a movie and a fun story and I’ve never taken it too seriously.”
 
I knew when they said "homophobic" they'd be talking about the "TOO BAD EUGENE!" part, and I knew when they said "rapey" they'd be talking about the whole movie, but I read the entire retarded article because I was genuinely curious what part of the movie they could be construing as racist and it's literally "too many White people = racist".
Just wait until they see the second one, where one of the songs is literally about rape by deception!
Most of the world entirely forgot that Grease 2 exists (and that's a good thing).
 
Idiot zoomers forget the world was a different place nearly 50 fucking years ago, more at 11.
Pretty sure they had moral busybodies in the 70s, too.

Grease wouldn't have had staying power if it was merely a product of its time. Clearly there is something universal to the characters and their struggles that attracted these idiots to the movie in the first place. Just because they shed their humanity and adopted Social Justice Blinders doesn't mean the movie is defective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomme Poire Peche
Yes.
sw9psw96erq51 (1).jpg
 
Pretty sure they had moral busybodies in the 70s, too.

Grease wouldn't have had staying power if it was merely a product of its time. Clearly there is something universal to the characters and their struggles that attracted these idiots to the movie in the first place. Just because they shed their humanity and adopted Social Justice Blinders doesn't mean the movie is defective.
There are some "product of its time" arguments that are objective. For example, the racists on Twitter at upset that there are too many white people in the movie. The movie that's set in a school, just a few years after segregation was abolished in schools. It makes sense for there to be few, if any, non-white people there. especially since back then America was nearly 90% white. The media would have you believe that America is and always has been at least a third black, but that's a lie.
 
Always fucking hated this movie (apart from the songs) and I spent my first time watching it wondering when the poor speccy sod was going to snap from all the bullying and gun down the whole school. That said, this is retarded. Progressives want society to become more tolerant and diverse as time goes on, yes? Which means that in the past it was less tolerant and diverse. "SHOCK! HORROR! We can't show the truth on screen! That might offend people!" OK, fair enough, you don't want the past shown warts and all. In that case let's set a movie back in slavery times where the slave owner is actually a decent human being and gets on well with his slaves. "YOU FUCKING RACIST!" What exactly is it you people want?
 
"Rapey"
So if we make Grease all-lesbian it will be extremely empowering.
This is precisely how Ocean's 8 happened. I will thank that movie for being so devoid of characteristic style that it made the original trilogy, even Twelve, look better by comparison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomme Poire Peche
A local high school showing Grease in class about 8 or 9 years ago was the first time I heard of a trigger warning, because some girl freaked out about the fact the teacher hadn’t warned the class about the ‘rapey‘ scene.
 
Rizzo taking risks that could get her pregnant or give her the clap? How dare you scrutinize that! Why it's 1959 and her parents would likely send her to some awful unwed mothers home but hey who needs condoms right?

Also, in 1959 gay students wouldn't dare come out in public, especially on the dance floor. You might as well sign your own death warrant. Folks be acting like 1959 was the current year. Totally different time period. Totally different social standards.
 
I knew when they said "homophobic" they'd be talking about the "TOO BAD EUGENE!" part, and I knew when they said "rapey" they'd be talking about the whole movie, but I read the entire retarded article because I was genuinely curious what part of the movie they could be construing as racist and it's literally "too many White people = racist".

Most of the world entirely forgot that Grease 2 exists (and that's a good thing).
HDU Grease 2 is a goddamn masterpiece and the superior Grease.
 
Do these people understand that characters, even good guys, can commit morally dubious actions? Like with the makeout scene, isn't the point of the musical that Danny is struggling to find how he should act? He's literally having an identity crisis.

Also why would having sex without a condom be a good thing? I thought sex positivity included discussing birth control and protection and if she's going to be kind of slutty, she should be using condoms. And the movie is set at a time when abortion wasn't legal iirc.
Implying that unprotected sex is risky in numerous aspects (especially with strangers) counts as "kinkshaming" in these circles and therefore not sex positive.
 
Rizzo taking risks that could get her pregnant or give her the clap? How dare you scrutinize that! Why it's 1959 and her parents would likely send her to some awful unwed mothers home but hey who needs condoms right?

Also, in 1959 gay students wouldn't dare come out in public, especially on the dance floor. You might as well sign your own death warrant. Folks be acting like 1959 was the current year. Totally different time period. Totally different social standards.
My local community college tried to open a gay student club in the late 80s, and had to close it because the students were getting attacked for, well, being gay. And the campus police and city police ignored the attacks.
It wasn't until 2005 or so that the gay student club was re-formed, and that's only the college dean has a son that's trooned out, and expects the school's health insurance to pay for said sons troon meds and the like.
 
The hit musical starring John Travolta and Olivia Newton-John was shown on Boxing Day on BBC1, and after revisiting the film many viewers felt it was out of date and hadn’t aged well.
Many viewers?

Exactly how many? If they can fit inside the gas chambers at Auschwitz and be exterminated in a single session, it can't be that many.
 
Many viewers?

Exactly how many? If they can fit inside the gas chambers at Auschwitz and be exterminated in a single session, it can't be that many.

Considering the Beeb apparently had record low ratings for Christmas this year, the number is probably lower than you think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greengrilledcheese
Back