- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
qld said:It COULD HAPPEN. My partner worked in a group home for three years. Eight men with various developmental problems. Problems with being taken advantage of, having no concept of money, delayed gratification or healthy living. Chronic masturbators. Chronic mutual masturbators. "It's their home, and if they want to do it behind closed doors, then it is their right." They had 'advocates' or family members that could relocate them or help make decisions for them. The monthly tugboats paid 'rent' to stay there, and a balance was left over for clothes, activities, and leisure. Often, the balance would grow high so they would be forced to make an extravagant purchase so their tugboats wouldn't be affected by their cash assets. A $1500 dresser comes to mind. They have days to do their laundry, and are supposed to help, but wind up using a whole jug of detergent on one load or will stand for so long in front of the washer that it's more efficient for the staff to just do it. They'll pack the dryer so tight it won't dry. I've heard of clients there wiping their ass with their hand and smearing it on the slats of the wooden shutters. And the staff cleans it.
Someone, family or adult protective could petition the court for guardianship and commit him in a flash. If he had a tv and game system to bring, then he could have it and it would be his if that's what he wanted. He would still have money to spend on vidya. The only problem for him would be the structure and counseling they would try to provide. Healthy diet, food limitations and bedtimes and wakeup calls.
If he can't manage his money and loses his house, such a place could be in his future. From the people I've seen in them, he wouldn't necessarily be out of place. But of course, he would try to keep his house for a time. Then it would get so bad, he would be committed. Then the house and contents would be liquidated, and if the proceeds are all his, such an influx of cash could be bad for his tugboat if he is committed at the time. It's a delicate matter.
No.