Petronella
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2013
Growing Around: A show written by a guy who can't write, drawn by a guy who can't draw, and voice acted by people who can't act.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm surprised this hasn't been posted yet but here's Enter's latest Growing Around script. Check out the totally original title here.
http://www.deviantart.com/art/Growing-Around-Episodes-Opposite-Day-522580421
It seems like most of the episode is Enter bitching about the school system and how horrible he thinks adults are. It's basically him trying to justify why the ridiculous rules his characters live by are supposedly a good thing. Enter is a lazy manchild, and this is his pathetic attempt to justify that. Hell, when you think about it, Growing Around itself is probably Enter's attempt to justify why he's such a manchild. Growing Around has truly become his Sonichu: it's his way to tell the world that he's a hero for living like a child and bitching about cartoons. Really, it would have been better if things didn't go back to normal at the end, and this was the finale or something. Seeing Enter's characters have to face reality was actually kind of satisfying. The bad guy from the episode, the evil president guy, is probably the closest thing Growing Around has had to a likable character. Also, Gumdrops doesn't exist in that reality, so that's a plus.It's like looking straight into his mind! This made me giddy; it all makes sense now. This is his poisoned interpretation of the real world! Having control? HAVING CONTROL! He fears that, you see? I he were in control of his life, he'd have places to go, people to see, obligations, responsibilities. King Enter I simply hates the idea of responsibility. Behind the asexuality, the victim complex, the cartoon-watching, is a lazy asshole who is so afraid of growing up that he has invented this gray, oppressive nightmare world to scare himself out of it. God, I am satisfied with myself, which now makes me reevaluate my life...
I see @NostalgiaJazzAdmirer is leaving passive-aggressive ratings like MylarBalloonFan.
What's so autistic about thinking the characters are bland?
What's so autistic about thinking the characters are bland?
The posts I rated "Autistic" aren't even the same as the one saying the characters are bland.
By your logic, how is it not? You had said use of the word "autistic" in a negative-ish word was "ableist" a while back in a post, so tell me.The "autistic" rating means you're rating them for getting worked up over trivial things, or over-analyzing/obsessing over them. Which isn't exactly the same as using it as a discriminatory term.
Then what was?Also, not the point I was trying to make.
Hence why I stopped replying to the TheRich4270 thread. It was REALLY getting off topic.NJA's 'tism is making you go off topic again, guys.
Technically any "derogatory" form of the word autistic is a made-up definiton. The term "sperg" is as well, but as Dwarf said this forum could get really off topic, so I guess I should stop here.When someone rates a post autistic, they're not referring to a disability, but the made-up definition. Actually referring to someone as some form of the word is not right no matter how you spin it.
The point I was trying to make is that the posts I gave the "Autistic" rating was not the same post that called the characters bland, which was the complaint.