Gypsies - A discussion on why they are the worst ethnic group

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
america has irish travelers, melungeons, and indians for poor itenerant groups and they're all very different in their lifestyle and criminal tendency, mostly just being things that kind of exist on a family-by-family basis that no longer really go along racial or group bylines. they avoid any large settlements and the outskirts of civilized folks like the amish so you're literally only going to run into them in small towns and places where word is more bond than law.
 
1746976467784.webp


>Live in rural, mountainous terrain, isolated from society
>Be poor, uneducated, unemployed, living in a rundown shack
>Lack of understanding of basic hygiene
>The area is so rural and isolated that you and a lot of your peers are a byproduct of incest
>Speak in a weird accent the locals find you hard to understand
>Spend your days scalping for copper and other metal to sell to junkyards
>Pretend to be sick or have broken limbs, so that you'd get more out of welfare and begging on the streets
>If all of that is not enough, trick, scam and steal
>Spend your free time cooking up moonshine that's bound to leave you blind
>Laze off on your ass, stringing together some shitty song on your guitar or other string instrument instead of working
>Be rural white trash of American Appalachia
>Pic unrelated
 
We have Mexican street vendors here but they will go away if you tell them to fuck off. But this woman was something else entirely.
Americans are use to scammers/beggars being cowards with enough cunning to disengage before a scene develops or police show up; but Gyppos escalate. Screaming. Spitting. Violence.
 
The interesting thing about Gypsies is how much of their anti-social behavior is driven by their culture rather than their biology. A white couple adopting a black will run the chance of him turning into a feral nigger anyways, but the loads of Gypsie children adopted by white middle class Americans and Europeans after the fall of Eastern European Communism in the 90s didn't really create too many long term horror stories. Putting aside the PTSD and health issues of the kids coming out of those orphanages, they mostly grew up normal. Certainly, they didn't become white collar professionals like their adoptive parents, but they didn't become thieves and scam artists either.
 
The interesting thing about Gypsies is how much of their anti-social behavior is driven by their culture rather than their biology. A white couple adopting a black will run the chance of him turning into a feral nigger anyways, but the loads of Gypsie children adopted by white middle class Americans and Europeans after the fall of Eastern European Communism in the 90s didn't really create too many long term horror stories. Putting aside the PTSD and health issues of the kids coming out of those orphanages, they mostly grew up normal. Certainly, they didn't become white collar professionals like their adoptive parents, but they didn't become thieves and scam artists either.
Yeah, gypsy culture is definitely the main reason why they're so backwards. Every once in a while a few of them escape the matrix and become surprisingly well-adjusted people. Even then it's hard for them to escape poverty because the gypsies around them are literally a bucket of crabs. They might be poor, not the most educated, but you can tell from their mannerisms alone that they're different from the rest.

Romani women who marry white men tend to be the biggest anti-gypsies you will find. They're literally Romani Uncle Ruckuses. They straight up tell their kids to avoid gypsies and behave like a normal citizen. If you know the horrors gypsy women go through growing up (such as underage rape) or just how a typical gypsy family lives, you're quick to realize why one would turn against her own people.

Their culture is really bad. Even my most liberal teacher I used to have said that gypsy kids cannot be saved after the age of 10. Gypsy ghettos are one of the most miserable places you can grow up in. It corrupts even the purest soul.
 
Yeah, gypsy culture is definitely the main reason why they're so backwards. Every once in a while a few of them escape the matrix and become surprisingly well-adjusted people. Even then it's hard for them to escape poverty because the gypsies around them are literally a bucket of crabs. They might be poor, not the most educated, but you can tell from their mannerisms alone that they're different from the rest.

Romani women who marry white men tend to be the biggest anti-gypsies you will find. They're literally Romani Uncle Ruckuses. They straight up tell their kids to avoid gypsies and behave like a normal citizen. If you know the horrors gypsy women go through growing up (such as underage rape) or just how a typical gypsy family lives, you're quick to realize why one would turn against her own people.

Their culture is really bad. Even my most liberal teacher I used to have said that gypsy kids cannot be saved after the age of 10. Gypsy ghettos are one of the most miserable places you can grow up in. It corrupts even the purest soul.
There are more well-adjusted gypsies or people of gypsy descent than most people realize, but the issue is that... a well-adjusted gypsy is hardly a gypsy at all. When the culture is so strongly defined by the negative characteristics, how do you tell somebody is a gypsy if they seem like just an ordinary bloke? Particularly since most of them in a position of acceptance are smart to keep that shit a secret, not risking to lose their job or apartment. Even if you are close friends with them or they are your blood relative, they'll still feel hesitant in discussing the topic or outright deny their ancestry. It is surreal to experience, they could play their personal music playlist filled with gypsy artists or talk about their rough upbringing and still not spell it out loud, even if most ordinary people would be able to put two and two together.

Yes, many of them do have a noticeably browner skin pigmentation, but they can also be easily mistaken for latinos, arabs, indians, etc., particularly in an urbanized setting. So they can blend in relatively easily and hide in plain sight, unless they happen to live in a strong white majority area. But in general, how can you tell some random person on the street is a gypsy and not pakistani or some shit, unless they engage in strongly explicit, stereotypical gypsy behavior?
 
I used to think gypsies were magical and mythical fortune tellers when I was a child. Then I was shocked they were real. Sadly that's far from the truth with how they truly act. :(
 
We need to send them back to India or to France or the USA.
Alternative: send all gypsies and pitbulls to Haiti, whoever wins the free for all for it will be given the tittle of warlord. Dominican meanwhile get all the money possible for a bigger wall so none of the 3 groups can escape
 
[citation needed]

It's a drop in the bucket. The sample size of 'gypsy children adopted by americans' is a fraction of a rounding error. Can't draw any conclusions regarding how deep their blood runs from this alone.
There are more well-adjusted gypsies or people of gypsy descent than most people realize, but the issue is that... a well-adjusted gypsy is hardly a gypsy at all. When the culture is so strongly defined by the negative characteristics, how do you tell somebody is a gypsy if they seem like just an ordinary bloke? Particularly since most of them in a position of acceptance are smart to keep that shit a secret, not risking to lose their job or apartment. Even if you are close friends with them or they are your blood relative, they'll still feel hesitant in discussing the topic or outright deny their ancestry. It is surreal to experience, they could play their personal music playlist filled with gypsy artists or talk about their rough upbringing and still not spell it out loud, even if most ordinary people would be able to put two and two together.

Yes, many of them do have a noticeably browner skin pigmentation, but they can also be easily mistaken for latinos, arabs, indians, etc., particularly in an urbanized setting. So they can blend in relatively easily and hide in plain sight, unless they happen to live in a strong white majority area. But in general, how can you tell some random person on the street is a gypsy and not pakistani or some shit, unless they engage in strongly explicit, stereotypical gypsy behavior?
The white trash whataboutism, your comment in another thread about "I thought whites were the ones that are obsessed with starting frivolous wars over tiny pieces of dirt" as a comment to a reply in another thread referencing the recent jeet vs jeet conflicts has all but confirmed- brown, curry smelling, poo coated hands wrote this post of yours.

No, nigger, you can tell. You can tell that if someone DOES come across your mythical unicorn of a brown skinned man outside the context of a violent crime being actively committed in a town of 20000 in semi-rural Bulgaria or Slovakia is not going to be from Honduras, or Bangladesh, or Oman. Walks like a gypsy, looks like a gypsy, talks like a gypsy, is in a country with 0.0% ethnic pakistanis and 7% of the population being gipsies, gee whiz, I wonder if it's just a ✨normal bloke✨ or a gypsy. Nobody is 'keeping that shit a secret', no fucking clue what kind of fanfiction you're trying to write.

You clearly aren't from a central/eastern european country. If you would, I'd implore you to watch that one netflix documentary series where the mutt bongman falsely accused of a murder (Raphael Rowe) goes around random prisons- you'll notice some very clear trends with eastern european ones, for example with the one from Craiova, namely that these prisons are all 80% filled with gypsies, possibly the ratio is even higher. There is no integration. There is no middle class. There is no gypsy intellectuals (with very few outliers, 99.9% of them concentrating on classical music, traditional gypsy instruments to be exact). Not every single gypsy is in the perpetual state of committing violent murder robberies 24/7 but you see a pack of 'people' that remarkably looks like jeets in Bucharest at 10pm walking home you WILL clutch your phone in your pocket and walk to the other side of the street.


Just to drive home how big the divide is. In all these countries, gypsies have the usual 'us' and 'them'. To themselves, they refer as 'gypsies' or 'roma' and to the whites as 'hungarians' or 'slovaks' or 'bulgarians', depending on the host nation. When was the last time you heard a black person born in the US refer to the local ypipo as 'Americans'? (sovereign citizen "moors" don't count) Blacks had less than 200 years and you have black academics, policemen, doctors- you don't have to be afraid of getting assigned a gypsy surgeon in Romania or being shot dead by a gypsy policewoman (they don't exist) despite them having more than 1000 years, like 6-7 times as long to fit in.
 
Last edited:
The interesting thing about Gypsies is how much of their anti-social behavior is driven by their culture rather than their biology. A white couple adopting a black will run the chance of him turning into a feral nigger anyways, but the loads of Gypsie children adopted by white middle class Americans and Europeans after the fall of Eastern European Communism in the 90s didn't really create too many long term horror stories. Putting aside the PTSD and health issues of the kids coming out of those orphanages, they mostly grew up normal. Certainly, they didn't become white collar professionals like their adoptive parents, but they didn't become thieves and scam artists either.
a number of years ago on LiveUrinal (Livejournal) there were some people claiming Romani (Gypsy) descent who lived in the United States, who were super duper into social justice and caping for their people and crying about how oppressed they were. I have to wonder if they were actually raised in literal gypsy caravans and went to University to learn the grift better, or whether they were adopted by normal people in USA and went to University with full knowledge of their backgrounds, and then got pozzed by the Commie Social Justice Professors.

I specifically recall one individual trying to debunk the "Gypsies steal" thing with "Gypsy Culture actually has strong prohibitions against theft." Yeah, but what they don't tell you is that's ONLY against their own people. The Other (Everybody Else on the Planet) is fair game.
 
[citation needed]

It's a drop in the bucket. The sample size of 'gypsy children adopted by americans' is a fraction of a rounding error. Can't draw any conclusions regarding how deep their blood runs from this alone.
Bruh, the adoptions from Romanian orphanages from 1990-2004 are well documented. That's like 30,000 kids to America, Canada and Western Europe during that period, of which the majority were of full Roma or partial Roma descent. Like I said, despite the health problems both physical and mental of being raised in a post-Communist institutional hellhole, the overall long term outcomes weren't that bad. They didn't become rocket scientists, doctors or CEOs, but they didn't become absolute human trash either.
 
Bruh, the adoptions from Romanian orphanages from 1990-2004 are well documented. That's like 30,000 kids to America, Canada and Western Europe during that period, of which the majority were of full Roma or partial Roma descent. Like I said, despite the health problems both physical and mental of being raised in a post-Communist institutional hellhole, the overall long term outcomes weren't that bad. They didn't become rocket scientists, doctors or CEOs, but they didn't become absolute human trash either.
30.000 NOT all gipsies, as you said, they were just random kids, some gipsies some not (gipsies do happen to be overrepresented in orphanages though... I wonder why) -> combined population of 600 million is a fair estimate between west europe, US, and Canada I think, likely the kids were very evenly distributed. As I said, rounding error. Romania is also the only country which had this many international adoptions in the 90s too due to their very liberal at the time adoption laws where it was all up for grabs like a bowl of candy seeing as all the orphanages were dysfunctional and they just wanted dem keedz gone, surrounding countries did not experience this phenomenon, so you can't just say 30k times however many balkan countries with gipsies there is.

Obviously importing one (1) gyppo to a rural canadian small town will not cause the vril of everyone within 500km to explode and all the surrounding whypipo to spontaneously combust, but arguing about whether it's nature or nurture is extremely asinine. Gypsies are gypsies, you make them take a bath and give them a suit, it's still a gypsy.
 
Last edited:
The interesting thing about Gypsies is how much of their anti-social behavior is driven by their culture rather than their biology. A white couple adopting a black will run the chance of him turning into a feral nigger anyways, but the loads of Gypsie children adopted by white middle class Americans and Europeans after the fall of Eastern European Communism in the 90s didn't really create too many long term horror stories. Putting aside the PTSD and health issues of the kids coming out of those orphanages, they mostly grew up normal. Certainly, they didn't become white collar professionals like their adoptive parents, but they didn't become thieves and scam artists either.
Because a lot of gipseys are rape offspring and have some white admixture.
The kid however, even with best interest will turn to alcohol, gambling and other frivolities.
 
brown, curry smelling, poo coated hands wrote this post of yours.
1747088212915.webp

you shall be touched by the poo coated fingers
No, nigger, you can tell. You can tell that if someone DOES come across your mythical unicorn of a brown skinned man outside the context of a violent crime being actively committed in a town of 20000 in semi-rural Bulgaria or Slovakia is not going to be from Honduras, or Bangladesh, or Oman.
So they can blend in relatively easily and hide in plain sight, unless they happen to live in a strong white majority area.
I thought I made myself clear here, but I guess I should elaborate further. Gypsies exist outside of the soviet block, particularly after countries like Hungary and Romania entered the EU, granting the gypsy residents EU passports, which allows them to travel all over western Europe, sometimes even regressing back to a nomadic lifestyle, that was impossible under strict border controls of 20th century. To many residents of western countries, these gypsy travel groups, coming in to find work or just to act like a nuisance, hold barely any distinction from Syrian or Moroccan ones. In 2009 alone, France had expelled 10,000 gypsies back to Romania and Bulgaria, even providing monetary incentives and free flight tickets just for them to go away. But soon after they were forced to put a stop to that.

And I presume that most people on this website live in western countries, where they've gotten begrudgingly used to being surrounded by people of all colors of the fucking rainbow. So I generally write posts in that context cause god damn, people on the internet think literally everybody they talk to is an American.

If you would, I'd implore you to watch that one netflix documentary series where the mutt bongman falsely accused of a murder (Raphael Rowe) goes around random prisons
[citation needed]
If you're gonna shit on other users for not giving proper citations, at least cite stuff yourself properly.

The series in question for anybody interested is "inside the world's toughest prisons", and the episode on gypsies specifically is episode 3 from season 3.

When was the last time you heard a black person born in the US refer to the local ypipo as 'Americans'? (sovereign citizen "moors" don't count) Blacks had less than 200 years and you have black academics, policemen, doctors- you don't have to be afraid of getting assigned a gypsy surgeon in Romania or being shot dead by a gypsy policewoman (they don't exist) despite them having more than 1000 years, like 6-7 times as long to fit in.
Oh, Afro-nationalists and black leftists are their own can of worms. To keep it brief, many blacks do view themselves as a separate entity from white Americans, occasionally even going as far as to convert to islam (frequently not even accurate interpretation of islam, if you look up "the nation of islam" cult, which had notable civil rights activists like Malcom X be a part of it). They may not pejoratively call white americans 'americans', but they do call them various other adjectives like 'cracker', 'whitey', 'honky' and probably several others. They are also prone to gatekeeping, and unless you are 'a real one' you are not gonna get cheerfully greeted if you enter their online or public spaces. In prisons in particular, all the whites and blacks tend to sit separately, away from each other. It is very clear that once the chips are down, the blacks default to sticking together with their own race, unless they were adopted by white parents or lived in some other suburban bubble, that made them isolated from the general african-american culture. I'd rather not go further on this, because you can have entire threads dedicated to groups like black hebrew israelites, that absolutely DO NOT espouse solidarity with white americans.

30.000 NOT all gipsies, as you said, they were just random kids, some gipsies some not (gipsies do happen to be overrepresented in orphanages though... I wonder why)
"It did not happen and if it did... they deserved it" Classic.
 
hold barely any distinction from Syrian or Moroccan ones
Skill issue, I guess. You need to hone your racism with some ethnoguessr it seems like if you can't tell apart a gypsy, a full blooded pakistani, an arab and some mestizo. I can always smell them a mile away even in the urbanite melting pot hellholes, especially if given context, or you see some disgusting poojet mutt being referred to as a 'czech national' or whatever.

coming in to find work
No comments here, I just love absurdist humor so I have to give this one a shoutout.
"It did not happen and if it did... they deserved it" Classic.
What do you disagree with? The original poster implied in the first reply that it wasn't an uniquely Romanian 'happening', it was. Obviously there were cases where westerners adopted from other eastern european state ran orphanages, but that particular 'gold rush' in the 90s was exclusive to Romania due to a multitude of different factors, but sure, lets change the 30,000 number to 40,000 hypothetically and include nearby post-communist countries with sizeable gypsy populations.

Usually the average percentage of gypsies (of the total population) in the case of countries like Romania, Slovakia, Hungary, or Bulgaria is between 8-11%. Let's also assume that gipsies are somewhat overrepresented in orphanages, 25% is a fair number I think, maybe marginally too high especially for the 90s. Also, it was the 90s- people who want to adopt from Kenya are outliers even today, younger, whiter children are always more 'desired' when it comes to white couples adopting and were likely even more so 30 years ago. I assume we're talking about white families here, as the question is whether they can integrate with a normal family or not. So let's go with 10% for the final percentage of gypsy children who were adopted from Romania in that certain time period. 4000. Split between many countries. Rounding error.

What, you expected a 5 year old gypsy child imported into Nebraska to bring about the demise of the American Empire? What kind of 'happening' on a national level here do you think would validate that gipsies are in fact gipsies? If they were gipsies they grew up to be gipsies, that was punishment enough for their immediate surroundings and peers in elementary school and onwards.


But again, your very first post in a thread about gipsies was 'muh Appalachian white trash'.

people on the internet think literally everybody they talk to is an American.
Yeah, most people aren't. Even if they are, I guess most haven't been to Alabama or Kentucky or wherever the fuck. I haven't met any hillbillies, nor do I care as it's likely I never will, they aren't the cosmopolitan kind to come to me and I have no intention of going to Russellville, AL to go to them.

Your retarded poojeet whataboutism in a thread about gipsies isn't going to magically sell "you are just like us, we're all pink inside!" to anyone, or at least not to anyone who has been around one for longer than 10 minutes.
 
Last edited:
Your retarded poojeet whataboutism in a thread about gipsies isn't going to magically sell "you are just like us, we're all pink inside!" to anyone, or at least not to anyone who has been around one for longer than 10 minutes.
Don't really disagree with nor have much of substance to add to your post, besides that I didn't have any expectations of a greentext shitpost of all things changing anybody's minds on the matter. Obviously it's much more complex than that. Frankly, I'm surprised it got as positive of a response as it did. It's just like... ok, I laid down bait to tease people a little, but apparently most found it amusing instead. wtf do I do with that?

Well, I guess I can add "pajeet" on the list of things people on this website decided to call me, so... thanks I guess?
 
notice who in the thread is arguing that migrants should be accepted.
that's who wants to take the place of you and your children in your society
View attachment 7354734
I'm a canoe nigger, not a curry nigger, bro. Y'all could have left us be in 1893, but you just had to have another coaling station in the Pacific, so now you're stuck with me.

In any case, I'm as anti-immigration as they come. We got a former royal palace in downtown Honolulu that reminds me what happens when you let in immigrants with no real allegiance to your nation and give them citizenship freely.
Ironic, yeah?

My points about gypsies come more from finding the intersection of human culture and human biodiversity fascinating.
 
Back
Top Bottom