- Joined
- Mar 21, 2022
Fuck, I HAVE to build one of these now, to get a license I have to answer a test, how hard is it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty easy. Questions are an open bank. No Morse Code requirement. Like $20 bucks for processing the license.Fuck, I HAVE to build one of these now, to get a license I have to answer a test, how hard is it?
Thanks Chad, All the reading in the thread got me really excited to jump into this subjectPretty easy. Questions are an open bank. No Morse Code requirement. Like $20 bucks for processing the license.
It was my introduction to HF radio. I liked it so much I bought an x6200 and the Xiegu 100W amp for it last October when I was trying to do the KiwiNet! So its a pretty robust little radio. I hauled it on vacation this weekend to do a POTAReally neat to see! It's amazing what the X6100 can provide. I oughta get one of these things sometime and then maybe a 100W amp for it.
I'm starting to look into BBSes myself, especially on HF. Has anybody worked with them before? Not entirely familiar with the scene.
Thanks Chad, All the reading in the thread got me really excited to jump into this subject
I'd encourage anyone taking the US tests to take all three in the same VE session (if there's time). When I passed the General exam the examiner asked, "Hey, you wanna take the Extra right away? You can do it for free." I said, "Sure, why not?" and promptly failed, but who cares?Go ahead and study for Tech and General. You only pay for one test but you have to take them both. The general license isn't significantly harder than the Tech license and builds off the same material. It only added 2 weeks to my studying on HamStudy to get ready. You'll appreciate the greater HF access
Passing the Tech is so easy you can memorize test bank questions on the way to the testing place [assuming they're not still doing it remotely]. If you put a couple of hours into studying the easily available General materials, you can probably pass the Extra.I'd encourage anyone taking the US tests to take all three in the same VE session (if there's time). When I passed the General exam the examiner asked, "Hey, you wanna take the Extra right away? You can do it for free." I said, "Sure, why not?" and promptly failed, but who cares?
yeah!!! the X6100 is basicall,y just a computer with a Allwinner R16 chip in it + SDR frontend, so you can run anything that targets ARM. The X6200 is the same too.So this is a ham radio running Raspbian? That’s fucking awesome.
if you want to learn code, I recommend the Koch method https://lcwo.net/courseintroBut learn code anyway, so that when some doofus calls you a "no coder" you can promptly tell them to go fornicate themselves [use the word "fornicate"] in CW.

Pretty easy. Questions are an open bank. No Morse Code requirement. Like $20 bucks for processing the license.
The nice thing about hamstudy.org is you just keep taking the practice tests and as long as your logged in it stops asking you the ones you keep getting right. So you can really focus in on the areas your having trouble with. And the question pool is open like others have said, so take the practice tests often enough and you start to know the answer just from the 1st few words in the question.Thanks Chad, All the reading in the thread got me really excited to jump into this subject
Based beyond belief. Tested it very quickly on my laptop, this is sweet. I'll test it some more when I get back home (it will be quite some time). OFDM really seems to blow classic 1200 and 9600 bauds packet out of the water for beefier transfers.There's now a TX blanking option. For full-duplex audio or loopback issues from your rig you can enable that and it will lockout the decoder from receiving your own packets that you send.
Also, there's now a new scope tab with a realtime OFDM constellation diagram that renders in the terminal, example using 8PSK:
[hot constellation action]
The standards that are currently used for APRS, AX.25, etc, and similar packet applications are arguably the worst of both worlds.Based beyond belief. Tested it very quickly on my laptop, this is sweet. I'll test it some more when I get back home (it will be quite some time). OFDM really seems to blow classic 1200 and 9600 bauds packet out of the water for beefier transfers.
Length of the radials? or am I misunderstandingThis may be another certified retard moment from me, but how far from radials do I have to be ?
oh, lol, not sure about that oneNo, literally the minimal length me and my setups have to be from the radials:
Network105 is still around on 300bps AX.25 packet, but it can be hard to use with all the VARA Winlink RMS interfering with it.Wait there are BBSs on HF? This is like finding out there is a secret world underneath the earth’s crust
the juice on that one just isn't worth the squeeze.Network105 is still around on 300bps AX.25 packet, but it can be hard to use with all the VARA Winlink RMS interfering with it.





This is not strictly true everywhere. There are certain portions in the HF bands where you can occupy more than 500 Hz of bandwidth according to FCC Part 97.221:The main constraint of bulletin board and similar operations on HF is the bullshit rule about automatically controlled stations not being able to occupy more than 500 Hz.

Shit ok I'm retarded, I had misinterpreted that. That's a lot more interesting then!This is not strictly true everywhere. There are certain portions in the HF bands where you can occupy more than 500 Hz of bandwidth according to FCC Part 97.221:
View attachment 8625389
Note the wording of "on any other frequency". That means that if you're in those listed HF segments above, you're free to blast whatever data mode you want automatically as long as it follows the 2.8 kHz bandwidth limit. You can throw down a VARA connection or even PACTOR if you've got the cash on 14.102 MHz and 7.102 MHz just fine. It's anywhere outside those listed frequencies that you have to stick to 500 Hz.
Making sure you're not stepping on somebody else is another matter, but you can, at minimum, host a fancy BBS on HF automatically as long as it's within those frequency ranges. Might be worth a shot!
Given how many times I've had my own contacts stomped on by those damn VARA Winlink RMS, I'd argue this rule is not bullshit.the bullshit rule about automatically controlled stations not being able to occupy more than 500 Hz.