💊 Manosphere Hannah Wallen - A Voice For Men contributor

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Quick question, how is writing about rape/sexual assault/etc being pro-feminism? Whether it's women or men writing it I think we can all agree that rape is pretty awful.

Another thing, why would they let her write on a site called A Voice For Men? Isn't a woman writing on the site, by nature, not the voice for men? I may be out of line but the site seems pretty flawed in their mission statement.

*shrug* Well, she was the one who used all those anti-feminist hashtags. She just wanted to take more cheap shots, I guess.

And yes, I didn't miss the irony of a woman writing for "A Voice for Men".

Like how Dobson thinks he's a champion of feminism, they both hate their own sex (feminism & masculinity more accurately), but they're not trans. They just think that they're oh-so-much better than women & men in general.

Wallen wants to be a bitch.
Dobson wants to be a sissy.
 
http://www.avoiceformen.com/gynocentrism/the-myth-of-patriarchal-oppression-in-iran/
Feast upon the MRA neckbeard logic. An alliance between basement dwellers and Ayatollahs.

I'm not one for mindlessly repeating feminist dogma, but that whole article seems to be proof of the old saying, "Patriarchy hurts men too." Pretty much all the problems faced by Iranian men stem from their conception of gender roles--men should be fighters, providers, etc. etc. etc. The only way to give men more freedom would be to loosen the grip "moral" authorities have in that country, which, surprise surprise, would benefit women as well.
 
I'm not one for mindlessly repeating feminist dogma, but that whole article seems to be proof of the old saying, "Patriarchy hurts men too." Pretty much all the problems faced by Iranian men stem from their conception of gender roles--men should be fighters, providers, etc. etc. etc. The only way to give men more freedom would be to loosen the grip "moral" authorities have in that country, which, surprise surprise, would benefit women as well.

True, but you don't see Iranian men blurt out Misandry as a problem in their country.
 
I'm not one for mindlessly repeating feminist dogma, but that whole article seems to be proof of the old saying, "Patriarchy hurts men too." Pretty much all the problems faced by Iranian men stem from their conception of gender roles--men should be fighters, providers, etc. etc. etc. The only way to give men more freedom would be to loosen the grip "moral" authorities have in that country, which, surprise surprise, would benefit women as well.

I'm sure that most of us agree that the Iranian government causes problems for all of its citizens.
It is unfortunate to say the least.

Back to the LOLs:


Bwahahahahahahahaha!

Retweet:

Not sexist at ALL, huh?

She's also bitching a lot about something called "xoxofest", but I don't know what it is.
Apparently it has to do with GG or some shit.
 
You know I always laugh at people who post the whole feminsts don't give a shit about men being raped. because i've seen a lot of sjw's actually post somethings about men being raped and saying it's fucked up. let that be a reminder even the most fucked up of indivduals are better then avfm

something tells me a lot of male rape victims would pretty much not enjoy spending any time with the avfm crowd.
 
Oh, the irony :lol:
image.jpg
 
A couple of reasons, I'd wager.

The first, of course, is internalized misogyny. Whether it's abuse from a mother or a bunch of "mean girls" growing up, some women for whatever reason believe what the manosphere says about them, and insist it must be true for all women, everywhere. It's a pity, and I can spare some sympathy for them...but not all that much. At some point any person who's been abused as a child, male or female, has to decide to either rise above that abuse or allow it to define them. The self-loathing women of the manosphere, much like its other residents--MGTOWs abused or raped by female caretakers, or their distaff counterparts, like radfems abused by their fathers--have chosen the latter.

The second reason, however, is far more calculated. Frankly, I'm torn between admiring its cunning and detesting its immorality and lack of dignity. It is exploiting the simple fact that most, if not all, manospambots are thirsty fools who'll mindlessly embrace any women who mouths the platitudes they want to hear...which makes them a nearly limitless source of both validation and cold, hard cash for any women willing to tell them that women suck. Wallen probably gets off on the laughably effusive praise showered on her by the simps (a favorite manospambot term--ironic they use it on others when it describes them much better) at AVFM. They hail her as some unparalleled sage when all she does is repackage the same tired misogynist bromides that were already old when her sisters repeated them for the ten thousandth time. If I were an attention whore, I could get as much of it as I could possibly want by baiting these rejects and giving them a tiny sliver of the validation they so desperately crave. The return on investment is truly impressive. A handful of crappy blog entries on a semi-regular basis and you'll get a legion of slavering fanboys bearing single-minded devotion usually found only amongst the thralls of famous actors or billion-subscriber Youtube personalities.

It's also quite easy to make money doing that. Women like Karen Straughan and "Dr." Helen pretty much support themselves through those means. It's astonishing just how many paypal donations you can get, or how many morons are willing to buy your laughably stupid books, if you happen to be a female who strokes their egos and reassures them that yes, women really ARE bad and useless and terrible, and you should never listen to any woman...except, of course, the woman talking to you right now, whose overpriced and under-researched drek you should shell out all your money for.

These gals certainly provide a good deal of laughter, though given the reasons described above, only some of it seems at their expense; the bulk of it at the expense of the larger manosphere which enables them.

That's quite the saturday morning cartoon villain-esque speech you got there, please tell me more about how the evil patriarchy is enslaving women.
 
squeaky male voice from behind extensive shrubbery Hi my name is Hannah!
 
Back
Top Bottom