Hansen vs. Predators - From Prime-time to 144p.

⋖ cørdion ⋗

⋖ cørdion ⋗

Coughing for Cash
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Everybody knows Chris Hansen, either from TV, early YouTube compilations, his kickstarted show of mediocre quality, or now for having his own YouTube channel.

The first waves made by his YouTube presence is probably thanks to Gus Johnson who made a satirical call-out video on the absolute state of his 'big reveal':

Since then, literally overnight, his channel had an overhaul and he's now showing his silver mane in high quality.

That aside, in this pedophile and rapist infested day and age; does this dude have a foot to stand on? He pioneered mainstream catfishing but everyone blindly accepted it because nobody likes a pedophile, but how is this gonna play out today? His website teases a new 'Vs. Predators' series, which is likely more of the same stale beef.

I've no idea of the ins and out of catfishing and US law, but he must've perfected the line between, making his business a very niche monopoly. However, considering he's a bit of a grandpa memester these days, wouldn't it be more profitable or of more cultural worth to do the usual tour of podcast appearances and talk shows? He's got quite a unique history and perspective. Hell, he'd be great on Dr Phil's podcast.

tl;dr Hansen started uploading old and unreleased content; new series to be aired, seemingly took 'have a seat' to heart; possibly trying to become relevant beyond a catchphrase.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: 1 person
As long as it keeps providing content for the TCAP community to pick apart. I could spend days trying to detail how deep the rabbit hole goes and how far the community has done to fuck with certain predators as recent as a few months ago. Just do a YouTube search for Lorne Armstrong Emma, Lorne Armstrong Ramona for hours of content. It's insane.

Fun fact, BasedShaman kicked off his YouTube career by shitting heavily on the predators until his channel got nuked twice because of it. If you wonder why his current content seems mild and maybe even a little boring, yep.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Lorne Armstrong, Mender Bug, Clockwork_PurBle and 2 others
I have no opinion on Hansen himself. He just seemed like one of those mindless Ken doll talking head drones, perhaps with a slightly swelled ego.
It was that guy he was (is?) working with that ran Perverted Justice, the guys that actually did the catfishing. I don't remember his name, but guy seemed skeevy as fuck. He looked super creepy and was a rageholic that would chimp out whenever reporters asked him any hard questions about how he operates or the ethics of it all.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin and Recoil
Travoltron said:
I have no opinion on Hansen himself. He just seemed like one of those mindless Ken doll talking head drones, perhaps with a slightly swelled ego.
It was that guy he was (is?) working with that ran Perverted Justice, the guys that actually did the catfishing. I don't remember his name, but guy seemed skeevy as fuck. He looked super creepy and was a rageholic that would chimp out whenever reporters asked him any hard questions about how he operates or the ethics of it all.
Click to expand...
Xavier von Erck, he also went by Philip John Eide.

He had a blog at one point where he talked about different things going on in his life and he just generally seemed like a sped. There is video out there of him behaving like a tard on the news and getting confronted.

People who chase down pedos are typically lolcows. They are punching down at the easiest targets, constantly angry and aggressive, but righteous about it, and dramatically pissed off because the people they dont like never get the punishments they feel they deserve.

There are tons of groups that pull the same shit that Perverted Justice used to pull back in the day, but this generation of them want to be more hands-on. All it takes is a few of their videos and you realize that theyre trying to work out personal issues with the absolute assmad they show towards the people they catch.

In the TCAP show, it was basically drawing the old guy in to try to meet the 12-15 yr old in their home. Putting aside how dumb that is, the show doesn't get that wild. Chris would interview the sped for a few minutes, he wouldn't be insulting and the guy would move on. Sure Chris had some lowkey righteousness about him in it all, but he wasn't obnoxious like these new faggots are.

Take a look at this group called "creeper catchers" they want to get in pedo's grills and stuff. They rough them up a little, restrain them, all that. Like, I get it, they're pedos, but there comes a point where this type of behavior is just a group of angry people with serious mental problems pretending to be children to encourage men to come visit them so they can work their aggressions out with them. Often they will even start talking to the pedo about how they were raped as a kid, like its some sort of retribution for them. Its pretty pathetic.

They aren;t impressive at all.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista, Clockwork_PurBle, Megaroad and 1 other person
yawning sneasel said:
Xavier von Erck, he also went by Philip John Eide.

He had a blog at one point where he talked about different things going on in his life and he just generally seemed like a sped. There is video out there of him behaving like a tard on the news and getting confronted.

People who chase down pedos are typically lolcows. They are punching down at the easiest targets, constantly angry and aggressive, but righteous about it, and dramatically pissed off because the people they dont like never get the punishments they feel they deserve.

There are tons of groups that pull the same shit that Perverted Justice used to pull back in the day, but this generation of them want to be more hands-on. All it takes is a few of their videos and you realize that theyre trying to work out personal issues with the absolute assmad they show towards the people they catch.

In the TCAP show, it was basically drawing the old guy in to try to meet the 12-15 yr old in their home. Putting aside how dumb that is, the show doesn't get that wild. Chris would interview the sped for a few minutes, he wouldn't be insulting and the guy would move on. Sure Chris had some lowkey righteousness about him in it all, but he wasn't obnoxious like these new faggots are.

Take a look at this group called "creeper catchers" they want to get in pedo's grills and stuff. They rough them up a little, restrain them, all that. Like, I get it, they're pedos, but there comes a point where this type of behavior is just a group of angry people with serious mental problems pretending to be children to encourage men to come visit them so they can work their aggressions out with them. Often they will even start talking to the pedo about how they were raped as a kid, like its some sort of retribution for them. Its pretty pathetic.

They aren;t impressive at all.
Click to expand...
Is that the Britbong one? Seems like they can only get away with so much real life harassment and a-logging because they don't have to be worried about anybody in Britbongistan having a gun or other weapon.
 
millais said:
Is that the Britbong one? Seems like they can only get away with so much real life harassment and a-logging because they don't have to be worried about anybody in Britbongistan having a gun or other weapon.
Click to expand...
theres one in Canada, they operate out of Vancouver. there is even a parody group on FB that makes fun of them. the guy who is the leader of them is getting sued for his shit.

Creep Catchers - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clockwork_PurBle
I was always skeptical of their methods and thought it might border on entrapment.

I just remember when that show first started to air I was around 18 or 19 and was on AOL. I was constantly pestered with jailbait soliciting me and wanting to chat. My AOL profile was kinda dorky and not something that should be attracting females. I would talk to them at first and they were often very aggressive. I would always try to change the subject if they wanted to hang out.
Eventually, I just had to start ignoring these rando chat requests because they were so frequent. Then, after a while (months? a couple years? can't remember) , all these chat requests just stopped.

I strongly suspected this was all some sort of catfishing op. If perverts are just coming on to young girls in chats that one thing, but if these catfishers are actually DMing people minding their own business and chatting these dudes up, I feel that's entrapment.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: millais and (deleted member)
I liked Hansen better during the days of MMMbop
 
Travoltron said:
I was always skeptical of their methods and thought it might border on entrapment.

I just remember when that show first started to air I was around 18 or 19 and was on AOL. I was constantly pestered with jailbait soliciting me and wanting to chat. My AOL profile was kinda dorky and not something that should be attracting females. I would talk to them at first and they were often very aggressive. I would always try to change the subject if they wanted to hang out.
Eventually, I just had to start ignoring these rando chat requests because they were so frequent. Then, after a while (months? a couple years? can't remember) , all these chat requests just stopped.

I strongly suspected this was all some sort of catfishing op. If perverts are just coming on to young girls in chats that one thing, but if these catfishers are actually DMing people minding their own business and chatting these dudes up, I feel that's entrapment.
Click to expand...

TCAP really did ride the line of entrapment. They say that the men always initiated the conversation, but I never bothered to look up if that was completely true.

Speaking as someone who enjoyed the investigations purely for the shitshow, I kind of fall in the middle of whether or not its entrapment. On one hand, there's no way of really knowing if they'd solicit a real minor (unless they have a prior history, which some of them did) but on the other, I don't care how persistent the minors were, but I'd like to believe that I'd be able to say no to them pretty damn easily every single time.

And if anyone is going to cheat on a significant other or go look for some nookie-nookie, soliciting minors would not be a go to for a majority of people. Even if it is entrapment, it is kind of hard for me to feel sorry for them.
 
RumblyTumbly said:
TCAP really did ride the line of entrapment. They say that the men always initiated the conversation, but I never bothered to look up if that was completely true.
Click to expand...

It's as true then as it is now. Just ask any of your female friends how fast and furious the messages on dating apps pour in.

I used to be pretty sketchy on the methods and wether or not the men are as bad as the show makes it out to be. But once you really get into the chatlogs you realise how scummy they are. If you don't feel like reading, you can listen to BasedShaman's reading of the chatlogs
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back