- Joined
- Dec 22, 2019
Because it's for children, it's not supposed to be complicated.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed. There's zero depth. Rowling is a really lazy writer, which is all she needs to be, since her books are for 10 year olds.
Neither do the adults who are still obsessed with Harry Potter. I met a woman once who told me one of the most traumatic experiences of her life was when she turned 11 and did not get a Hogwarts acceptance letter. She was dead serious.Kids don’t tend to focus as much on details or nitpick, or think in depth about how Rowling’s wizarding society model is unsustainable and archaic.
I agree I really like Harry Potter in elementary and middle school. It was a great escape for me and the lack of world building allowed me to build my own escape. But that's precisely the reason I cant relate to them as an adult. I may go back and read them later for the nostalgia.I still have a soft spot for them. They're good for what they are, children's books. The lack of world building allowed me to create my own mind palace. Harry Potter for Christmas; Narnia at Easter.
I have serious doubts as to whether JK actually wrote these toddler books. For one, her foray into adult writing (Casual Vacancy) was a fail. Kind of what raised my doubts initially.
Besides the lack of world building, the words used to describe things are just so fucking LAZY!
* muggle
* Quidditch
* Hufflepuff
It's like someone was asked to write a quick fantasy story in one class period and hand it in at the end. And the person who wrote it doesn't care for fantasy and doesn't like the time constraint so they decided to troll everyone with sheer lazy ass words right out of a bad Brady Bunch TV commercial.
And yes...it's a toddler book. Yet every day I see grown adults (many middle aged) who CANNOT reference anything outside of Harry Potter. Really tells me where their reading comprehension skills are.
The fifth book was full of puberty (divorce). But Umbridge is really fun on a superficial level, and Sirius dying is great. (Though the details are shit.) Don't want an orphaned kid to get too attached to anyone like a real family, yeah? Also, Ron sticking his hand into the jar of tentacle brains. Greatest scene in the series.It's escapism fantasy for children. Just around the time kids start having to face the reality of being a functioning person, they get delusion bait of a magical world hidden from them. And there are people twenty years later that still refuse to grow up cause is it.
I hated the 5th book even as a kid and never looked back at the franchise after finishing the last one.
another popular series for young readers - Goosebumps,
the first book came out in 1997....You're also comparing it retroactively. The first book came out in 2001. There wasn't nearly as much anime back then, much less stuff that was translated. There weren't a billion isekai or "middle school but it's dedicated to fighting/magic/gambling/whatever" shows. There weren't cinematic universes. The Nintendo GameCube had just come out. So yeah the worldbuilding was actually pretty good for the time.
The Goosebumps books even got even Chris to voluntarily read so that’s got to count for something.I defy anyone to try and convince me that Goosebumps isn't a more quality book series than Harry Fucking Potter. Goosebumps was the shit when I was a kid and if I am ever cursed to have demonspawn of my own I sure as fuck would be more likely to give them a boxed set of Goosebumps than Harry Potter. Hands down.
You're right, I was using the movie date. Where I lived it was catching on in 99-2000 I think? There was one point I was the only one in my class who had ever heard of it and within a few months almost everybody had read it.the first book came out in 1997....
back when the Spice Girls were a thing (trash) and the Beatles had just released a new single a year prior. the 90s was a whacky time.
You're right, I was using the movie date. Where I lived it was catching on in 99-2000 I think? There was one point I was the only one in my class who had ever heard of it and within a few months almost everybody had read it.