Thing is... I can't really pinpoint the end game here. Is it ad revenue? It can't be that simple. Information control for the sake of information control makes no sense either. They don't push the globohomo to push a righteous agenda, that's television drama bullshit. A lot of NGOs get money from anonymous trillionaires to push globohomo, so there's a lot of money to go around.
I’ve said it here before, but my pet conspiracy theory is that Silicone Valley is little more than the enforcement arm of the mainstream media anymore.
Journalism is one of those industries where its members seem to exhibit a great deal of hubris. A lot of them seem to truly believe that they’re doing some kind of noble work, bringing Truth™ to the unwashed masses.
If there’s one thing the internet did, it’s threaten the MSM’s monopoly on information. For the first time, average people gained the ability to broadcast themselves to others anywhere in the world. That’s what people found so idealistic and promising about the internet in the early days, but in practice, that runs counter to the journalism industry’s view of themselves as sole harbingers of Truth™. Their audience was starting to trust podcasters and bloggers and even each other over the news on TV. Horrors!
Of course, we can’t just get rid of the internet and go back everyone having to get their news from TV and papers. People know they
can broadcast to the world, and they aren’t going to deal with having that taken away for reasons. So instead, they just make the giant, corporately-owned discussion platforms the majority of them use bend to their will.
The censorship follows the same pattern every time: The MSM comes out with some narrative around some event, people inevitably take to the internet to voice disagreement with it, and then suddenly the articles start popping up about how Facebook/Twitter/whatever is a hotbed of “dangerous misinformation” and “conspiracy theorists” and
they’re doing nothing to stop it. I think these articles pretty much the Bat Signal for these platforms to start swinging the banhammer and getting rid of anyone who dares openly disagree with that original MSM narrative.
One thing that's good to keep in mind is that pretty much
all broadcast media in the US is owned by around 6 companies at this point, and most of the internet isn’t much different, with the vast majority of people using scant few websites and platforms that have even fewer owners. I don’t think it’s off-base to assume that the people who are higher up in these organizations are probably quite friendly with each other, and I'm sure another poster will be along shortly with some info about how somebody high up at Time Warner is married to somebody high up at Twitter.