Has KiwiFarms gotten more right wing or has it just stayed the same?

I think we're a pretty spicy mix, but every time I see somebody crying about Hulk Hogan needing to be banned I worry that certain parts of the userbase are going to start pushing us to be more like SA or resetera, except right-wing.
That's probably more because of Hulk's posting style than his politics, when your forum persona consists of baiting slapfights it is inevitable someone will want you banned - not because you were a leftoid or a rightoid, but because you made them mad and they're too weak to just call you a faggot and move on.
 
It becoming more right wing is a reaction to how much more faggotry the left has become over the last 12 years or so. This place is to black pilled to be idealistic to be anywhere but the center. Neither side is helpful, or offers anything other than an extra taxable middle finger to the other side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
Mostly just the same tbh, there are plenty of lolcows here that are right wing too, not just leftist nutjobs.
Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro, and many others are right wing but have a thread here. Not to mention I’ve seen more anti-sjws have threads than actual sjws themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
Not to mention I’ve seen more anti-sjws have threads than actual sjws themselves.
I think part of that can largely be attributed to a steep drop off of actual SJW content on places like YouTube following the adpocalypse or some being scared off by the anti-SJW YouTubers. Most of the anti-SJWs I’ve come across largely got their start on YouTube.
 
Most people don't even know what Authoritarianism, Right-Wing, or even Liberal really is anymore.
Voting for Trump, laughing at edgy/blue humor from the 90s/00s and hating trannies doesn't make you a conservative/rightoid, you're still the same moderate liberal/Kennedy-era liberal as you were a decade ago. The amount of actual rightoids on here is negligible.

Likewise, being a proggie doesn't mean you believe in IdPol and suck on tranny teet, that's what neoliberals are.

That all said, I'd say the site is more or less the same. "Right-Wing" is just the 21st century "Communist" slur that the establishment and it's media have popularized.
 
I haven't been here for as long as some of you, but from what I understand, KF's change over time can be described as "less about Chris Chan, more about culture war".
I expect that will change at least for a breather. Watching Gunt and Chris emerge with fresh milk has made my labor day weekend even better, and I could use a break from clown worlds onslaught.
Likewise, being a proggie doesn't mean you believe in IdPol and suck on tranny teet, that's what neoliberals are.
I think neolibs are more the Clintons of the world, the opposite side of same coin as neocons. I don't believe Hillary Clinton gives one nanoshit about troons but she loves war for profit and unchecked stock trading seasoned with treason.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
Maybe overall? But it depends on what part of the forum you're on A&N is right wing, Beauty parlor is generally left wing? with a strong terf presence. The politics don'g really matter, I just avoid it because there;s so much powerleveling in that entire section. I think the only time politics becomes overbearing is when a political lolcow gets featured, then it's usually pages of us posting about their views.
 
Maybe overall? But it depends on what part of the forum you're on A&N is right wing, Beauty parlor is generally left wing? with a strong terf presence. The politics don'g really matter, I just avoid it because there;s so much powerleveling in that entire section. I think the only time politics becomes overbearing is when a political lolcow gets featured, then it's usually pages of us posting about their views.
Terfs are basically leftists that hate trannies. Otherwise they’re pretty much the same as RadLibs in social views (pro-gay, extremely pro-feminist etc) but with an authcom view of the economy and society. Their views on sex work and porn is what gets them seen as radicals alongside obviously the trans view, but there’s radfems out there that are basically TERFs without the transgender hate
 
Might be because I disregard any tnd, ttd, or NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER posters as a rule, but i feel that most posters here are old school liberals who just want people to leave everyone the fuck alone and stop trying to control everyone.
I see so many people engage with the “classic liberal” label and it’s like, classic as in 17th century? Classic as in 19th century?

It’s vague to the point of losing practical value.

What’s the label for, “I recognize political parties as cartels, packaging everything instead of letting them be voted on individually is extremely harmful, and I’m aware that grotesque corruption is a cancer that has metastasized and spread through our system, but things would be fine if we reset to originalist constitutionalism but held officials to higher, rather than lower, standards than regular wagies”?
 
  • Like
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
I see so many people engage with the “classic liberal” label and it’s like, classic as in 17th century? Classic as in 19th century?

It’s vague to the point of losing practical value.
They are talking about more of a Bill Maher, or even a hippie liberal, where there is an aversion to things like hate speech laws and other acts to force specific moralities down people's throats. Think about a liberal/hippie from the 70s and 80s. Free spirit. Just never trust Tim Pool when he describes himself as a classical liberal. He's not. He's closer to libertarian than he is a classical liberal. When you think about classical liberal, think Ian. And now that I'm thinking about it, Joe Rogan is a VERY good yard stick for the term "classical liberal", with the only exception being his views on firearms.

What’s the label for, “I recognize political parties as cartels, packaging everything instead of letting them be voted on individually is extremely harmful, and I’m aware that grotesque corruption is a cancer that has metastasized and spread through our system, but things would be fine if we reset to originalist constitutionalism but held officials to higher, rather than lower, standards than regular wagies”?
Conservative leaning independent. The reason I say conservative leaning is ONLY because of the "originalist constitutionalism" portion, not for any moral reason. The root of conservatism is strict interpretation of laws and having the government change them rather than using reinterpretation to change the meaning of the laws. This is why you'll always see supreme court justices labeled as liberal or conservative rather than democrat or republican. It's a descriptor or their method of interpretation, not necessarily their political or moral bent.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
I think neolibs are more the Clintons of the world, the opposite side of same coin as neocons. I don't believe Hillary Clinton gives one nanoshit about troons but she loves war for profit and unchecked stock trading seasoned with treason.
Fair enough, and is caring about mentally ill men in drag and criminal niggers not the most wine-aunt suburban white woman neoliberal thing? A total non-case made into a priority because well, what else can they "fight" for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
Back