Has RULES OF NATURE ever been passed and taken down an article?

I'm not entirely a newfig but can't view it either :\
it's dumb, but you gotta collect reddit karma reaction stickers to view hidden boards, it's not just a newfag timegate. pretty sure it's 100 posts and 150 reaction score. Saw someone in the hidden board with a post-merge tag recently lmao
 
Last edited:
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Wright
The conditions of a successful removal i have seen are:
-the removal request is respectful and can generate sympathy.
-upon review of the thread, there is either A) very little content, or B) the OP has a very obvious malicious slant to it.
I've seen maybe two or three threads come down through the "rules of nature", and from what I've seen, the stuff you list is true (I don't remember seeing a thread come down because of a malicious OP, but I've only seen a few- it might have happened in ones I missed), but the biggest factor tends to be "cow shows a sincere, prolonged effort to stop being a cow"; They cop to having acted like a retard, show sincere regret, have gone at least a year or two without showing their arse, and have shown sincere effort to change- Getting work, stop whining/sperging/attention-whoring online, or basically withdraw from having a public internet presence, at all.

The few times people DO show they've made a sincere effort to change, and to stop being a cow, the Farms is generally sympathetic, from what I've seen.

[But most times it's like ILJ's request- just an attempt to downplay their own culpability. Or worse- the "you have no right to host MY photos/content/twitter spergery (that I chose to publish for public attention)!!!!" angle]
 
Could have sworn that Half-Dude (notorious car fucker guy) had his thread taken down too after he asked nicely and said he was in therapy for the aforementioned car-fucking, but I can't find it. Maybe the RoN threads sometimes go as well if they contain the information the site voted to take down?
 
Back