Has the rise in "ass guys" contributed to an increase in homosexual men? - Ass guys... hear me out.

"I have a theory: the current prevailing trend of "ass over tits" is contributing to this. Lots of men are watching ass-focused porn and getting the idea that ass is the sexiest body part. That can lead them to homosexuality or bisexuality."
Let's suppose you're on to something. That said, wouldn't men who engage in anal sex with women (men who are obviously attracted to shitty assholes) be that much closer to going full-homo?

:thinking:
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Ookoo Squad
We've been over this before, the rise of "ass men" comes from wiggerdry with White men adopting base and animalistic tastes. It might also come from increased exposure to Latinas and Blacks, both of whom tend to be a bit dumpy. (Latinas are curvy when fit, but most of them are nowhere near fit.)

But it's not faggotry, because they're not talking about buggering the woman (which, yes, is gay), they're talking about the appealing part of the woman. Doggy style is what animals do, like, you know, literal dogs. What part of the body is facing you in doggy style? The ass.

I personally think of myself as a "face man" but I would choose broad hips over large breasts any time.
 
All of the "ass guys" in question can spot the difference between fake buttons and real ones. If anything, I'm concerned with how plastic surgery has become so normalized that everything looks okay to them as long as it shows their "true self".

All of that other stuff about contributing to homosexuality is just based on agendas that are used by TPTB to maintain status quo.
 
There was a strong taboo around sodomy in general. Loosening up those norms was necessary to achieve "gay liberation." After all it was illegal for a straight couple to engage in sodomy in a lot of states until Lawrence v Texas in the early 21st century. Sure those laws were rarely enforced but that's because unlike gay men, straights don't tend to do their sodomy in public parks and movie theaters.

But while the taboo and laws existed, such things were referred to in terms that obviously marked them as being wrong, abnormal, or disgusting. Terms like "deviate sexual intercourse." It wasn't just another option you could choose, it was explicitly understood to be a sick and abnormal tendency.

So yes, the taboo was disposed of intentionally as part of the gay rights campaign. Pornographers certainly did their part in that regard. That doesn't mean that straight anal sex turns guys into homos. But it does help to make our entire society faker, gayer, and shittier.
 
Bitch looks like she's hiding a second pair of legs.
I'm glad someone else realized this. It's just more normalization of faggotry.
If you think a man's ass looks anything like a woman's I've got bad news for you.
So yes, the taboo was disposed of intentionally as part of the gay rights campaign. Pornographers certainly did their part in that regard. That doesn't mean that straight anal sex turns guys into homos. But it does help to make our entire society faker, gayer, and shittier.
I take it you're unaware that if you don't have a microdick it is indeed possible to have vaginal intercourse with a woman from behind.
 
A lot of the posts in this thread sounds like the kind of stupid shit you hear from incel loser faggots. Also the kind of cringey faggots that go around calling themselves trad and saying cringey stupid shit. Imagine being an incel and you can't even get woman that will let you fuck her pussy. Then you go on the internet and find out that there are other holes on a woman's body she will let guys stick their dicks in. Their eyes must be popping out of their skulls with rage. The amount of seething and rage must be off the charts. LOL

I will try to explain this to the retards incel fags and prudes. When a guy wants to fuck a woman in the ass it's not just the ass. It's the other stuff as well. Everything else a guy finds attractive about a woman. If you think a woman's ass and a guys ass are the same you are a fucking retard. Matter of fact you might actually be a faggot. When women have nices asses guys that are into ass want to play with them. They want to do stuff to it. The same way a guy who likes tits wants to play with her tits. Have you ever heard of titty fucking? It's basically a hand job but with tits. If a woman isn't willing to let a guy do stuff to her ass and then she might as well not draw attention to it. The more it turns them on the more stuff they will want to do with it. It's just how it works. People have been doing butt stuff for a long time. That's not going to change. No matter how much incel loser faggots retards prudes and Christian fundies seethe and rage. It's never going to stop. Stop worrying about what other people are doing. Worry about your own life.
We've been over this before, the rise of "ass men" comes from wiggerdry with White men adopting base and animalistic tastes. It might also come from increased exposure to Latinas and Blacks, both of whom tend to be a bit dumpy. (Latinas are curvy when fit, but most of them are nowhere near fit.)

But it's not faggotry, because they're not talking about buggering the woman (which, yes, is gay), they're talking about the appealing part of the woman. Doggy style is what animals do, like, you know, literal dogs. What part of the body is facing you in doggy style? The ass.

I personally think of myself as a "face man" but I would choose broad hips over large breasts any time.
Fucking a woman in the ass is not gay because it's not a man. It's a woman. I would even go so far as to say women doing stuff to men's asses isn't gay either. It's just really weird. When a guy fucks another guy in the ass that's gay. Really any kind of sexual contact would be considered homosexual.
There was a strong taboo around sodomy in general. Loosening up those norms was necessary to achieve "gay liberation." After all it was illegal for a straight couple to engage in sodomy in a lot of states until Lawrence v Texas in the early 21st century. Sure those laws were rarely enforced but that's because unlike gay men, straights don't tend to do their sodomy in public parks and movie theaters.

But while the taboo and laws existed, such things were referred to in terms that obviously marked them as being wrong, abnormal, or disgusting. Terms like "deviate sexual intercourse." It wasn't just another option you could choose, it was explicitly understood to be a sick and abnormal tendency.

So yes, the taboo was disposed of intentionally as part of the gay rights campaign. Pornographers certainly did their part in that regard. That doesn't mean that straight anal sex turns guys into homos. But it does help to make our entire society faker, gayer, and shittier.
They probably stopped because they came to their senses and realized there was no real way to enforce it. There are ways to enforce it but none of them would be tolerated in a Western society. You would basically have to live in an East German style system to enforce things like that. Are you going to have butt sex STASI in peoples houses making sure they aren't butt fucking? Then it probably won't work. That's why they got rid of it.
Came to post this. If you see a woman's ass and think "damn, I need me some bussy" you were already incredibly gay.
The use of term bussy is weird because it's gay slang for boy pussy. Asspussy makes more sense for a woman. Since you would be using her ass like a pussy. It's also kind of hot.
 

no but really: I don't think there's a direct connection there, but there is greater sexual deviancy in general as a result of our pornified culture, the sexual "liberation", and social engineering. I saw stats that said that millennials/gen Z are far more likely to be fags than past generations, and that didn't happen by chance.
 
Last edited:
gonna need a source on that friendo
Swallowing makes it even more effective.
anal sex with women
IMHO, straight men who prefer to fuck arses are bigger faggots then gay men are.
Seriously, as I see it, non-reproductive sex is for mutual pleasure and intimacy.

Taking one way pleasure from a passive, faceless 'hole' is pretty faggy. At least men have prostates, so m4m anal is mutually pleasurable.
I don't see either kind of one-way oral to be bad, as it is super intimate seeing your partner react to you without distraction.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: teriyakiburns
If you don't like women's asses, you're a card-carrying faggot. Hip-to-waist ratio and buttock dimensions are among the most identifiable sexual dimorphic traits. Even in the most abstract illustrations, an hourglass shaped torso is synonymous with "female" across time and cultures.

And you don't have to be into anal sex or "eating ass" in order to appreciate asses. I don't fuck women's shoulders, but the much narrower shoulder proportions of women is still a sexually attractive trait.
 
In my personal life I can't help but notice that the venn diagram of hardline ass lovers and men who exhibit some degree of faggoty behavior ranging from mild histrionic bitchiness to full blown bisexual flag waving is closer to a single circle than it is to two separate circles. I can't speak about tit lovers because the only hardcore tit lover I know is me, and I'm generally a massive outlier in terms of chadliness and being epic and based and a cool guy who everyone likes and wearing cool sunglasses.
 
I see where OP is going, but I think they may be a bit wide of the mark.

There's a far more compelling case to suggest that porn has been manipulated over the past decade or so as part of the ((campaign)) to normalise transgenderism.

It's not just the constant sucking of the girldick by the MSM since the mid '10s that's contributed to this mind virus that's infecting young girls and boys at an alarming rate, driven by Millennial influencers sending bathtub HRT to catboys they groomed on Discord or encouraging tomboys to yeet their teets via Instgram posts.

Why do you reckon "anal" is such a popular term on PornHub and OnlyFans is full of thots showing their buttholes? It's to try and gaslight straight dudes into thinking that assfucking is a perfectly normal and that they are a bigot if they won't touch the bussy.
 
There was a strong taboo around sodomy in general. Loosening up those norms was necessary to achieve "gay liberation." After all it was illegal for a straight couple to engage in sodomy in a lot of states until Lawrence v Texas in the early 21st century. Sure those laws were rarely enforced but that's because unlike gay men, straights don't tend to do their sodomy in public parks and movie theaters.

Yes, it's not about ass. It's about the normalization of sodomy.

Anyone can go back and see asses, along with boobs, were always a thing.

dancing-lady-1933.gif
 
If you don't like women's asses, you're a card-carrying faggot. Hip-to-waist ratio and buttock dimensions are among the most identifiable sexual dimorphic traits. Even in the most abstract illustrations, an hourglass shaped torso is synonymous with "female" across time and cultures.

And you don't have to be into anal sex or "eating ass" in order to appreciate asses. I don't fuck women's shoulders, but the much narrower shoulder proportions of women is still a sexually attractive trait.
seriously, what the fuck am i even reading here? is everyone else in this thread a god damn alien? "all these huge asses on women are making men GAY! i'm not a faggot, i like hank hill butts and it's GAY PEOPLE'S fault i think of them when looking at women's asses!"
 
Last edited:
Back