Hasan Piker / HasanAbi - Young Turk, Twitch Streamer, Stunlocked Brogressive, Cenk's Nephew, only a socialist for the money

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I never understood why people obssess over politics without ever directly involving themselves in them. I never understood why some retard giving their takes and not really enacting any sort of change has any sort of following.

A let's player making someone laugh has more of a positive impact in the world than anything Hasan could ever do yet he still amassed a huge following by talking about politics. People like Hasan, Destiny, Ethan Ralph, anyone on either side honestly, I just don't get how they became a person that people follow around. They are never going to change anything the way they do things.
 
Ironic that just a handful of months ago, Ethan Klein (H3H3) broke up his podcast "The Leftovers" and friendship with Hasan in part because of how venomously radical (to say the least) Hasan's community is, a concern that Hasan blew off when brought to his attention because he didn't see the cultivated radicalness of his viewership having a negative effect on him personally.

Highlight post from Ethan's thread:
This is really funny because the whole point of him suspending Leftovers was "to take a break from discussing Israel/Palestine"

Your browser is not able to display this video.
and yet here he is discussing Israel/Palestine with Hasan.

The whole stream is here. I can't locally archive because it's three and a half hours, but if a Kiwi with better internet would like to try then I'd be very appreciative.
Direct link: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OOFsaY_pwrI Because I've got a cold and had to cancel my plans for this evening, I'm now going to watch the whole thing.

Hour One:
The stream starts awkwardly. Ethan asks "How are you?" to Hasan, like seeing how he's doing. Hasan brushes it off and then makes a point to mention that Ethan had donated to the Palestinian Relief Fund, which has already been used to procure medical supplies. Ethan observes he'd gotten a lot of shit from Israelis for donating to the fund.

Ethan establishes he wants to talk about the one state vs two state solution. Hasan used to be a proponent of a two state solution but now supports a one state solution. Ethan thinks Israel needs to remove the West Bank settlements and "would even support" offering restitution to the Palestinians. Hasan observes that reparations are not only a moral obligation and a pragmatic choice to lessen tensions, but are required under international law. He's critical of the Israeli government's position that the other Arab states should pay a significant amount of reparations to Palestinians as it's partially their fault. Ethan says that Israel needs a different cabinet, and compares Bibi to Hamas, saying they're both obstructionists and lunatics.

Ethan asks what would need to happen for Israel to agree to a one-state solution. Hasan feels that Iran's power would need to be limited in the future as it's the only regional power that's actively anti-Israel. Ethan says he doesn't think the question was answered correctly, and asks it again. Hasan says he thinks normalisation agreements continuing with Gulf states and the same point about Iran, and feels many countries in the area are generally Western client states (Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia etc). Hasan asks what Ethan's concern is - who feels that it's idealistic that places like Lebanon and Syria would not accept an Israeli state, and Israel therefore would not be motivated to do a one-state solution. He thinks it's unproductive to have a one-state discussion as it's not realistic. Hasan feels there is a one state already, an apartheid state.

Ethan asks "do you think there'll be more or less violence against Israelis in a one-state?". Hasan insists the dismantling of apartheid and other oppressive states always has lead to less violence. Ethan argues that it's irrelevant to compare Israel to other states as it's a unique situation, and the government of Gaza is specifically dedicated to destroying Israel and killing Israelis, so Israelis would fear suicide bombings. Hasan feels that other historical parallels are important, and suggests Israeli fear of violence from Palestinians is akin to slaveowner fears of black people in America after slavery ended, and brings up the ANC's violence in South Africa and the IRA's violence during The Troubles. Ethan says he doesn't know about South Africa and wants to stick to Israel, but Hasan points out he's just furnishing examples of how apartheid can be successfully dismantled with lessened violence despite the presence of militant factions.

Hasan feels American pressure would force Israel to make a one state solution. Ethan says it would never happen, not as a right/wrong thing, but because he knows Israelis and they would never give up their country, and Israel is 73% Jewish so it's significantly different. They are descendants of holocaust survivors and are too paranoid to ever dissolve their borders as they think there'd be another Shoah. Hasan observes that the Israeli government can act counter to the wants of the Israeli population - 80% of Jewish Israelis feel there's no need to consider Palestinian lives in Gaza, yet Yoav Galant opened humanitarian passages because, in his words, America told him to. So America should shut off the money faucet and stop giving Israel munitions and effectively they have absolute control over what Israel does.

Ethan feels Israel was fighting to defend itself without help from anyone long before America got involved, and Hasan flatly says "that's not true", arguing that the Zionist militants were trained by the British slaughtering a broadly civilian force who'd been disarmed by the British. They then argue about how the weapons were obtained, and have a row about whether or not Egypt's army was great. The point is ultimately that Israel will go its own way before being forced to dissolve their borders, and they'll never go for a one-state so there's no point discussing a one-state solution.

They discuss Hamas. Ethan observes Hamas would never want peace. Hasan argues they only got prominence with Palestinians because of the failures of Oslo and Camp David, and he doesn't fault Palestinans for supporting Hamas, as Yasser Arafat wasn't offering real resolution. A secular democratic public would result in the dissolution of Hamas. Ethan asks "do you think there'll be lasting peace with Hamas in charge" and Hasan counters "Hamas won't be in charge if there's lasting peace". Ethan stresses that lasting peace cannot come first as there'll be no peace with Hamas in charge, and Hasan says that Hamas can't be dealt with by bombing Gaza, and that Hamas suits the Israeli state as it prevents any meaningful Palestinian statehood. Ethan questions who could be in charge if the PLO are seen as Israeli stooges, and Hasan argues that after working meaningfully towards peace there could be democratic elections among Palestinian people. Ethan counters that it would make sense to eliminate Hamas and then argues that a one state solution would absolutely involve more violence towards Israelis.
Hour Two:
Hasan argues that there needs to be a international presence in Israel to apply pressure to Israelis to adhere to a peace process. He observes that Europe is a "borderless utopia" even though Europeans were fighting with each other since "cousinfucker days" and yet they're now able to coexist peacefully - even though WWII wasn't all that long ago, Germany is able to coexist with other countries. Ethan points out that this was only achieved after literally millions of people died, and questions how American sanctions would impact Israel's stance on internal borders by pointing out America has sanctions against Russia. Hasan says sanctions against enemies generally don't work.

Again Ethan says Israelis would never ever accept this. Hasan argues the opposite (maintaining the status quo) requires the international community to refuse to acknowledge ethnic cleansing. Ethan points out that while in the 80s American aid represented 10% of the Israeli economy, it's now more like 1% and so Israel could easily just ignore embargos, and with the amount of tech and intellectual property owned by Israel it'd be hard for companies to sever ties. Hasan argues that the 1% is only military aid and America gives much more - the 2008 collapse was "only" 4% of the economy so it'd have a huge impact, and also the continued war with Gaza is in danger of collapsing the Israeli economy. Ethan says that it's irrelevant because Israelis are convinced that dissolving their borders will mean they all die, and they can't be convinced otherwise - Hasan states that Israelis can be convinced otherwise.

Ethan asks Hasan if he knows what it's like to live through daily suicide bombs in buses and cafés to which Hasan replies "as a matter of fact I do, because I grew up in Turkey". Ethan says "OK you experienced that in Turkey but I'm talking about experiencing it in Israel" and therefore that Hasan can't know he'd be able to deprogram Israelis because he doesn't understand Israelis. Hasan says he believes if the West support the moral cause then Israel will be unable to sustain an apartheid regime and so Israelis will be forced to change, and he'll always support the moral cause. Ethan once again reiterates he also supports the moral cause and he's just talking pragmatics (he very clearly doesn't agree with the morality of a one-state solution but has repeatedly framed it as "yeah but it could never happen even though it totally should"). He mentions that Hasan's chat is being psychotic so Hasan tells him not to look at chat.

Ethan addressing the "seething" members of the audience that he's telling them the reality of the situation and people need to reckon with the reality of the situation that a one state solution is impossible because the Israelis will never agree to it and can't be forced into it, and that talking about a one state solution is not a meaningful or productive conversation. He observes Russian sanctions increased the resolve of Russians, but Hasan reiterates that sanctions only work against allies. Ethan claims there's no evidence and Hasan points to South Africa. Ethan says Israel isn't like apartheid South Africa because Israelis all believe they'll be killed and were fighting for their survival; Hasan says that was also what white South Africans believed, and that this is what all oppressors believe will happen to them if that oppression is not maintained, but that never happens. Ethan also says geopolitics is too different now. Ethan says if forced to dissolve their borders, Israel will use their nukes. Hasan says this is like saying we can't raise taxes on the wealthy because they'll just pull their wealth out. Ethan says he only brings up the nuclear option because he thinks the only way a one-state solution will be achieved is as a consequence of all out war, and in that scenario Israel nukes everyone. Then they start arguing if sanctions would work again. Ethan says people underestimate what Israel means to Israelis, then makes a weird joke pretending to confuse BDS with the k-pop group BTS.

Ethan declares they're at an impasse. Looking at a two state solution, there's so many settlers in the West Bank now and Bibi has caused significant damage to peace by encouraging the settlers (who he characterises as psychotic villains). Hasan agrees, observing that the only time Israel has dismantled settlements was when they pulled out of Gaza, and those people got resettled into the West Bank anyway, and this is why a one-state solution is required because Israel is already a defacto one state. Ethan asks Hasan if this means integrating Hamas into Israel's government. Hasan talks about the quality of life of people in other countries (e.g. Kurds in Turkey, who he feels deserve a nation) and how these bad scenarios would still be massive improvements for Palestinians currently. Ethan says Hasan has made him consider ways in which a one-state solution could be possible in like 50 years, but he thinks pro-Palestine people don't understand the reality of the situation. Hasan agrees that the rhetoric in Israel is incredibly violent. Ethan states "is apartheid good or bad" is an incredibly easy question to answer, but deciding what to do about it is the hard part. Hasan argues that a lot of people don't think that's an easy question to answer because people don't acknowledge it's apartheid and frame it as Israel defending itself from Hamas, not realising that this violent retribution causes more violence down the line.

Hasan asks him what solution he supports and why. Ethan says a two-state solution is the most pragmatic solution. Hasan asks how Ethan would propose removing the settlers from occupied territories, and Ethan suggests using force or just telling them "you're on your own now, this is no longer our territory", which he concedes would result in incredible amounts of violence. Hasan starts observing that a two state solution is just a way for Israel to continue to dangle peace negotiations which buys them time to displace Palestinians, so Ethan interjects "do you want me to answer the question you asked". He says maybe there can be a train connecting Gaza to the West Bank, and also he'd be in favour of some kind of reparations, and that Israel might agree to this if "the vibes were right". He does think even this seems far fetched because the settler situation just ruins the whole thing. Hasan starts explaining the structure of the West Bank to which Ethan says "I know, I know, it's horrible, it's apartheid".

Ethan again reiterates that maybe a one-state solution is maybe possible in 50 years after sustained peace, but even in that scenario there's still going to be Zionist settlers that the Palestinians will rightfully want to kill. Hasan says we deal with domestic terrorists through the court system, and he's not saying that everyone's going to hold hands and live in perfect peace in a one-state, but Zionist and Islamic Fundamentalist terrorists will just go to jail because most people just want to live their lives. He says the settlers are why he doesn't believe in a two-state solution because you can't move that many people, but in a one-state it won't matter so much because the Palestinians can circulate freely, and also he realises that the Israeli government cares more about expelling Palestinians than the safety and security of Israelis.

Ethan asks Hasan what he thinks Israel should have done in response to October 7th. Hasan says establishing security in the southern regions and oust Bibi from power. Ethan points out that this is essentially saying that in response to a terrorist attack, Israel should have dismantled its government. Hasan says yes, to do it democratically, and then Israel should have engaged in a hostage release scheme. They start having a back and forth because Hasan says "talking to people who are more conservative than you" which Ethan takes to mean that Hasan is calling him conservative, and Hasan establishes he doesn't think Ethan's a reactionary which is why he's not yelling and shouting and instead is having a normal conversation because he knows Ethan has a lot of empathy for Palestinians.

Ethan complains that a solid percentage of Hasan's fan base have said awful things about him, and he doesn't understand what he's done to deserve that level of hate other than say that Hamas are terrorists, and he doesn't understand why that's in contention. He says he's even been nudged more towards a one state solution so he doesn't know what sort of allyship people are looking for. Addressing the audience he questions how any meaningful conversation can ever happen when even someone like him is considered too Zionist to talk to. Hasan agrees and says he's told people they need to make a broad coalition if they want to achieve changes. Ethan observes they've been talking for two hours and they could have done a podcast. Hasan says he'd been saying he wanted to do it, and Ethan was the one who said no because he was sick.

Ethan decides he wants to talk about "From the river to the sea" and why it makes Jews uncomfortable. Hasan has to go pee, so Ethan starts plugging the Teddy Fresh Black Friday sale. He then complains he doesn't like talking about these topics because he gets so much hate. Chat asks if Teddy Fresh uses slave labour. Hasan comes back and brings up how Ethan wanted to talk about "From the river to the sea". Ethan says the worst interpretation of the phrase from people like Hamas is killing all the Jews in Israel, but he knows that's not what most people mean when they say that. The best interpretation is a one state solution and the peaceful dissolution of the state of Israel, but most Israelis see that as meaning they'd all die in a genocide because that's what they think would happen in a one state solution. Also the phrase has a long history of being used by terrorists. He observes that when a minority tells you they're offended by something, usually leftists will listen because it's not their place to argue. Jews are 60% of the hate crimes and he finds it weird that people argue with Jews. He suggests it's like the Confederate flag where not everybody who uses it is racist, but if a black person says they're uncomfortable with it you're not going to argue with them. He says it doesn't seem fair.
Hour Three
Hasan acknowledges that "From The River to The Sea" originated with the PFLP. The slogan has always been used as a call for emancipation and not antisemitism. Hamas adopted it as their slogan because it was the slogan of Palestinian liberation but the meaning of the slogan didn't change just because it was co-opted a militant marginal faction. Ethan asks "so why does it makes it ok to argue with a group that makes up 80% of all hate crimes" (I thought it was 60% just now, Ethan...). Hasan says it's because Palestinians are the oppressed party against the state of Israel, which in itself does not represent the interests of Jews and falsely conflates its goals with the interests of Jews. Jewish people themselves who are involved in anti-Zionism will say "from the river to the sea". Ethan asks "you shouldn't be offended by it because some Israelis say it?" and Hasan points out that Jews using the slogan means it's not about anti-Semitism, because if it was then they wouldn't use it. Ethan says that there were Jewish collaborators with Nazis. Hasan says "please, don't tell me Jews' Voice For Peace are akin to Kapos". He says there's a broader point that Palestinian liberation is just, while the Confederacy was not.

Ethan says Jews at large don't like the term. Hasan disagrees, so Ethan questions him how he can even say what Jews think. "How can you speak for my entire ethnic group, I find that really interesting", and then asks him how many Jews he's polled to form that opinion. Hasan says it doesn't matter if Jews find it offensive, so Ethan goes "It doesn't matter if a minority group find something anti-Semetic?". Hasan says it's not about Jews, it's about Israel, and Ethan counters that although talking about a one state solution is more feasible to him having discussed it, when Jews hear calls for a one-state solution, they assume this will mean the mass genocide of Jews. Hasan says Israel has all the power so he's going to listen to Palestinian voices. Ethan says if a phrase has been co-opted by terrorists then people should back off using it.

Hasan points out that people claim calling for a ceasefire is anti-semetic and after a certain point you have to concede that this is a disingenuous approach to crush dissent. Ethan argues that doubling down on using a phrase that Jews feel is calling for their genocide is antithetical to constructive discussion. Hasan says he won't make concessions that hold no historic weight and he believes Palestinians when they say what the term means. Ethan objects and says there are people who use the phrase to call for the death of all Jews, and so Jews are within their rights to object to it, and he finds it interesting that Jews are the only minority group that people are prepared to say "fuck you" to. Hasan counters that Muslims are a minority group too, and Palestinians are an even smaller minority group, and the larger conversation is Anti-Zionists vs Zionist Christians. People don't call you Islamophobic for criticising Saudi Arabia, but they call you anti-semetic when you criticise Israel. He thinks people use that argument about "From The River..." cynically. He feels that arguing about the optics of the phrase calling for Palestinian liberation when 11,000 Palestinians have been slaughtered is bad.

Ethan complains this is making him look bad, and the objections to the phrase have nothing to do with the actions of Israel. The argument then devolves into Hamas changing its charter and removing references to Jew killing, but - Hasan concedes - there will still be anti-semites in Hamas. Ethan asks him if he thinks there's anyone in Hamas who isn't an anti-semite and Hasan says there are and Ethan can yell at him for thinking that if he wants but it's true. There's 18 year olds who don't know anything but bombs exploding over their heads and Hamas is simply a means of violent retaliation. People don't operate on good and bad, they operate on "this bomb blew up my family, I hate this fucking state".

Ethan makes Hasan play the clip of that guy calling for a thousand October 7ths. Hasan starts reading out the subtitles and Ethan goes "lalala can't hear you", as a joke that people ignore antisemitism, and then insists he wants people to see it. Hasan points out he's shown this clip on his stream already. "Do you think every single person watching right now has seen every second of your stream?" Ethan asks. They start playing the clip again and Ethan keeps talking over it and interrupting Hasan. Hasan points out that for every single person in Hamas saying this sort of bloodthirsty stuff there's the same number in Israel saying it. Ethan insists he's not saying it to defend Israel, he's just illustrating why Jews are uncomfortable with the phrase "from the river to the sea". Hasan stresses that the guy does not speak for Palestinians or even the whole of Hamas because Hamas has multiple factions. Ethan asks "at what point is this phrase allowed to be offensive?", then his son wanders in and he talks to him for a bit while Hasan waits. Hasan then says that people can't tailor their optics to make concessions to people invested in upholding an unjust structure.

Ethan says "I'm assuming you don't believe Israel has a right to exist". Hasan says "I don't believe Israel has a right to exist as an apartheid state". Ethan argues that the slogan is calling for the destruction of Israel, and Hasan reiterates that the PFLP who used to the slogan specifically wanted the Zionist state dismantled to create a secular state of Jews and Muslims and everyone else in the lands of Israel. Hasan quickly dips out to get food (his Dad apparently made him some food) so Ethan plugs the Teddy Fresh Black Friday sale again. Hasan observes that a lot of Israelis think that a single secular state would mean genocide but Israeli concerns have been overrepresented. Ethan agrees that Palestinians are the ones being wronged, but does that mean they've got a right to use phrases with impunity? What if they said "Israel doesn't exist", would that be ok? Hasan feels this depends on context.

Ethan says he's just telling the Jewish perspective, and Hasan tells him he's not saying the Jewish perspective because Jews aren't a monolith, and then they argue about how many anti-Zionist Jews use the phrase, and then Hasan says "I don't concern myself with what Jewish people think about a particular slogan when I'm talking about the historical context of the slogan". He asks if Ethan thinks that anti-Zionist Jews his knows and respects would use a phrase that's calling for an ethnic cleansing, and Ethan responds by accusing him of using Jews as a token and again asks Hasan if he's polled Jews on this. "Show me all the Jews screaming from the river to the sea, I'd like to see a fucking video of it. Find me one video of a Jewish person screaming it". Hasan pulls up a tweet from Jewish Voice for Peace defending the phrase. Ethan then says "What do you actually know about this group?" but Hasan points out they're the largest network of Anti-Zionist Jews in America, so Ethan switches to saying "don't you see how fucked up it is to say this group of people say it's not offensive so you don't get to be offended", which Hasan points out he only did because Ethan specifically requested it. Ethan then says he said he wanted a video of a Jew screaming it and a tweet doesn't count because people brigade anything on Twitter and that people retweeting it probably aren't Jewish, which Hasan points out doesn't actually change the fact that a network of anti-Zionist Jews tweeted it in the first place, so then he says "show me a video not a tweet". Hasan offers to phone Noah Kulwin and Ethan says "I don't care what one person says", although Hasan points out he's asking to see a video of one Jew yelling the phrase. Ethan says this is like saying that if he could find one Palestinian that says occupation is justified then it's ok. Hasan counters by saying that the morality behind that statement is incorrect, whereas this argument is just about whether or not a phrase is anti-semetic.

Ethan starts saying he'll find a group of white people who say the Confederate flag isn't racist. Hasan actually pleads with him to stop, because "you're making a conflation that makes you look horrible, you're making yourself look bad, please stop", associating Palestinians calling for liberation with oppressors upholding oppressive values. He points out that there's a lot of white people who think "black lives matter" means "fuck all whites" but that doesn't change the morality behind the sentiment. Ethan insists "From the river" is offensive to Jews. Again, Hasan insists "as your friend" to stop repeating this sentiment, and Ethan flatly states that Jewish people feel the phrase is harmful to them because terrorist groups use it. Hasan says he's not going to alter his position and does "Free Palestine" mean kill Jews because Hamas say it as well? Ethan says it depends on context, which Hasan points out he was already saying. He points out there are Zionist Jews who would argue Free Palestine is calling for the death of Jews.

Hasan asks Ethan "When you want to understand what the slogan Black Lives Matter means, do you ask white people what it means or do you ask black people what it means?". He ends up asking this several times because this actually temporarily stunlocks Ethan who can't work out how to respond. Eventually Ethan starts saying that the phrase is different so it doesn't insinuate anything about white people. Hasan responds that the phrase isn't "From the river to the sea, we should kill all the Jews", so also doesn't insinuate anything. Ethan says he's just explaining how people feel; Hasan argues that if he were telling him what white people feel about BLM he'd say he doesn't care what they feel.

Ethan asks Hasan if he cares that his chat is calling him racist. Hasan says he hasn't been looking at chat. Ethan asks if Hasan has moderators and if he cares at all. Hasan says people are saying that because of the conflations he made that Hasan had specifically warned him not to do, including comparing Jewish Voice for Peace to the Kapos. Ethan says "you are so bad faith for saying that and fuck you for even putting that out in the world, my point was you can find anybody to defend any fucking thing, that was my point". Hasan then just re-explains the points he's been trying to get Ethan to understand for the past hour. Ethan starts reading hate comments out loud and asking "don't you moderate? How can you be surprised when your discord is full of fucking freaks?". Hasan says "I love you but there's only so much I can do if you're making that argument, you know that right? You're an adult and the words that you're saying are going to be perceived by people in a certain way. I can't constantly tell my community to shut the fuck up - which I have, because I know you personally and I know that your heart's in the right place, but they don't know". Ethan says he's just telling him his perspective and he doesn't know what the fuck Hasan wants from him, and that his chat is filled with psychotic monsters and that he needs to moderate. Hasan says there's 33,000 people in the Twitch chat and it's so fast it's impossible to moderate, but he'll put it in "email mode".

Hasan says there's only so much he can do about those comments when Ethan makes those comparisons, and Ethan says "I can make any comparison I fucking want, dude" and claims Hasan is putting words in his mouth. Hasan has to quickly walk out the room. Ethan continues complaining, noting someone had just called him a fat zionist freak pig, then addresses chat to say he understands the analysis that the phrase "From The River to The Sea" is not anti-Israel or anti-semetic, he's just explaining why most Jews find it offensive because they interpret as calling for the deaths of Jews, and so it's not good to keep using it. Hasan comes back at this point and Ethan continues saying that people can use that phrase but he just wanted to clarify how Jews feel, and it's not fair that people are so shocked Jews feel that way. Hasan suggests the better thing to do would be to educate Jews to understand that the phrase isn't calling for their deaths. Ethan asks if Hasan understands why that phrase might be scary to Jews, and Hasan agrees (which Ethan initially seems to take as a win) but he continues on to say that he also understands why Black Lives Matter might be a scary phrase for some white people and it doesn't matter. Ethan whines that Hasan won't make any concessions while he makes so many concessions to Hasan, and so "it's not fun to talk to you when it's like that". Hasan just explains he's trying to combat disinformation about the phrase through educating people on the meaning. Ethan stresses he's just trying to educate people on why Jews find the phrase scary and not understanding this is a barrier to constructive conversation. Hasan says again that he does understand it but he's trying to deliver a counterfactual. Ethan says "peace and progress happen when we have empathy and connect". He decides that "we just keep talking in circles" and he doesn't want to keep talking about it and his throat's sore. Hasan sighs and sarcastically says "I'm sorry we couldn't make peace on this one issue".
That was over an hour of "Jews find the phrase From the River to the Sea scary because they interpret it as calling for their death", "Ok but it's just a slogan for Palestinian liberation, it's not calling for their death" "but you need to understand Jews find it scary because they think it's calling for their death" "I understand Jews find it scary, but they shouldn't, because it's not calling for their deaths" "but Jews find it scary because they think it does call for their deaths" "but they shouldn't because it isn't calling for their genocide" "but you need to understand that they think it does"" "I do understand but they shouldn't" "but they do".

Hour Four:
Ethan says it's fucked up how people are going to interpret his comments now, in part based on Hasan's analysis. He's not a radical or religious Jew, he has no stake in the game (you're married to an Israeli, Ethan). Ethan then gets up and walks off. He's gone for long enough that Hasan removes his camera from the screen, but we hear Ethan come back in (03:00:01). Hasan asks him if he's ok and he Ethan says, crying, "Sorry, I don't know why I get so fucking emotional lately". Hasan says they don't have to continue if he doesn't want to or doesn't feel like it.

Hasan said this is why he wanted to feature Jewish and Israeli voices. Ethan comes back on screen and says he's not a sensitive Jew and never screams antisemitism about anything and he's just telling everyone how Jews see the phrase. Hasan said he's just explaining the Palestinian perspective and suggests Ethan should have this conversation with an Antizionist Jewish person. Ethan asks "why does it matter if they're Jewish" to which Hasan points out it's because he's not Jewish and Ethan keeps complaining that Hasan (a non-Jew) is telling a Jew how to feel. Ethan asks how one person is representative, and Hasan says just that an Antizionist Jew can talk about it from a united perspective and give more feedback.

Ethan reads out another chat comment - "OK, we don't give a fuck if they interpret it like that, because they're braindead genocidal freaks. It's like understanding a Nazi's perspective that emancipation for minorities is a threat to their existence. Get the fuck out of here.". Hasan says the person who wrote that wasn't talking about Jews, but about Zionists. Ethan asks how Hasan can expect the mods to keep the discourse civil when that comment was left by a moderator (although he refuses to say which mod). Hasan says his moderation team has been tackling antisemitism for 4-5 years at this point. Ethan complains another mod said "Ethan's so bad faith" and he doesn't understand what he's bad faith about. Hasan starts explaining that he's been yelling at his chat to not take extreme takes on Ethan, but Ethan asks him what he's bad faith about. Hasan asks if he wants the truth "no kid gloves" so Ethan starts swearing at him and complaining he's being spoken down to. Hasan says that what Ethan said about "from the river to the sea" being akin to a Nazi slogan - Ethan interjects and says he didn't say that, Hasan continues and says he knows Ethan and knows he's a good person, but to anyone else it's going to come across like he's making a bad faith argument that Ben Shapiro would make, and of course people say that, because people don't see his reconcilliation process; just the clips. Ethan says that's not bad faith, that's out of context. Hasan says it's not being taken out of context because the context is saying it in defence of bastardising the perspectives of Palestinians or minimising their voices, and that's a tactic to stop people using any type of emancipatory slogan.

Ethan says he isn't advocating for anyone to stop using that phrase, he just is saying what Jewish people think of the phrase. Hasan observes that Anti-Zionist Jews and Zionist Jews will have different thoughts and again Ethan says "So you're saying because one group says it's not offensive, I'm wrong?". Ethan says "at a certain point, genociding all the Jews there becomes anti-semitic" to which Hasan says "obviously genociding Jews is anti-semitic". Ethan says that's how people in Israel perceive the slogan. Hasan points out that Ethan openly acknowledges that Israelis are unjustifiably paranoid (back when they were talking about the one state solution, what feels like a lifetime ago). "You cannot set the boundaries on an emancipatory movement because of the unreasonable fears they have about that slogan". It's an optics cudgel to undermine the movement and in America people are getting arrested for saying the slogan.

Hasan says he doesn't want to fight and he's sorry he made Ethan feel a certain way, but people don't know how empathetic he is and they just hear arguments similar to those made by right wing reactionaries. Ethan says he's just trying to have an open and honest conversation. Hasan understands and wants to communicate that he isn't harbouring resentment or trying to get his community on him, he's doing the opposite - Ethan says "well I don't think your mods' goals align with yours". Hasan says he'll talk to them about it, but he understands why they reacted how they did. Ethan starts reading more comments - "You're showing you're Zionist, Ethan", "Shrug I don't care about your feelings, I'm not taking it back" (Ethan is now naming names) "Frogan said - I forget what she said but that I'm a Zionist or something like that". Hasan says that the talking points Ethan has demonstrated come across like he is in defence of Israel and are identical to the talking points of people who defend Israel. Ethan asks when he defended Israel. Hasan says he knows Ethan isn't defending Israel because he knows him personally but the talking points are identical to those arguments. Ethan asks for examples to which Hasan says "Where do I begin" and points to the River to the sea conversation and again Ethan starts fucking bitching about how he's a Jew and he's just trying to tell people how Jews feel about it. Hasan says even having the one state solution conversation shows Ethan isn't a Zionist, to which Ethan missing the point and starts insisting he's not a Zionist.

Ethan announces he has to go, and he thinks he'll deeply regret having had this conversation. Hasan addresses his audience - "As a final statement on this, Ethan's not a bad person, he's not a Zionist, he's delivering the perspective of someone who's lived in Israel. Yelling at Ethan is not appropriate or productive in this scenario." Ethan tells the audience they need to learn to build a bridge and bitches about the mods again, then just starts avowing that he hates Bibi and supports the Palestinian cause. Explaining what Jewish Israelis think isn't endorsing their viewpoints. He feels in parts of Hasan's community there's no tolerance or empathy or desire to hear from his perspective, and outright hatred for Jews. He thinks there'll never be a chance for peace if even people like him are being seen as Zionists. Hasan agrees, and says people are black and white on the internet because they build assumptions off of hearing similar talking points, which is why people accuse him of supporting Hamas. Ethan says Hasan's community is incredibly hostile to him and he feels unwelcomed. Hasan cautions Ethan that there'll be clips of this taken out of context, and used to criticise Israel but also to paint Hasan as hating Ethan. Ethan feels that any screenshot from his discord would be so sweet and supportive of Hasan even when they disagree, while Hasan's community is hateful. Hasan stresses that there's mentally ill people in his community who attack him for perceived slights all the time, because it's a polarised political community. Ethan complains that his mods have been rude, but he admires Hasan. Also that you can say "From the River to the Sea" and it's not inherently anti-semitic, and he doesn't think anti-Zionists are Kapos etc etc. Hasan begs Ethan not to read stuff written online shitting on Ethan after this stream
I think I've lost so many brain cells from watching that stream. Ethan doesn't seem to understand Hasan's points (and they're pretty basic points because it's Hasan). Hasan's absolutely a pie-in-the-sky idiot idealist but he actually ended up seeming pretty reasonable in comparison just because Ethan was so obtuse, and Ethan seems to be hiding his actual opinions on Israel/Palestine behind "I'm just saying what Israelis think". Also Ethan wasn't actually on camera when he started crying, so that was a complete waste of time to watch, although it was a little bit amusing to see Ethan shilling Teddy Fresh any moment Hasan left the room ("You've seen Hasan wear it, buy it now in our black Friday sale!").
 
Seeing it blow up on twitter too.
1711559355356.png

Love some of these replies.
1711559396471.png
1711559412416.png
1711559487358.png
 
People associate leftism with annoying douchebags who hate fun because they are. Leftists are some of the most humorless angry people you will meet online. You can't be nonstop screeching about imaginary Nazi's and be a chill fun person to be around. When your ideology forces you to police other people and scold them you are an insufferable annoying person to be around.
untitled-png.5853642
 
I genuinely think Hasan would be happier if he just went through with boxing Sam Hyde. It'd get rid of a lot of his annoying douche bags that hate fun, get a ton of attention from everyone and he could talk about boxing instead of retarded commie shit all the time. With all that exposure he could create a space to convert normies to his politics. Why it might just come to pass that he realizes that maybe people like Sam Hyde aren't actually Nazis who should be thrown into a gulag for disagreeing with him by simply participating in a sport.

Of course, Hasan is a bitch and must live the rest of his life bowing to mentally ill leftists, as he should.
 
I genuinely think Hasan would be happier if he just went through with boxing Sam Hyde. It'd get rid of a lot of his annoying douche bags that hate fun, get a ton of attention from everyone and he could talk about boxing instead of retarded commie shit all the time. With all that exposure he could create a space to convert normies to his politics. Why it might just come to pass that he realizes that maybe people like Sam Hyde aren't actually Nazis who should be thrown into a gulag for disagreeing with him by simply participating in a sport.

Of course, Hasan is a bitch and must live the rest of his life bowing to mentally ill leftists, as he should.
I will give Hasan credit on one thing. He did straight up admit that he couldn't beat Sam Hyde.
 
Back