Disaster Hayao Miyazaki, Who Said AI Is ‘Insult to Life Itself,” Reduced to AI-Generated Meme by OpenAI

404media - Archive
On Tuesday, OpenAI updated ChatGPT with new AI image generation capabilities that make it especially good at recreating specific visual styles. People trying the new feature immediately flooded social media with images in the style of Studio Ghibli and Japanese animation legend Hayao Miyazaki, who famously called artificial intelligence “an insult to life itself.”
Miyazaki’s quote comes from a 2016 documentary in which he’s shown a demo of a 3D model whose movements are animated with AI as opposed to manually, by a human, as is usually the case in 3D animated videos or video games.
“Thinking of him, I can’t watch this stuff and find [it] interesting,” Miyazaki says after seeing the demo, saying it reminds him of a friend with a disability. “Whoever creates this stuff has no idea what pain is whatsoever. I am utterly disgusted. If you really want to make creepy stuff, you can go ahead and do it. I would never wish to incorporate this technology into my work at all. I strongly feel that this is an insult to life itself.”
ChatGPT’s new AI image generation capabilities are not substantively different from what many other AI image generators can already do. There are many AI image generation models on Civitai, for example, that are trained on Studio Ghibli movies and are good at imitating them. This is one thing generative AI is inarguably good at: copying the work of human artists, be they visual artists, musicians, or writers.
ChatGPT’s Ghibli moment is notable, however, because it’s extremely viral—even OpenAI founder Sam Altman has changed his X profile picture to a Ghiblified version of himself—and because it shows how far OpenAI, the company that started the current generative AI boom, and one that artists and publishers are currently suing for infringing on their copyrighted work, is willing to go in terms stealing from artists and content guardrails on its AI tools.
“Our goal is to give users as much creative freedom as possible,” an OpenAI spokesperson told 404 Media in an email. “We continue to prevent generations in the style of individual living artists, but we do permit broader studio styles—which people have used to generate and share some truly delightful and inspired original fan creations. We’re always learning from real world use and feedback and we’ll keep refining our policies as we go.”
Some of these “truly delightful and inspired original fan creations” allow users to use studio Ghibli’s style to recreate the assassination of JFK, an infamous example of censorship of Stalin’s image in the Soviet Union, or the moment U.S. forces captured Sadam Hussain in Iraq.
Our testing showed ChatGPT would also generate famous and graphic war photographs in the style of Ghibli movies, including “napalm girl” and “Saigon Execution.”
Previously, OpenAI was known for having very aggressive guardrails that prevented people from generating images featuring any real people, even historical figures. For example, in 2023, we reported that its AI image generation tool DALL E prevented people from generating images of Julius Caesar. The viral Ghibli images show the company’s position on this has clearly changed.
OpenAI told us that it is not blocking the model’s capability to depict adult public figures, but that they “implement the same safeguards we employ for editing images of photorealistic uploads of people. This is to enable helpful and beneficial uses in areas like education, historical, and satirical speech.”
Despite the lawsuits, outrage, and general resistance from artists, generative AI is already working its way into the workflows of many creative fields, including anime. Animation, which requires meticulous drawing of thousands and thousands of frames is famously grueling work, and some anime studios are already incorporating generative AI into their process to help with that workload. This, however, is not the same thing is the wholesale lifting of someone else’s style, and a model’s ability to copy the look of Spirited Away does not at all indicate its ability to create a work of art of that caliber.
1743033860369.png

Thread for more examples of what this is talking about.
 
I don’t see how this is any different than all the Tumblrites who have been ripping off Miyazaki’s style for years. It’s all derivative slop. He’s not wrong about that.

But Miyazaki had to start from somewhere, and early in his career he appropriated other styles until he solidified his own. Perhaps we will see AI do that, but likely not. The difference between a human and AI is one knows what God is supposed to look like.
 
100 IQ user detected
I really want to know what people believe they're saying when they make hyperbolic statements like "artists/writers/whatever are going to be obsolete thanks to AI." If you're one of those people who believes AI is a tool that does things like produce in-between frames on animation, I'm not referring to you. That view makes sense to me. The jobs people have doing that soul-crushing work will (I hope) transition to supervising and fine-tuning AI labor.

But for anyone who has actually thought about this topic and has said something like "artists/writers/whatever are going to be obsolete thanks to AI" is probably not some normalfag. You probably do not consider yourself among the Jerry Springer, Honey Boo-Boo or Family Guy watchers of the world. When AI is put into gear and asked by corporations to produce entertainment instead of the people who have actually, historically produced any of that stuff, it's going to be aimed at the lowest common denominator I just described. We see it already. AI art is already being quickly identified (and dismissed) as low-effort slop.

Are you suddenly going to be among that audience? Have you decided you're going to lower yourself to the same standard of indians who are entranced by AI slop thumbnails, for AI generated video essays, recited by AI? This garbage you're aware is garbage and isn't even worth your time because it has absolutely nothing to say? Because I don't think these two separate worlds of "Everyone has become a cynical critic thanks to the internet" and "corporations had all the artists removed so that robots can produce all the movies, television, music, books and video games" are ever going to be compatible.

This thought of "artists/writers/whatever are going to be obsolete thanks to AI", already the result of a jaded and world-weary mindset, seems to only apply to the dumb masses that somehow does not include you. Somehow, everyone else is a cretin who will tolerate one branch of technology destroying all art.

And just because I don't think that 100 IQ post was long or demented enough: you've allowed these nepotist kikes to butt their way into entertainment, muscle everybody else out, produce absolute garbage and then (in your mind) make the decision of "Well we should replace art with AI since all the current day 'art' is shit anyway." You've been finessed into shitting on the graves of your ancestors, who were killed by these jews.
 
What use are "writers" and "artists" compared to AI when they produce the same uncreative slop? At least with ai I can fuck around with it and make something funny. I'm not gonna watch the new movie made by ai nor am I gonna watch a movie made by ''real creative artists tm'' when the result is the same uninspired garbage. Ai is a tool for the creative mind to mess around with. Fuck you and learn to weld faggot
 
ChatGPT can now do what Stable Diffusion users could do two years ago. Whooptie fucking do.

The real power of Ai is using it to express an ideas you couldn't normally do. It's just like photography. Anybody can spend 5K on the latest variant of the EOS. Anybody can drop 2K on the latest lenses and tripods, but it doesn't make you a photographer. In fact, it allows people to shitpost freely and those with the skill to actually unlock the power of what they have available should be able to come out on top.
But the reality of the situation is actually kinda dire to be honest. Hundreds of thousands of retards churning out same-face shit instead of setting up their own system and learning how to finely manipulate AI.. You know, just like photography.
00082.jpg

Getting words to work on a 1660 results in the most burned fucking images ever lmao.
 
What use are "writers" and "artists" compared to AI when they produce the same uncreative slop? At least with ai I can fuck around with it and make something funny. I'm not gonna watch the new movie made by ai nor am I gonna watch a movie made by ''real creative artists tm'' when the result is the same uninspired garbage. Ai is a tool for the creative mind to mess around with. Fuck you and learn to weld faggot
you've allowed these nepotist kikes to butt their way into entertainment, muscle everybody else out, produce absolute garbage and then (in your mind) make the decision of "Well we should replace art with AI since all the current day 'art' is shit anyway." You've been finessed into shitting on the graves of your ancestors, who were killed by these jews.
I'm reiterating my point because people actually come to the same conclusion you just did. The problem is not art or artists, the problem is who is subverting those two things.
 
I'm reiterating my point because people actually come to the same conclusion you just did. The problem is not art or artists, the problem is who is subverting those two things.
Unfortunately, when a lot of people think of "art" they think about prestige positions like "film director" or "magic card illustrator" or something like that, and they associate it with some loudmouths with gay opinions because of that. So it's kind of a losing battle trying to convince these people that everything they interact with will be shittified over time when all the nameless artists in the creative departments are dismissed and replaced with computer.
 
We see it already. AI art is already being quickly identified (and dismissed) as low-effort slop.
Every time I see someone online talking about stuff like this it reminds me of stuff like this:

1687203733960091.jpg

I think the discussion around AI art shit is getting muddled because both sides are going to the extremes.
Half the discussion is people thinking we're right on the cusp of having gen-AI that can completely phase out the creative populace. And you have the other half that are pearl-clutching in the hopes of keeping artists employed.

This shit's somewhere in the middle. No, gen-AI is not a complete replacement for artists, and probably won't be for another several decades, if ever. But it is neat and a fun tool, and will definitely alter how art is done. People are just enjoying playing around with this new technology, because it's fun and lets people create stuff they normally couldn't do.

The biggest concern is that corpos are going to be pitched that it is a complete replacement, and will end up spending millions of dollars building up useless infrastructure, while firing the people they actually need to do jobs. Same shit happens whenever something new comes out. When machine learning was starting to be a thing, I remember having to explain to the C-Suite of my company why we can't just replace all the analysts with a couple of ML "data scientists." Retarded executives being taught retarded things in their MBA courses ruin these new amazing things, because it has conditioned everyone to circle the wagons every time things that make a job easier for them come out.
 
Back