- Joined
- Aug 1, 2022
I think adding Andrealphus isn't really a problem in itself. He can work as being the next big major villain, especially if Stella was to be killed off or reformed. The main issue is that the writing itself doesn't do anything with Stella. She hates Stolas, always had hated Stolas, and will continue to hate Stolas. And that's it. She's not a character; just a prop to expand on Stolas. Though to be fair, that's not just solely a Stella issue. All the female characters in this show are mostly just props for the male characters' stories.It's been said on this thread before, but HB would be slightly more watchable if Andrealphus didn't exist and all of his qualities, motives and plans were given to Stella instead.
Viv did say that Stella would be getting her own backstory eventually, but it's probably going to be something like daddy issues, or how her parents didn't care that much for her and they focused all of their attention to her brother. Stella exists not because she's an actual character, but to make Stolas look like a much better person than he really is, and because she's a set up to make Andre be the actual big endgame villain of the show.
We don't even know how her relationship with her daughter really is. 2 seasons in and if i remember correctly she hasn't talked to Octavia directly on camera. The most we get is them hugging and then a grin from Stella, but it doesn't feel earned, we don't know if she feels any genuine emotions for Octavia or if she hates her existence for binding her to Stolas forever. Maybe if we had a scene with Stella telling Octavia how much her dead-beat father doesn't love her to show us how much of a vile being she is but no, we have to use our imagination to fill in the story gaps that maybe Stella interacts with her daughter and maybe they have some kind of emotional bond, but who the hell knows?
Viv said that Stella's backstory will be similar to Beatrice Horseman's story, but that's not going to work for someone like Stella. The screentime with Beatrice showed that there was more going on for her than just being "Bojack's abusive mother" so when we did get to her backstory episode, it expanded more on what we knew about her and why she is the way she is. Doing a backstory on Stella won't accomplish that; it's just going to feel like a different character to the one we got.
That didn't have to be the case either. In season 1, you had the start of something for Stella's character. She was bitter at Stolas for having an affair with an imp; hurt because she either actually loved him and/or it would ruin her status as an ars goetia. But nope. In the beginning of season 2, she point blank just says that she likes to torment Stolas. And that's it. No nuance.
You think that maybe when she brings up the ars goetia after Stolas says he's going to divorce her, that could bring along something. That her standing as an ars goetia could be jeopardized and that's why the two of them stayed together so long in this marriage. That it would be better for her to be a widow than a divorced wife. But the show doesn't do anything with that. It's not a big scandal as it was implied to be. Nobody cares, so why should I? There was no plan. Everything is written as it goes along.