Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts,

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
naha said:
2 + 2 = is not by chance nearly 4 for everyone and 3 or 5 for some people. but ( dull brain ) it is 4 for everyone.

special note : Intelligence has to do with the soul, not simply with the brain.

Take electricity, for example. Electricity moves between gross elements and through a gross wire. But the electricity itself -- it is not those elements, not that wire. It is subtle.
______________
and what is that fatal flaw ? that there is papa before your birth ? is that means you are dropped from the sky into the womb of your mum ? are you that intelligent bluff ? than you are foolish bluff. not intelligent but an fool you are than.

and if you will find out your real papa by this bogus DNA test than entire hands and legs transplant is the contradiction to your bluff.

if DNA does not match with anyone else other than relatives and parents than how doctors are transplanting entire hand or legs from someone else who is neither our relative nor parent ?

what is the damn answer to this argument killer contradiction ? how doctors are transplanting entire hand or leg ? this contradiction has already fatally killed your nonsense.
___________
and dont accept anything at all and remain the damn football. ;') and enjoy your kicks ( with repeated birth after birth ) from 1 nation to another.

kindly enjoy it. enjoy your kicks ( will full football )
Click to expand...
@Brad Watson_Miami Do you have any comments on this here numerological marvel?
 
naha said:
2 + 2 = is not by chance nearly 4 for everyone and 3 or 5 for some people. but ( dull brain ) it is 4 for everyone.

special note : Intelligence has to do with the soul, not simply with the brain.

Take electricity, for example. Electricity moves between gross elements and through a gross wire. But the electricity itself -- it is not those elements, not that wire. It is subtle.
______________
and what is that fatal flaw ? that there is papa before your birth ? is that means you are dropped from the sky into the womb of your mum ? are you that intelligent bluff ? than you are foolish bluff. not intelligent but an fool you are than.

and if you will find out your real papa by this bogus DNA test than entire hands and legs transplant is the contradiction to your bluff.

if DNA does not match with anyone else other than relatives and parents than how doctors are transplanting entire hand or legs from someone else who is neither our relative nor parent ?

what is the damn answer to this argument killer contradiction ? how doctors are transplanting entire hand or leg ? this contradiction has already fatally killed your nonsense.
___________
and dont accept anything at all and remain the damn football. ;') and enjoy your kicks ( with repeated birth after birth ) from 1 nation to another.

kindly enjoy it. enjoy your kicks ( will full football )
Click to expand...
Rebuttal #1:

You said:

"Intelligence has to do with the soul, not simply with the brain.

Take electricity, for example. Electricity moves between gross elements and through a gross wire. But the electricity itself -- it is not those elements, not that wire. It is subtle."

As evidence for the first statement, you make the analogy of Electricity traveling along wires and gross elements, but noting that the electricity is not the wire or elements. This is ultimately the fallacy of the weak analogy. This is fallacious because the comparison of electricity and the soul is simply not strong enough.

Here is a definition of electricity:

electricity
n
1. (Physics / General Physics) any phenomenon associated with stationary or moving electrons, ions, or other charged particles[1]

Notice, that electricity is a phenomenon, which denotes that one can observe and perceive it, unlike the soul. Also, note that it is associated with electrons, ions and charged particles all of which are MATERIAL, and the soul by definition is immaterial.[2] Therefore, these strong differences cause the analogy to not hold up once inspected closesly.

What is ironic is that our nervous systems have chemical and ELECTRICAL synapses that orcastrate the vast voluntary and involuntary functions of the body. Electrcity (and chemicals), is the mechanism that fuels us and allows our body to function from one central unit, the brain.[3]

Rebuttal #2

You said:

"all right for what you are waiting for ? why don't you define what is Conscious on the basics of your medical language or on scientific basics ? explain it now."

From a scientific perspective there is much that we don't understand about consciousness, though there are many competing theories out there, one of which being that consciousness is an illusion. That our unconscious brain activity gives rise to this fluid conscious state, that is interpreted through our sensory organs and brain to produce our conscious experience.

For instance, have you ever had a morning where you didn't get enough sleep? Your conscious experience of the world the next morning was probably altered a great deal, as you probably felt a bit groggy and not as on point as usual. Or perhaps have you ever been hit in the head before to the point where you become unconscious? Or lastly, have you ever looked into optical illusions? These visual spectacles illustrate how our brain reinterprets our sensory input in order to make sense of it, and reveals the somewhat illusory and subjective world in which we live.

I point these three out as they reveal the physical nature of consciousness. If our brains do not get enough rest, they don't function properly. If the brain is damaged, consciousness may be lost. And the phenomenon that we witness is in fact reinterpreted by the brain.

However, let's suppose that I didn't know anything at all, or that you somehow disproved all of my arguments. Would your explanation be any better? In fact, the soul as consciousness explanation is a non-explanation as it doesn't explain anything that we observe, it merely blindly asserts on the basis of faith without any evidence. Arguments without evidence, may be dismissed without evidence.

You said:

"and the first step is to know the difference between a living body and a dead body. What is the difference?"

Well, one can easily observe that a dead body no longer has the capacity to interact with it's surroundings or grow, reproduce. It only changes because of the decomposition process. If you go in a bit deeper you can see that cellular reproduction and all other biological processes have ceased in a dead body, versus the living body.

You said:

"and then next Question is Why a dead child born does not grow, does not change body? The body is a lump of matter. Analyze the body. Where is life?"

I'm not sure where you are going with these questions, but they have perfectly clear scientific answers. One of the facts of life is death, it is the permanent cessation of vital activity within a cell, tissue, organs and organism. Cellular death is a common, necessary and healthy activity as the opposite is cancer. When organs (which are made up of tissue) fail, it can result in death of the entire organism.

Now you asked the question, "Where is life?" If you're asking me from a biological perspective, then what I have said thus far applies, however you would be in error if that's merely what I saw in the world. For instance, I do not look at the woman I love as a lump of matter. Is it true that she is a lump of matter in some sense? Yes. This of course ignores the fact that the composition does not necessarily define the whole. To me she is a beatiful and loving woman who I feel an incredibly deep connection to.

Concluding statements:

The large majority of my rebuttals from the first section of my argument have gone completely unaddressed thus far.
 
This is like your second thread of this shit, get out, OP.

If you want to continue this autism, go check your PMs, @naha .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back