Culture Hitler is trending on TikTok again — and they’re trying to make him seem like a nice guy

Link (Archive)

Hitler is trending on TikTok again — and they’re trying to make him seem like a nice guy​

Hitler is, once again, trending on TikTok. Speeches given by the Nazi Führer, translated into English and read by an AI in a stilted accent, have garnered millions of views on the platform.

Some users lip-synched to the speeches, others simply posted them with a darkened image of Hitler in military attire; most implied or openly stated praise for the speeches and for the Nazi leader.

Media Matters, a think tank that tracks hate speech online, reported that some of the sounds and videos have since been removed, after receiving hundreds of thousands or even over a million views each, but some accounts are still active and regularly uploading content.

The virality of the videos is another instance of TikTok’s struggles to moderate posts on its platform. Though its policies prohibit praising or sharing the manifestos of “individuals who cause serial or mass violence, or promote hateful ideologies,” users are often able to find ways around the rules or fly under the radar.

On TikTok, trending videos are grouped around “sounds,” snippets of audio that users can use as a backdrop for their own videos; sounds are relatively harder to moderate, given that the speaker is often hard to identify and the content doesn’t include openly prohibited terms such as slurs. The use of AI to read Hitler’s speeches in English allowed the speeches to be produced quickly and reposted in a slightly different version if they’re removed, avoiding TikTok’s regulations. From there, numerous videos can spread the speech by using it as a background sound for their posted videos.

The videos also rarely identify Hitler by name, often using euphemisms such as “the great painter” or “the Austrian painter” — a reference to his stalled art career — instead. And the content of the speeches used in the videos is not overtly hateful; the excerpts feature Hitler saying he did not want to go to war but was forced to, as well as discussing art and culture.

This tactic of using anodyne excerpts from Hitler’s speeches serves not only to evade moderation, however, but also to frame the Nazi as a maligned hero and an great leader. Some feature such captions as “what if he won” and “just listen.”

And while some comments express skepticism that Hitler was a good leader, many applaud the speeches, saying: “he is NOT the villain,” “AH was a good and kind man,” and “now I understand why they didn’t translate this before.”

This is not the first time something like this has occurred on TikTok; last autumn, Osama Bin Laden’s antisemitic “Letter to America” also went viral on the platform. Numerous users shared it, commenting their agreement with the inflammatory letter, which contains antisemitic conspiracies in addition to criticism of the United States.

The existence of this content on the platform is obviously dangerous and breaks TikTok’s own moderation rules. But it also serves as a gateway to more overt conspiratorial content; TikTok’s algorithm is skilled at directing people to more of what they seem interested in by suggesting similar search topics, and those automated suggestions are seemingly not subject to moderation in the way the videos are.

When Media Matters looked into the videos, they found suggested search terms popping up on videos, including “the painter English speech.” This shows that the algorithm is using the same coded language — referring to Hitler as “the painter” — to help direct users to more of Hitler’s translated speeches.

Not all of the videos made with the Hitler sounds, however, were supportive. Some used the sound of Hitler’s speech to mock the Führer, captioning them with jokes such as “when I pooped in the urinal in 3rd grade.”

Until TikTok improves its moderation, poop jokes may be the best defense against users attempting to popularize Hitler’s ideology again.
 
It was, shall we say, a mistake to try and make "Holocaust Survivor" an inherited title.

In tandem with making Hitler not a historical figure with actual objective traits and personal history, but this amorphous blob of every vice and every bad idea humanity ever came up with that just popped into existence?

It makes rational discussion impossible.

Used to be you laughed at Hitler for his stupidity, nowadays? Laughing at a Hitler joke shows you "approve" of him, somehow.....
 
The populace's inability to imagine Hitler as a complex being is why we're going to get another glad-handy populist re-doing his worst crimes.
He wasn't a cartoon villain. He was a person. That honestly makes what he accomplished all the more horrifying.
 
Present day history obviously doesn't marry up perfectly but if I had to assign roles:

Putin took an empire in decline and stabilized by being a strongman uni-party ruler. Putin made himself an enemy of Western banking and went back to the gold standard. Danzig was formerly part of German territory, the Ukraine was formerly part of Russian territory...Russia is mostly landlocked, Germany is mostly landlocked... Do you see where I'm going with this? Just like Churchill we have some agreement with some country deep in Eastern Europe, just like the UK we are flat broke, just like the UK we are the hegemon of the seas, just like the UK we stand to gain nothing in this war.... The late comers haven't really emerged yet, nor can we be sure they will.

Putin = Hitler
Zelensky = Raczkiewicz
Biden = Churchill (with a -10 to CHA... well to pretty much all stats really)
??? = Mussolini
??? = FDR
Mussolini: the Ayatollah

FDR: Chairman Xi (since China now has the industrial capacity that won America WW2)
 
Its the same speech? Also, thanks.

Unfortunately not. I went looking for the speech earlier because it came up in conversation. Should have known that YouTube wouldn't let it last.

The speech in the video was Freedom or Slavery, which I believe is one he gave to workers, firemen, civilians etc. prior to the war breaking out. If you really have to see it, there are archives of the collective 15 speeches that were AI translated on InternetArchive, but I'm not too keen on downloading 8 gig of Hitler speeches. Primarily because I don't want my name bumped up on any lists or to have any glowing vans outside my window.
 
In tandem with making Hitler not a historical figure with actual objective traits and personal history, but this amorphous blob of every vice and every bad idea humanity ever came up with that just popped into existence?

It makes rational discussion impossible.
yes hilter became chancler is 1933 in fucking 8 years it will be 100 years from that. Also the world and enviroment that created hilter namely WW1 and its fallout are a fucking 100 years ago.

what ever hilter was, its been go for a long time, and the constant screaming of him and nazi s is weird
 
Actually the better question is, where would Hitler have stopped? Would he have been satisfied with Danzig, with Poland or would he have pushed until he got a war with the French.

I am not exactly an expert World War II historian, but didn't Nazi Germany occupy France during the war? Sounds like he got his war with the French.
 
I am not exactly an expert World War II historian, but didn't Nazi Germany occupy France during the war? Sounds like he got his war with the French.

No I mean had The UK/France allowed the seizure of Danzig and been like "Yeah we can't control Germany anymore and the East is out of our sphere of influence at this point". Would Hitler have continued, how far would he have continued, which direction would he go? Because I think that was the call he expected them to make. Hitler actually writes kind of fondly of the British and I don't think he expected them to come to Poland's aid. Though on the flip side he absolutely hated the French and I would not be surprised if he had plans for them.

Essentially the question is "Was Hitler out to unify the continent under his rule before the flop or did he go all in on the turn card?"
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toji Suzuhara
Back