That's closer to what inspired fascism, national syndicalism, with a horizontal organization of the nation's classes working together for the good of everyone. No need for a Duce or a Fuhrer.
Yeah I remember. Basically an anarchist who makes a right wing form of socialism.
Not sure what the historical trend of anarchists creating heterodox movements.
I already made a check list of what shape this movement will become. Hold on:
Ok repeat failures from occupy wall street to now will result in a reactionary movement that is:
Very secretive. When a new movement against the establishment becomes very well know it gets hijacked quickly.
From attention seekers, arsonists, agents from other movements, corporations and government. To media purposely mis representing what the movement is. Every time it goes public it get ruined.
It will find to motivate people beyond identity and idealogy. So it could very well be paying people to get them to join. This why the cartels are so powerful. They have the dosh. Money transcends race, gender, and what have you. I'm going assume crime.
The third trait is it will find a way to defy attempts to classify it. It will seek to destroy established dictomonies and identities and replace them with something else. China did this. Ccp didn't care if someone was left or right. They only cares who can be bought and controlled. They took the established dictomony and replaced it with a new one.
It will achieve it's goals via corruption and bribery. 9/11 was an attempt to crash the american economy via destroying the twin towns. A center of finance. The master mind behind this in return was hunted down by the us military over the next decade. The 2008 recession was due to fraud an implosion of the world economy. I know a few people who committed suicide. The result? Bailouts. So if someone wants to win they're going focus on using corruption to bring down opposition. So once again crime
A balance between centralized leadership and leaderless movements. Occupy wall street was without a leader and got hijacked by all sorts of malcontents. Without leaders a movement doesn't have staying power. Yet in american history every effective leader who caused reformed got snapped in some way or form.
Sessionist.
It won't seek to reclaim america. It will seek to fragment america or try to break away from america. Also look at successful automonous zones, no go zones and enclaves. Places that are forsaken (such as detroit) or extremely remote. That where the next hitler will come from
It will an anti universalism.
It will give one set rules for followers and allow open game on outsiders. So tribalistic? Might be full ubi and stuff for members and nothing for outsiders. Full viking mode. Rape outsiders women but death penalty for those who harm fellow members.
Anti capitalism and anti leftism.
So yeah. Whatever matches those traits will probably be where our next hitler will come from.
Two more possible traits.
The movement will be anti tech. Silicon valley is the headquarters of woke. To be able to fight back will mean any reactionary will want to make society more technologally primitive.
nihilism or dooms day cult.
When I signed up many people scolded me for my views. Only to see in real time over a year to see farmers say shit like "I don't care any more. I want it all to burn" become more common. It's not just on the farms either.
The very worst it will be full blown trying to cause human extinction, or armageddon via nuclear war (or other means). The moderate types of nihilism will be scorched earth, vandalism, sabotage or suicide attacks. The very least crime and full on non compliance.
So the new right might have a self destructive or doomer bend
The final trait to look for is when you see a right wing movement be able to gain the obedience and loyalty of the traditionally rejected. Hitler had his brownshirts. It was filled with gays, criminals and other society society historically considers taboo.
Tell me where I'm wrong, right or so so
Or did I just write a bunch of word vomit?
