Homosexuality is evil.

[SwanSwanson]

"it's a victimless crime"

You literally get all sorts of horrible diseases from committing it.

"Two consenting adults! and they can use a condom"

You can literally use that excuse for all sorts of disgusting actions such as incest and scat fetishism, yet society at large doesn't accept those actions and considers them degenerate and deviant for insulting what we know as normal healthy sexual relations. If society at large can't accept something into it, then that's a sign something is bad.

And you do realize that with the acceptance of homosexuality, other worse things came along, and that's them bringing it to schools and having drag queens shake their asses in front of actual children. The acceptance of homosexuality has led to the acceptance of pedophilia. By being a homosexual, you have literally just declared that you do not care about having any future, any lineage any long-term health, or success because you just want to be a disgusting wretched hedonist in the present moment.

 

[The Magnificence]

...if you really want it up the ass that bad, you just have to say so. No need for all this masquerade.

 

[SwanSwanson]

...if you really want it up the ass that bad, you just have to say so. No need for all this masquerade.

Very funny

 

[BirdUp]

it's gay to fuck women because they like penis

 

[I'm Retarded?]

there are arguments to make about its harm to society generally but moralizing invites a whole universe of annoyingly hairy dilemmas like how to define evil, whose point of view it's being judged from, etc.

generally speaking it's not homosexuality specifically that's the issue, but the underlying attitudes. homosexuality is a problem due to its frequent association with risk-seeking behavior, hypersexuality, pedophilia, and so on, as well as the disingenuous evangelization dispensed on its behalf. if gays really were just a handful of deviants that formed committed monogamous relationships and stayed happily in their corner without trying to pretend like they're a healthy couple and trying to adopt kids or whatever (barring possible exceptions in extremis depending on the couple) it wouldn't be nearly as big of a deal. still problematic, to be sure, but not a dire social peril.

due to these underlying issues, burning out homosexuality doesn't solve the real destructiveness at the heart of it. it will just mutate, as we're seeing now that homosexuality is no longer considered deviant or taboo by most people. more than just an arbitrary decrying, what we need is a better cultural formulation of morality and/or philosophy that doesn't value anti-social individuality and hedonism so highly.

 

[Stan]

paging @m1ddl3m4rch to weigh in on how it is believing oneself to be an abomination before God

 

[I (Don't) Have A Gun]

You literally get all sorts of horrible diseases from committing it.

Yes but I always believed people should live with the consequences of their actions. I see this as simply being the case here. If some gays want to get aids then let them get aids. So long as they leave kids and the family dog out of it then I don't really care.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

paging @m1ddl3m4rch to weigh in on how it is believing oneself to be an abomination before God

You trampled the verses I quoted you before. I think I've cast enough pearls before you, swine.

 

[Margo Martindale]

dude bussy lmao

 

[whothefuck]

the whole "two consenting adults" and "in private" argument has been so tired out by now. Gays are just as bad as troons, they're only trying to make themselves seem virtuious in comparison- see all the "conservative" gays they're bringing out on Fox. Even starting to do "conservative" troons now like Bruce Jenner

 

[The Littlest Shitlord]

Homosexual desires stem from demonic temptation. If you give in to them, you can get an iniquity of perversion, allowing a demon to inhabit your body and tempt you even more. Because "perversion" is a broad category, becoming a homosexual opens you up to more and even worse demonic sexual temptations. Once you give in to them enough, they get enough influence over your mind that they can start to read your thoughts and respond, as well as control your physiological arousal. In this way, they can brainwash you into thinking that you really do deep down want to do the things that they are tempting you with. They can also do other things like give you sex dreams. But it really is all fake. Once they are embedded to that extent, it's hard to get rid of them, but it can be done.

But you really don't want to encourage people to embrace demonic sexualities like homosexuality, because they will gradually become possessed as their demon gets more and more control over them, and it will cause them to do other evil things as well. Society shouldn't tolerate it, but it is a curable spiritual sickness. Love the sinner and hate the sin.

 

[AnsemSoD1]

Your based and I will have sex with you.

 

[Slur Generator]

generally speaking it's not homosexuality specifically that's the issue, but the underlying attitudes. homosexuality is a problem due to its frequent association with risk-seeking behavior, hypersexuality, pedophilia, and so on, as well as the disingenuous evangelization dispensed on its behalf.

This is how fags have behaved since the dawn of time. When men abandon all shame and without women acting like a brake the male libido goes haywire and you get a doom spiral of degeneracy

if gays really were just a handful of deviants that formed committed monogamous relationships and stayed happily in their corner without trying to pretend like they're a healthy couple and trying to adopt kids or whatever (barring possible exceptions in extremis depending on the couple) it wouldn't be nearly as big of a deal. still problematic, to be sure, but not a dire social peril.

Whats the point of these IF's, they are not true. Fags are disproportionately pedophiles, they are not monogamous, average fag fucks more dudes in a year than the average non fag in a lifetime, all without condoms. Piss drinking, shit eating, zoo, you fucking name it. Fagotry is the centerpiece.

 

[Vampirella]

Don't we already have a gay debate thread?

 

[Stan]

You trampled the verses I quoted you before. I think I've cast enough pearls before you, swine.

lmao which ones? Leviticus, perhaps?

Anyway it sucks to be you, to believe that God hates you, that God made you in such a way that you would be an abomination but the Noahide peoples aren't even if they do the same thing, and that no matter how hard you try to become straight, God won't let you because he set you up for a life of suffering. It would almost explain why you're such a sad angry faggot.

I hope things can get better for you. That you join a more tolerant shul, that you come out to your family, that you realize you can have the life you want (i.e. a life as mine.) I hope you feel God's love instead of the shame and self-hatred that bedevil you now. But until then, the person chiefly responsible for your own misery is you.

Anyway, generally: It's OK to be gay. I don't think it's a choice, at least for some people. I don't think one needs to be closeted or celibate to deserve their civil rights as well as a right to be treated with civility. I know that living in shame doesn't actually help, it can only hurt. The Democratic party uses LGBT issues to make themselves look a lot more left-leaning than they are, because it allows them to avoid any discussion of class struggle. I wish they'd stop doing that, but I'm a Christian Socialist, and the Dems are run by capitalists.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

Usually the ones with the biggest hard on against gays are deep in the closet (true for a lot of issues, but gays in particular are meme level).

 

[SofondaCox]

I'd sooner say it is 'evil' to sexualize children and create more homosexuality than there is naturally.

 

[gang weeder]

there are arguments to make about its harm to society generally but moralizing invites a whole universe of annoyingly hairy dilemmas like how to define evil, whose point of view it's being judged from, etc.

Oy vey, the "hairy dilemma of how to define evil?" Well bro is murder evil? What about child rape? How can we know?!?!?!! Cuase like, defining evil is totally such a hairy dilemma n sheet, mayne. Maybe nothing is evil and it's all relative???

generally speaking it's not homosexuality specifically that's the issue, but the underlying attitudes. homosexuality is a problem due to its frequent association with risk-seeking behavior, hypersexuality, pedophilia, and so on, as well as the disingenuous evangelization dispensed on its behalf. if gays really were just a handful of deviants that formed committed monogamous relationships and stayed happily in their corner without trying to pretend like they're a healthy couple and trying to adopt kids or whatever (barring possible exceptions in extremis depending on the couple) it wouldn't be nearly as big of a deal. still problematic, to be sure, but not a dire social peril.

I mean yeah if you take any bad thing and say "but what if it wasn't bad?" then by definition it's not bad anymore. If blacks had an average IQ of 110 inner cities would still be decent places to live for example. Not really saying much of anything here.

 

[Mothra1988]

"it's a victimless crime"

You literally get all sorts of horrible diseases from committing it.

Did you just admit to having gay sex and getting an STD from it? LOL.

 

[Alt Owl]

In terms of evolution and species survival.