/horror/ general megathread - Let's talk about movies and shit.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Watched some new shit recently, emphasis on 'shit'.
Abigail - Felt like two franchise movies combined into one. The first half is the original movie that kicks off the franchise that people actually like, being an interesting movie about a kidnapped girl turning out to be a vampire that then massacres her kidnappers. But then you have the second half of the film, which feels like a later franchise sequel where they've clearly ran out of ideas, so the plot is that there's an even eviler vampire and now Abigail and the protagonist have to team up to killer the eviler vampire. Overall it's entertaining at least. The girl that plays Abagail is decent and clearly having fun with the role, and Dan Stevens is always good. Reminded me of Malignant with its constant genre and tone shifting.

In a Violent Nature - First and only film I've watched at 2x speed. The killer was good, a nice throwback to your basic '80s slasher, and the yoga kill was almost good enough to make up for the rest of the kills being generic and bland. What kills the movie, though, is the pacing. I like the idea of a methodical, deliberately paced slasher film... but this movie fails at it. There's a thin line between a deliberate, methodical pace and a slow, boring, ponderous pace, and this film smashes through that line and clambers far into the latter. When you have like a 10 minute scene of your killer slowly walking all the way around a lake to retrieve something he left on the other side of the lake, then it's time to rethink the way you're making your movie. Also, the script largely sucked and the practical effects were awful. Every decapitated head looked like something an 8 year old made with cheap plaster in arts & crafts class; I've seen people defend this as a deliberate homage to older slasher films but any old half-decent slasher had better practical effects than this.

Trap - The basic concept is great -- a serial killer trapped in a concert and trying to escape could've made for a good cat & mouse Hitchcockian thriller. Unfortunately, M. Night Shulamalum largely turns the film into a commercial for his daughter's music career. His daughter also can't act for shit, ruining the film even further. Josh Hartnett is at least pretty good as the psychopath hiding in plain sight. I didn't hate it but also not something I'd recommend.
 
Last edited:
There's very few found footage pictures worth a god damn but I always recommend Zero Day which is a school shooter movie shot from the perspective of the killers.
I saw it per your recommendation, and I liked it for the fact that it feels very real, especially if you've seen actual videos filmed by shooters like Randy Stair and the Columbine kids for example.

May sound dramatic, but that scene showing one of the killer's 5th birthdays felt eerie because it reminds you that these guys grew up to be actual terrible people.

The switch to the security camera footage with the 911 call is pretty fucked up too because the prior scenes reminded you that these were human beings who did this of their own volition, and knew fully well what they were going to do.
 
Speaking of which, there's Progeny (1998) by Brian Yuzna which might just be the first live-action depiction of tentacle rape.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=9VRdc4ciq74
An historic L for the nation of Japan, should that be the case.

As it happens, I just happened to watch an older movie where a tentacle monster attacks a naked woman: Battle for the Lost Planet (1986). The attack is surprisingly pretty PG-rated. Sadly nowadays it's assumed that any tentacle monster must have some lecherous design in mind, but 1986 was a more innocent time. I think it was just going to kill her.

It's otherwise a pretty cool movie: essentially post-apocalyptic scifi-comedy-horror Star Wars with no money but lots of models and stop-motion monsters. Stars Matt Mitler (formerly Hatt) from The Mutilator. I liked it enough watch the sequel Mutant Planet. I like these sorts of play-dough creatures.

mwar.png
 
Speaking of which, there's Progeny (1998) by Brian Yuzna which might just be the first live-action depiction of tentacle rape.
I'm not particularly well versed in the "live action tentacle rape" genre, but Japan released live action adaptions of the Angel of Darkness and La Blue Girl tentacle rape anime series, the first entries of each adaption being released direct-to-video in 1995. I wouldn't be surprised if there are even earlier examples, though.
 
Just saw all 4 of the Wishmaster movies, had only seen the first 2 before.

I can say that the last 2 aren't that bad. You wouldn't miss anything if you skipped them but I've seen far worse sequels. I'd like to think the first two movies are about the djinn played by Andrew Divoff and then the last two are about a different djinn. Andrew Divoff is still the best djinn in the series. I love him. He plays an inhuman creature so well. Favorite kill is when he turns Kane Hodder to glass. I love it.

But yeah, all 4 movies aren't that bad. If happen to catch the last 2 playing or something it's worth a watch just for the fun of it.
 
I have to give some credit to the proto-tentacle rapes from Alien (Lambert) and Evil Dead (the trees), even though it was a tail and a tree root respectively.
Possession (1981) beat even Urotsukidoji I think, but it's entirely consensual. Leave it to Japan to turn human/tentacle monster relationships into something sick and perverted.
 
Possession (1981) beat even Urotsukidoji I think, but it's entirely consensual. Leave it to Japan to turn human/tentacle monster relationships into something sick and perverted.
Hokusai did consensual tentacle sex first back in 1814 with his infamous The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife piece.
The_Dream_of_the_Fisherman's_Wife,_British_Museum,_version_1_(cropped).jpg
 
Last edited:
Hokusai did consensual tentacle sex first back in 1814 with his infamous The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife piece.
Consensual for the woman, maybe, but what about the octopus? The double standard is really saddening: we recognize bestiality as animal abuse when a mammal is involved, but when it's a cephalopod, ooh they're "monsters", it's "tentacle rape".
 
Consensual for the woman, maybe, but what about the octopus? The double standard is really saddening: we recognize bestiality as animal abuse when a mammal is involved, but when it's a cephalopod, ooh they're "monsters", it's "tentacle rape".
Rest assured that if Cthulhu is horny we'll toss your ass at his feet as a sacrifice.
 
Every decapitated head looked like something an 8 year old made with cheap plaster in arts & crafts class; I've seen people defend this as a deliberate homage to older slasher films but any old half-decent slasher had better practical effects than this.
This is one of my biggest pet peeves about modern horror movies, when they purposely make CGI or practical effects look like shit "in homage to classic movies". I seriously doubt the filmmakers of these movies are on a budget of a classic Corman movie and there have been so many advancements in what can be done with modern practical effects. Just make it look as good as you can.
 
Back
Top Bottom