First off, I love how everyone is just totally okay with giving their kids totally unfiltered access to the internet pretty much from fucking birth. That's it's own fucking problem, though.
I'm fine with middle schoolers learning about anal. Might prevent some unwanted pregnancies that way. Dildos, whatever. But its incredibly bold of you to assume I'm a fucking pedophile because I want young people properly educated on shit the internet will expose them to anyway. If the parent wants to sperg out because they don't want to face the fact that little Timmy and Sally know more about the reproductive system than they do its their choice. They can homeschool them or lock hands with Muslim fundamentalists in throwing a hissyfit.
Ah, yes, because we should teach kids that it's perfectly cool to shove things in your ass. Obviously their are no consquences. It's not talked about that often, but there are tons of gay men who are incontinent (MEANING THEY SHIT THEMSELVES) later in life.
This education=propaganda mindset is exactly why America is plagued with people who unironically use the word degenerate in normal conversation like it means something. Teaching about something doesn't equal endorsement. For instance teaching the fact that pederasty existed in Greek times doesn't mean you're promoting boy-fucking. This line of logic is precisely why so many young conservatives actually think "muh degeneracy" is a product of some modern jewish conspiracy and not a long-running, ancient part of humanity. When people are ignorant of history they become useful pawns and are unable to make decisions for themselves. The only cure is education.
Checks out as a comment made by someone who wants to hug very tightly to the state's nutsack and be fed their cum every night. "Please teach my children how to think and feel about social and political issues. I don't want that responsibility. Please Mommy government, you'd never hurt us or lead us astray!"
Well when they are teaching it under the section of "LGBT" in history under the same umbrella as the first gay kiss on film and shit. It doesn't exactly sound like they are condemning like they should. Especially when the whole fucking program is to teach you that you better accept all manners of sexual depravity and not have a goddamn thing to say about it.
So yes, sometimes propaganda IS wrapped up as 'education'
I ain't pushing shit, just voicing my opinion. I apologize that this wasn't the echo-chamber you wanted. I am a pretty huge faggot tho, so good eye?
Well, sure, maybe YOU aren't going out and telling kids how to feel about gay people, but plenty of faggots are.
Now we're going after sex ed? For fuck's sake....
I admit that teaching about anal sex and dildos are a bad idea at the elementary/middle school levels but why complain about teaching about normal sex, reproduction, and masturbation?
I've got no problem with that since it can help prevent the spread of STD's and underage pregnancies.
Let's face it, most kids are curious to know where babies come from and most people start masturbating around the later middle school years.
We also live in an age where internet porn is all too easily accessible and I'd rather have a licensed and vetted professional teach my kids about sex than videos on Pornhub.
As for stuff like anal sex or oral sex?
Eh, I can maybe accept teaching that in high school sex ed since teenagers are horny and we live in an age of digital degeneracy.
I mean, blowjobs and anal sex aren't exactly vanilla but I wouldn't really call them full-blown degenerate fetishes either, and again, it can be used as a countermeasure against the very real issue of teen pregnancy since several jurisdictions don't sell condoms to anyone under 18 (and truck stop vending machine condoms are notoriously unreliable compared to the stuff you buy off the shelf at a pharmacy)
I don't see why they teach dildo nonsense since you can't buy those if you're underage and that actually is kind of skeevy and degenerate.
Whether we like it or not, there will always be teenagers going out and fucking. It's inevitable, and we might as well mitigate the risk factors and teach safe sex to prevent the spread of diseases and teen pregnancy.
Abstinence-only sex ed has proven to be an utter failure, especially in the age of internet porn and I'd wager that a lot of the weird sexual hangups common among Millennials (especially SJW's) is due to being the first generation to have easy access to hardcore internet porn while simultaneously being the last generation to have abstinence-only sex ed be a common occurrence.
I do believe parents should be the main ones teaching their kids about sex, but let's face it, if the parents won't teach their kids about sex, someone else will and I'd rather it be the schools than the internet.
I'm not against sex-ed as a whole, but I think it should be taught reasonably. It almost seems like you don't disagree too much, but are maybe misunderstanding what I was getting at.
I just think sex-ed should be about teaching the very basics: always wear a condom, don't masturbate too much or your dick won't work right, and lubrication helps. Abstinence only is bullshit, obviously, what living creature isn't going to have the urge to reproduce.
I also think that public school sex-ed should be entirely optional. As in, you have to opt your kid INTO it, as opposed to have to opt them out. The norm should be parents teaching their own children about sex. Also, maybe have people who come around to different public schools, instead of having some shitcunt gym teacher come in and pretend to be a professional on the subject for the week, like most of these places do.
What I REALLY don't like is kids being taught about gay sex, and how it's just as normal and good as actual people sex.
Where are you getting this shit? Like where is this happening?
