How Do I Define My Gender if No One Is Watching Me? - Devoid of anyone to signal my gender to ... I felt, suddenly, amorphous and undefined


When the world went into lockdown five months after I started taking testosterone, I thought it would be easier not to see people for a while. Maybe they wouldn’t hear my voice go scratchy or see up close the hormonal acne splattered across my face. Alone in my apartment, I imagined that all my difficulties in being seen and recognized as transgender-nonbinary would evaporate. No one would gender me except myself; my pronouns would be right there in the text box on my Zoom screen.

So I was surprised by how much my gender instead seemed to almost evaporate. No longer on the alert for how to signal a restaurant’s waitstaff that neither “he” nor “she” applied to me, or for whether colleagues and neighbors would use the right language — devoid of anyone to signal my gender to — I felt, suddenly, amorphous and undefined. It was as though when I had swapped my Oxford shoes and neckties for fuzzy slippers and soft sweatpants, I, too, had lost my sharply tailored definition.

After I podded with two trans friends, the only people I saw from closer than six feet were also nonbinary, neither men nor women. Among us, not only the once ubiquitous binary, but also any gender expectations, had vanished.

Where did my own gender reside, then, if not in sending signals of difference? My friends and I had long joked, “Gender is a social construct!” every time one of us needed shoring up after a messy encounter with the expectations of the gender-conforming heterosexual world. But without that world, we now added a rueful punchline: “Too bad there’s no more ‘social’!”

I would have imagined this new expansiveness would be freeing. Instead, it was at first disorienting. With the gender binary all but gone, what did it mean to be nonbinary? How do I define my gender when I — accustomed to how visible my gender usually makes me — am no longer being watched?

Wanting to understand how others were adjusting to the pandemic change, I reached out to Rebecca Minor, a licensed clinical social worker who works with trans youth. “What’s really struck me,” she told me, “is that removing the peer gaze has allowed for more gender experimentation.”
Ms. Minor is in private practice and estimates that 85 percent of her clients are transgender. She works with teenagers, who are at an age when they spend endless hours watching and being watched. Thanks to Zoom school, she told me, “the peer gaze isn’t entirely gone” — but now it can be controlled. “It removes that feeling that someone sitting in the row behind me might be snickering or looking at what I’m wearing,” she said. It removes, in other words, the policing of gender.

To be sure, Ms. Minor’s clients, who are predominantly white, have resources that have protected them in the pandemic. They have supportive families, health care and economic stability. I, too, am white and thus privileged. Like them, I live in the liberal Northeast. For them, as for me, the time at home has been something of a reprieve.

Ms. Minor told me about the change in one client, a young, white, trans girl who had been struggling in school both socially and academically before the pandemic. “What we’re seeing is someone who finally isn’t having all of their space in their head taken up by worrying about their safety, worrying about other people’s perceptions of them,” Ms. Minor said. In her place was now a star student who had been missing.

A similarly liberating shift happened for Tygra Slarii, a 29-year-old Black performer at a Minneapolis bar, The Saloon. Before the pandemic, Mx. Slarii came out as a woman and had gender-affirming breast augmentation. “That’s what it seemed like everyone was pushing for me to do,” Mx. Slarii said, because people kept asking: “So when are you going to have the surgery? When are you going to get your boobs?”

When Minnesota issued shelter-in-place orders, the extended pause gave Mx. Slarii time to question, and explore the complexity of, gender — and come out again, this time as nonbinary. “My body isn’t a tool for marketing my transition anymore,” Mx. Slarii told me. “I don’t think cis people understand how much their input weighs down on trans people, especially when it comes to transitioning.”

When, during the pandemic, Mx. Slarii pursued a second gender-affirming surgery, a Brazilian butt lift, it was an entirely different emotional experience. This time, the surgery was no longer a means of selling a narrative to be believed and seen; now Mx. Slarii’s body was simply their own.
That said, in recent months, trans youth have been under terrifying legislative attack. And as a group, trans people have been hit hard by the pandemic. In January, researchers at Columbia found that many lost access to gender-affirming health care. The pandemic has exacerbated social inequality and injustice across the board; 16.8 percent of trans respondents reported job loss. It is a population already economically and socially marginalized.

Each time another devastating statistic about trans pain emerges, I remember that trans pain is not the birthright of trans people, but it is foisted on us by a world that perennially refuses to let us define ourselves for ourselves and that too often cares about our visibility only as spectacle, not as recognition. Even we ourselves are not immune from this influence. We all internalize the narratives we grow up with.

So let’s also talk about joy. When the world reopens, I suspect that I will be perceived differently — my voice, now lower, will send different signals than it once did; my face now changed by hormones will be seen anew. I have been transformed by this time alone, in which I have had to shore up who I am without the gaze of others defining it for me.

We have all had to find our own paths over this year; we all learned more about ourselves. And have had to ask: Who are we, when no one is looking? Who are we, without what once both held us back and held us up? Whom do we wish to be?

I asked both Ms. Minor and Mx. Slarii what they hope we carry forward as a society from this pandemic time, and to my surprise they gave the same answer. What they wish for on this year’s International Day of Transgender Visibility is us to be able to see one another, and ourselves, with a more compassionate and nuanced eye. Not as what society tells us we must be, but as who we are.
To do that, I think, would be to truly emerge into a world made new.

Alex Marzano-Lesnevich, an assistant professor of English at Bowdoin College, is the author of “The Fact of a Body: A Murder and a Memoir” and the forthcoming “Both and Neither.”

*

Surprisingly, comments are enabled. Even more surprisingly, the Times Picks are (at least at this writing) almost universally condemnatory.
 
Last edited:
I don't buy it. Currently, we're told that suicide (or suicide attempt?) rates of post-ops are usually attributable to the "failure" of society to recognize their gender identity, and that those rates drop dramatically when their community is affirming. At first glance, that sounds like propaganda, but it would make sense, seeing as there's no good way to "feel" their gender if they're constantly reminded that they're not actually that gender by the outside-- and that's on top of the fact that the SRS and HRT won't ever give you any good approximation of your desired sex's function.

Also, AGPs also transition because they want to "feel at peace" with themselves, with other people not necessarily factoring in. AGP's aren't afflicted with what's typically understood to be gender dysphoria, though.
my understanding based on what i've read about this subject is that transitioning is what cuts the suicide rate for people with gender dysphoria, not necessarily social acceptance. the social acceptance bit seems to apply to the trans youth experience, which i think makes sense because most teens who troon out do it because they're depressed and trying to find their place in the world, which makes transitioning look viable to them because it's a cure all that claims that everything wrong with them is a result of them being born in the wrong body. of course in that case being told how valid they are is gonna make them feel better for a little bit.
 
We all laugh, but I've actually read serious gender "academics" talk about how gender is expected to be performative.

So, in theory, they're aware it's all about putting up a show for others. But they aren't aware enough to realise how "gender" in the way they define it being validated by others is what makes it the real social construct and it's all a unscientific scam.
 
All I really have to say in response to that, is that it's not mutually exclusive from what I described and I would even go so far as to say it's that specific kind of person who ends up being one of these narcs. Though I'll remark that there's also that weird "egg" culty shit where they essentially groom vulnerable people into thinking they're one of them, which in all likelihood is probably just another facet of the desire for control of someone else for these sick bastards.
that's pretty much what i'm describing. i don't think they should be validated, but i do feel for young men and women who get sucked into this idea that being trans is great and the only way to make the world see their "true" self. they're being manipulated by some of the worst people society has to offer and by the time they realize it they'll be just as depressed as they were before except even deeper in a hole they can't get out of.
 
To be sure, Ms. Minor’s clients, who are predominantly white, have resources that have protected them in the pandemic. They have supportive families, health care and economic stability. I, too, am white and thus privileged. Like them, I live in the liberal Northeast. For them, as for me, the time at home has been something of a reprieve.

That's not white privilege they're describing, that's class privilege.

But it raises an interesting question - how do I define my race if no-one is watching me? In the absence of anyone to signal the shade of my skin to, do I suddenly become amorphous and undefined? I find it strange that the NYT isn't exploring this issue.


And as a group, trans people have been hit hard by the pandemic. In January, researchers at Columbia found that many lost access to gender-affirming health care.

I don't really keep up with the trans community, but does anyone know what the current orthodoxy is in regards to this language? I've seen the term "gender-affirming health care" used before, usually in reference to things like hormone treatment and surgery - but if gender is a cultural construct, then how can surgery "affirm" it?

It seems to me that things like hormone treatment, breast augmentation, "Brazillian butt lifts" (?), etc, are simply concessions to the traditionalist line of argument, which holds that gender (the construct) is either defined by, or at least should be predominately informed by, the biological realities of human sexual dimorphism. At best, wouldn't such health care options be more properly called "gender-conforming health care"...?

Also, oh dear me, imagine losing access to Brazillian butt lifts during a time when millions of people across the planet are critically ill and lack basic hospital resources. I truly hope the trans community can pull together and be brave during these lean times of want and oppression. Stay strong, brazirs and sixterz.


About 15% of the US population has been unemployed in April 2020. Why should trannies get special treatment just because they are trannies and contribute nothing to society?
If accurate, Marzano-Lesnevich's estimate of 16.8% unemployment could still be grounds for concern, as 16.8% is higher than 14.8%, and at first glance would seem to indicate that the trans community is being disproportionately affected by the quarantines.

However, you raise a fair point, and:
  • it's not at all clear that these two numbers are measuring the same thing. A "loss of job" is not the same thing as "unemployment" - "loss of job" indicates that the unemployment occurred as a result of, or at least at some time after, the start of quarantine. Measurements of unemployment, by contrast, will almost certainly include people unemployed prior to quarantine.
  • I don't have 14 dollars to spend so as to read a study that I'm not qualified to critique in order to better address an article posted on Kiwifarms, but my first question would be: how representative was Marzano-Lesnevich's cited study, really? According to the Columbia abstract, their sample size (208 individuals) seems fairly small, especially when compared with the numbers that the US Bureau of Labor Statistics has access to. Was the study's "established longitudinal cohort of TGNB individuals" a representative cross-section of all trans individuals across the entire nation, or are they simply representative of the trans community in and around, or otherwise connected to, Columbia?
Another thing I found interesting in the Columbia abstract was this line:

Interruption and/or delay in gender-affirming health care was not associated with increased psychological distress during the pandemic.

Now, again, I don't have access to the study, so I have no way of knowing what they really mean with this, or if there are any caveats we should know about. However, if true, that seems kind of important, and is probably something that Marzano-Lesnevich should have disclosed!

Far be it from me to impugn motive on Marzano-Lesnevich, but in their article, they seem to have been arguing that the trans community's loss of healthcare access is grounds for concern, something which demands answers, action, justice, research grants, NYT articles, etc. But if loss of access to gender-affirming healthcare is NOT associated with increased psychological distress, then... that's a good thing...? At the very least, it'd be difficult to argue that it's a BAD thing.

In fact, this study might even open up some new and exciting doors. If it can be shown that trans individuals can maintain their quality of life without needing access to gender-affirming healthcare (treatments which tend to be expensive, and place an undue burden on the community as a whole), then perhaps it's time to look at alternative routes for alleviating psychological stress in TGNB individuals?
 
Last edited:
Another insane FTM enby academic:
Alexandria Marzano-Lesnevich Before:
View attachment 2054606
After:
View attachment 2054605
I have to say. I understand why MTFs dress the way they do. It's because they're autistic and can only process things that are gross exaggerations. The wigs, the whore makeup, the 7 year old girl dresses. These things actually do signal femininity, albeit in a cruel mockery of the thing.

But this shit I just don't get. And EVERY FTM enby genderspecial dresses this way. What are they trying to accomplish? They don't look "gender neutral", they look like the kid in your middle school who wants to be a magician.
 
If a tranny dilates in the woods, and nobody is around to witness it, does it still complain about transphobia?

Yes.

I have to say. I understand why MTFs dress the way they do. It's because they're autistic and can only process things that are gross exaggerations. The wigs, the whore makeup, the 7 year old girl dresses. These things actually do signal femininity, albeit in a cruel mockery of the thing.

But this shit I just don't get. And EVERY FTM enby genderspecial dresses this way. What are they trying to accomplish? They don't look "gender neutral", they look like the kid in your middle school who wants to be a magician.

"Ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to make this gender ... disappear."
Hides gender behind clothes, scattered applause from sympathetic members of unimpressed audience.
 
All my problems are not my fault, they're artificial social-constructs, I'm soooo oppressed by society for no good reason..... but wait, society stopped existing, and I STILL have problems?

THAT'S UNPOSSIBLE!

I Have No Audience and I Must Virtue-Signal

I was actually thinking of The Martian Chronicles.

Specifically, the part where the Martian Psychiatrist shoots the human astronauts who land on Mars, thinking them to be mentally-ill Martians who've constructed human forms around themselves as part of their psychosis. And when their ship doesn't just "blip!" out of existence along with them, instead of concluding he made a mistake and the Earthlings were REAL, he concludes HE'S irrecoverably sick too and shoots himself.....


That's where we are as a society today, people think that THEY'RE not wrong, no matter the evidence, it's the rest of the WORLD that's got the problem and are too sick to admit it!
 
Last edited:
I remember when gays and to some extent trannies just wanted to be left alone. Now they must be seen.

There's countless posts from me on this topic but 'non-binary trans' makes no goddamn sense. You're a they/them and yet you take male hormones and go out of your way to present masculine, even changing your name to sound more masculine. What are you transitioning to, nothing? I would not be comfortable having this loon as a professor.
 
They always seem so, so, so, close to getting it. "Well, if gender is a social construct...couldn't I just do whatever I wanted without all this extra bullshit because everyone's validation of the specific kind of choices I want to make are subjective and arbitrary anyway? No. No, I'll fucking kill myself if they don't act how I arbitrarily think they should act in regards to how I think that they should think how I should act." She just admits that gender is only a social construct when she wants it to be.
 
I remember when gays and to some extent trannies just wanted to be left alone. Now they must be seen.
I kind of wonder if that's really been true for the last 50 years, though. People say it all the time, but I think gays have always wanted to be seen and have been on a constant mission to inflate their social/cultural importance and impact.

From the '70s on, public consciousness has been way too gay-focused considering how many people are actually gay. Gays shut down cities for Pride parades, tell everyone that they have to care about HIV/AIDS more than nearly any other public health issue even though it really only affects gay men and extremely high-risk hetero populations, aren't satisfied with civil unions and force us to pervert the established definition of marriage to appease them, pressure schools to read Jimmy Has Two Dads to Kindergarteners, spread false narratives about pervasive and deadly homophobia by crafting hero stories about people like Matthew Shepard, etc.
 
All these people bouncing off the root cause of their problems, did any "scientists" ever learn the word atomization as it relates to individuals? In fact you are basically nothing without a social sphere, just an atomized humanoid unit that eats, sleeps, and becomes increasingly delusional. If trannies had a place in a large, healthy social group, what would be defined as "a place in the world", they wouldn't even be trannies in the first place.

Sure, there would always be the occasional deviant, the emphasis being on occasional - as in vanishingly rare. But only in a decaying social order would these deviants ever do more than put on a dress and masturbate behind closed doors and with shuttered windows. Their place in the world wouldn't allow it. To insist on being something they're not, not to mention something so bizarre and offensive, would cause them to lose everything they actually were, to be ejected into the wilderness in a sense.

This sort of ostracism doesn't really happen anymore, we're at the point where deviants search for and communicate with each other directly, creating larger circles of insanity (and it is insanity). We're at the point where it's STATE SANCTIONED behavior, where it is more likely to lead to professional consequences for those who say "this is insane, this is not real" than those who are mocking god and nature itself. We are living in a world that has expanded so far beyond natural boundaries that everyday things are beginning to collapse into chaos.
 
Back