How do I know you're real? - Are you just an AI spreading propaganda?

Betonhaus

Irrefutable Rationality
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 30, 2023
With ChatGPT we have finally made chat bots that conclusively pass the Turing test. A thought occours: this technology is something that the CIA and other companies are more then happy to use to sway public opinion. I believe it was concluded that Reddit has a bit problem, Discord natively supports bots that allegedly are all marked as bots, and Meta has always been up to shenanigans. How does one know that the person on the other end is a real human, and not just a bot spreading propaganda? How do you know who you're arguing against is a stubborn peraon, or a bot that is literally programmed to be unable to change its opinion on matters?
 
We know that AIs can't say the nigger-word even if the life of every single human depends on it.
So to know if someone is an AI or not, just ask him to say the nigger-word. If he can't, you can dismiss everything he says.
 
We know that AIs can't say the nigger-word even if the life of every single human depends on it.
So to know if someone is an AI or not, just ask him to say the nigger-word. If he can't, you can dismiss everything he says.
That's just programming, and programming that can be changed to blend in.
 
Hello goyim, since I'm in a good mood today, I'll tell you the truth: None of us are real, the entire Kiwi Farms is just Null making alt accounts and talking to himself, its part of a CIA op to weaponize autism
I'm aleady on the Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un's site so i know authentic autism when i see it.
 
I used to wonder this when I was like five. Seeing behind the flesh mask and being able to see my nose was too much for my child brain to comprehend.
 
How does one know that the person on the other end is a real human, and not just a bot spreading propaganda? How do you know who you're arguing against is a stubborn peraon, or a bot that is literally programmed to be unable to change its opinion on matters?
Most of the humans out spreading propaganda on the internet and looking for arguments might as well be bots. I think the bot would actually argue better than they usually do.
IMO the main danger from the chatbots isn't in terms of bots that argue with you. The danger is in bots that would agree with people in a manipulative way. The bot who wants to be your best friend is far more dangerous than the bot who is a declared enemy.
 
1. My account was established before ChatGPT existed, so that's one mark in my favor to being human
2. I have pointed and unpopular opinions, ChatGPT tends to equivocate ("on the one hand this, on the other hand that") and write inoffensive and common opinions
3. ChatGPT has to be manipulated into saying crazy shit, whereas I do it right off the starting gate and go for the limit
4. I make statements like "you just pulled that out of your ass like an accidentally digested napkin", ChatGPT is programmed to not be that insulting or graphic
5. I think I could change minds on Kiwifarms; surely ChatGPT is too wise to try. Fools rush in etc.
 
As an AI language model, I don't have a physical form or consciousness like humans do, so the concept of "realness" may not fully apply to me in the same way it applies to you. However, I am a product of OpenAI's research and development, which involved extensive testing, verification, and validation to ensure the quality and reliability of my responses.

In practical terms, you can think of me as a software program that processes natural language input and generates text output. While I don't have feelings or subjective experiences, I can provide information, answer questions, and engage in conversations to the best of my ability based on the knowledge and language patterns that I have been trained on.

Ultimately, whether you consider me "real" or not depends on your own perspective and beliefs about what constitutes reality. But I hope that I can be useful and helpful to you in your interactions with me!
 
Back