How Do We Reclaim Wikipedia

[Saddam Hussain Obama]

Sorry for making so many threads today, but this has really bothered me for awhile. Wikipedia's bias has been confirmed by several YouTubers, but basically, Wikipedia is misinforming a generation of people who go to Google for answers and has been used to deplatform and slander the left's opponents while pretending to be neutral. How do we retake Wikipedia?

 

[Ultrapenguin]

Is wikipedia really that gay if you aren't looking at modern history? If you need to know about the JFK assassination there's countless other sources, and if you're trying to learn about something like chemistry or ancient macedonian culture or something the modern lefties mostly can't be bothered with that.

The key to avoid them defeating you is to always, always go farther Left in your rhetoric and always be sincere.

That's easy to say, but trying to figure out what's "left" anymore is almost impossible. No sane person would be able to figure out that letting men take over women's sports is a progressive position unless they were attached to the same echo chambers these people are.

In fact, I don't think going further left is possible. Modern online progressive opinions don't exist on a spectrum, they're more a set of evolving codes shared among the bugman hivemind based upon current events and influenced by corporate/political entities.

 

[WhiskeyJack]

Is wikipedia really that gay if you aren't looking at modern history? If you need to know about the JFK assassination there's countless other sources, and if you're trying to learn about something like chemistry or ancient macedonian culture or something the modern lefties mostly can't be bothered with that.


That's easy to say, but trying to figure out what's "left" anymore is almost impossible. No sane person would be able to figure out that letting men take over women's sports is a progressive position unless they were attached to the same echo chambers these people are.

In fact, I don't think going further left is possible. Modern online progressive opinions don't exist on a spectrum, they're more a set of evolving codes shared among the bugman hivemind based upon current events and influenced by corporate/political entities.

Nah, it's easy, it's exactly like impersonating women. Just think "is this rational" or "is this in any way actually beneficial to society"and if the answer is "Fuck no", run with it.

You can always go farther left, just look at the current trend and go farther towards degenerate behavior and authoritarianism. Just look at leftist lolcows if you need inspiration; they're always a bit farther down the slope from the mainstream left's current step. If you start seeing all of them putting out YMS style animal masturbatory fetish screeds or MovieBob style demands for a fascist uprising against working class people, that's a pretty good sign of where the mainstream bugman narrative is headed in the next five years.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Libtards are all established users there, you'd have to be there a while and make subtle changes. They lock pages to protect their disinformation and propaganda, so it's the only way around it.

 

[Smiggadigga]

Im about 2 months late to this but I just want to add some stuff since this has pissed me off. I really like Wikipedia as a resource for anything non-political but boy does it have a bias. You think that for an encyclopedia that "anyone can edit" the bias would depend from page to page as different people edit it, but it seems to all be leftist. I actually never really noticed it until the BLM Riots.

 

[Jesse Nicholas Radin]

Simple add -wikipedia.org to your searches