- Joined
- May 15, 2020
I always hear stuff about how even "poor" first-worlders have it really good by global standards. Is that actually true, or is it hyperbole? I mean obviously the typical thirdie can't consoom nearly as much, but it seems like that's NBD as long as you're living in a more or less functional society.
The reason I ask is that I read this essay a while ago, titled "What's So Bad about Being Poor" by Charles Murray. His basic argument was that being first-world poor sucks not because of an inability to buy things, but because you inhabit a social milieu made entirely of people who are too retarded/criminal to earn a decent living, which is otherwise pretty easy to do in America. Therefore, even if poor Americans still have it pretty good in material terms, an urban ghetto is still a worse place to live than some backwater farming town in Southeast Asia or something.
It's an interesting theory, but I don't totally buy it. Are there any kiwis in shithole countries that can weigh in?
The reason I ask is that I read this essay a while ago, titled "What's So Bad about Being Poor" by Charles Murray. His basic argument was that being first-world poor sucks not because of an inability to buy things, but because you inhabit a social milieu made entirely of people who are too retarded/criminal to earn a decent living, which is otherwise pretty easy to do in America. Therefore, even if poor Americans still have it pretty good in material terms, an urban ghetto is still a worse place to live than some backwater farming town in Southeast Asia or something.
It's an interesting theory, but I don't totally buy it. Are there any kiwis in shithole countries that can weigh in?