Opinion How in God's name are the Democrats still losing — even after Jan. 6 hearings and Roe?

Link (Archive)

How in God's name are the Democrats still losing — even after Jan. 6 hearings and Roe?​

It's going to be a long, hot summer — and I'm not just talking about the weather.

Take a handful of hallucinogens, sedatives and edibles, wash them down with a healthy amount of your favorite liquor during a backyard barbecue with people you love, some you barely know and others you can't stand, and you'll approximate the political climate in the United States today on the eve of the midterm elections.

The summer of 2022 is hot and furious. We are dealing with a world literally on fire due to climate change. We are dealing with a worldmetaphorically on fire with a continuing war in Ukraine. We are dealing with monkeypox, a continuing pandemic, haters, baiters, ravenous idiots, seditionists, misogynists, racists, pedophiles, gun-toting good Samaritans, mass shootings, religious zealots, the Jan. 6 hearings, Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump and infrastructure problems. In the words of Hedley Lamarr: "cutthroats, murderers, bounty hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shit-kickers and Methodists."

Gee, "Blazing Saddles" seems a little dated, doesn't it? Or, perhaps more to the point, our culture has irrevocably changed and that change is readily apparent in our pop culture. Gone is the era dominated by "Happy Days." That's been replaced by "Stranger Things." Gone are the days of "Blazing Saddles." Say hello to the days of "Hacks." See? Great comedy is still being done.

Anyway, life as we know it on the planet is a mess, and if you're hoping to get it cleaned up any time soon, it's obvious we have to take a hint from Bertrand Russell, who famously said in a 1959 interview that "if we are to live together and not to die together we must learn a kind of charity and a kind of tolerance, which is absolutely vital to the continuation of human life on this planet."

Furthermore, to succeed we must be guided by the facts, and what those facts bear out as opposed to what we wish to believe. Look only and solely at the facts. Love is wise. Hatred is foolish. At least according to Russell, the author of "Why I Am Not a Christian." Today he might face criminal charges for that essay in certain geographic locales in this country and others.

Those American locales are the same ones H.L. Mencken described as harboring devotees of William Jennings Bryan, in some ways the early 20th-century version of Donald Trump. Mencken described Bryan as a man who "liked people who sweated freely, and were not debauched by the refinements of the toilet." The only difference today is that Trump doesn't actually like those people, but will get their votes as he also sells them commemorative towels, MAGA hats, T-shirts and other swag.

Today's Republican Party is thus reduced to a cartoon caricature of itself. Most of those capable of cogent thought have long fled. Only a few brave or foolish souls hoping for the "good ol' days" of the Grand Old Party yet remain. As a former Republican strategist told me, "I didn't leave the party. The party left me. It has no agenda, just rage and no leader — just Donald Trump. There is no goal in mind other than wielding power against anyone the party deems as an enemy."

Hey, he said it. I just agree.

The current GOP implosion is the single most significant event in the modern political arena. As it further condenses into a political black hole, the party's dwindling numbers continue to find new basements to raid in a never-ending, unethical quest for total power. The rats have long fled the sinking ship. All that remains are the leeches.

With that in mind, you'd think the Democrats would be killing it going into the midterms. But most pundits, many Democratic strategists, members of Congress and some privately at the White House think otherwise. At best, some of these people believe the Democrats could hold on to the Senate while losing the House. The worst case scenario? Democrats lose both the House and the Senate while being treed by an angry Kodiak bear fleeing a catastrophic climate-induced wildfire.

Only the recent reversal of Roe v. Wade, a 50-year-old precedent recognizing a fundamental constitutional right, may have given the Democrats a fighting chance to hold onto both houses of Congress. And now, secretly, every Democrat and many former Republicans have felt the spark of a New Hope: the possibility of increasing the Democratic majority in the Senate enough to eliminate the filibuster rule. Why the sudden change of mood? It isn't exactly the plans to the Death Star.

The Roe v. Wade debacle threatens to produce a galvanized voting bloc of women from across the socioeconomic spectrum that could make such an outcome possible.

If that happens, it won't be the first time women of all colors have had to clean up a problem caused by a bunch of self-indulgent men.

Suddenly, every Democrat feels a New Hope: the possibility of increasing the Senate majority enough to eliminate the filibuster. If that happens, it'll be a galvanized voting bloc of women that makes it so.

But the Democrats have to overcome their natural desire to eat their own or snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. That is the party's continuing curse. In this environment, the zero-sum game of politics, oddly enough conjured up by the shriveled mind of onetime GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich, holds sway in certain factions of the Democratic Party. "My way or the highway" isn't just a rant from a stifling parent. It is a battle cry among some Democrats — and among all Republicans. It makes building a consensus increasingly difficult.

"I spent most of my career in the federal government, and I'm very practical about what can get done even on the best days," Democratic strategist Julie Zebrak explained. "I do think Democrats putting forth candidates who create false expectations and who have views that aren't realistic is a problem. For the midterms, we need to put forth candidates who can beat the Republicans, and I'm not sure that's always who we chose."

Each party used to understand that concept. Today, it is anathema to true believers everywhere. But the real problem, according to strategists on both sides of the aisle, is renewed voter apathy. People are tired of Trump. People are tired of Biden. People are tired of broken promises and unattainable goals. "If they become frustrated and don't turn out to vote, everyone loses," Zebrak warned.

Fifty years after women got the right to vote, Roe v. Wade solidified a basic constitutional right for all women. Fifty years later, it was lost. What if 50 years after women got the right to vote, they then lost that right? Can anyone seriously imagine that? Unfortunately, today you can. So, there is no doubt a great deal of frustration both with politics and inpolitics today.

The bright spot for the Democrats, the non-Trump Republicans and the American people has been the Jan. 6 hearings — which will wrap up (at least for now) in primetime splendor on Thursday night. The messaging coming from these hearings has been clear and concise. Those who engineered its presentation have made sure it is a fair and factual representation of the ongoing coup conducted by Donald Trump, which still threatens this country. It has been precedent-setting. It's been enlightening, frightening and overwhelming. Part of that is due to how these hearings have been produced.

If the Democrats can learn from the hearings and apply those lessons in messaging to the campaigns for the midterms — while remembering to pick candidates who can actually win a general election (two really big ifs) — the Democrats mightthrive this fall. Might.

But cutting through the clatter in a typical news day remains a tool the Democrats don't readily have available. Issues? Ideas? Stances? Those they have in abundance. But only the Republicans have a handle on how to energize their base, through fear and nostalgia for a time that never really existed. That cuts through everything. You don't have to actually like a Republican. Hell, apparently few people really do — even those who vote for them. The Republicans are just really good at scaring the shit out of a large number of American voters, while placing eternal blame on the Democrats.

Meanwhile, the public is overwrought, with all the worries of a Mad magazine parody written by Stephen King. Yeah, it's good viewing, and better reading, but it's a tough way to spend your day.

After the Jan. 6 hearings close, and following the midterm elections, the course for this country will be set, perhaps for a generation to come.

We'd all better make sure it's a float trip we can take together.
 
It is a little astounding how neither the Jan 6 hearings nor Roe have helped Dems. They weren't able to present anything whatsoever at the hearings to make Trump look bad and even ended up making him look better by suggesting he was eager to go and be with his supporters. One of the biggest criticisms against Trump was the idea he wasn't joining them and the Dems demolished it, to Trump's benefit.

Then with Roe the Dems couldn't even get marches going in cities around the country the way they could for BLM criminals. They'd burn cars over killers being killed, but abortion can't even get people to walk down a city street. Absurdly low energy. They could have done like they did in the past and brought in a few mentally ill people to fight at some public events with right wingers, but instead they're largely sitting on their hands.

They should have been able to put on some kind of show to rile up the masses, but have failed miserably at it to the point they've instead made their opponents look better.
 
William Jennings Bryan. was a great guy and progrsssive for his time.. He was was aganist american imperialism and resgined in 1915 after realizing Willson intetention to bring American into the great war. He also fought for dying agricultural class with his cross of gold speech. Yet because he was christan and against teaching evolution he gets shit on.
He was also part of the scopes monkey trial. Though the play Inherit the Wind made him out to be an asshole.
 
In the early 1970s Nixon faced inflation (4-11%), especially in food prices, partly due to the monetary policy pursued in the five year before then and partly due to his decision to sell wheat and grains to the USSR on credit. He survived politically by the use of price controls, but was pummeled by the media for years, with stories about veterans eating cat food, workers stealing meat from supermarkets, and thieves hijacking meat trucks as if they were carrying gold ingots being regularly aired in indictment of his failure. Nixon eventually had to defend himself in front of the media, admitting the severity of the situation and asking Congress to cooperate with him on a 5 billion dollar cut in government spending. His presidency is widely considered one of the worst in America's postwar years, and before Watergate, the food prices were definitely the source of the dissatisfaction of his voter base.

Biden is facing 9% inflation in the US and is literally saying that it's not as bad as it sounds, and if it's bad it's because of Putin, and the Republicans, and the oil companies, and Covid. Meanwhile, the media publishes puff pieces pretending that fiscal policy can't possibly affect prices, while the Democratic party plays pretend counter-insurgency and Nuremberg trials for boomers.

I'm not saying that the Dems can't possibly make great gains. Americans can choose what to value, and if it's true that abortion ranks higher than food and gas prices for them, great. But would you bet money on that?
 
photo-1588979355313-6711a095465f.jpeg

O4KRNeHU4QVl.gif

Yeah I can't imagine how they're still losing.
 
Even as a britbong who knows nothing about the US I can see why the dems are failing, why can't they?
One of my logical-centric theories is that the Dems rely HEAVILY on quantitative and tangible methods to spread their message. i.e. If we take X action, then we will see Y react in a certain way.

Overall, it's not a terrible concept, but it doesn't take into account every single aspect of the human mind and has it's limits of effectiveness. So they keep doubling down, going harder on shit until the slightly more pragmatic public go "Hrmmm, maybe injecting kids with hormones at the age of 9 or indoctrinating kids with drag show degenerates is absurd".

They have NO idea how to get the genie back in the bottle, so the only option they have is to continue with the original gameplan.

Another analogy that popped into my head with the modern DNC is with the attitude era of wrestling/WCW. The wrestling audience absolutely exploded, due in large part to the more "edgy and mature" storylines. Both companies kept going down that path until the bubble began to deflate.
So how did WCW respond? They kept putting on more and more insane shit to the point that you were basically watching Jerry Springer in wrestling form. WCW quickly died because there was zero recourse back to normalcy and they had sacrificed developing talent outside of the top 5 or so for several years. Unfortunately, now it involves one of two political parties in the US instead of a wrestling company.
 
Does anyone have that clip of the Biden admin being asked on air whether they should hold off on sending billions to Ukraine and being told "we are fighting for a global world order, everyone is going to have to suck it up and take the financial hit".

There is an admin telling citizens to eat shit and put up with it, and people wonder why no one likes them.

"Can you please spend some of that money to help fix the economy"?

"Shut the fuck up you disgusting serf, we are using that money for international business interests, take that financial dick and be happy".
 
"Fifty years after women got the right to vote, Roe v. Wade solidified a basic constitutional right for all women."

WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY do you faggots keep saying this?!

1. There is no constitutional right to abortion.
2. A SCOTUS ruling cannot create a constitutional right out of thin air.
This is why RBG did not like Roe, despite being pro-abortion. Having Roe as the legal linchpin for abortion is circular logic.
 
"We'd all better make sure it's a float trip we can take together."

No.

The Left has tried to starve out the middle class, burned down their businesses, cut off their fuel supplies, maligned them, told them to accept communism, raped their children, and laughed as they did it. The left rigged an election, told middle America they had done so and dared them to do something about it, have openly stated their plans to force citizens to become subjects and abrogate more and more civil rights and liberties to these people...no. Fuck the left, fuck their cartoonish puzzling over why the MagaChuds won't accept their promises of less of everything at higher costs and gulags for those who won't capitulate. I don't hope for an election later this year I hope for massive upheavals. To continue the article writer's boat analogy, if this is a liferaft and I see anyone with an Antifa armband or someone I recognize from the DSA paddling up to get on, I will giggle like a motherfucker while smashing their fingers with a hammer and pushing them back under the waves. It's come to that.
 
It's like I've said before, they've gotten just about everyone they are going to get. The abortion fans and J6 pearl clutchers were voting for them already, and people only switch from Democrat to Republican, not the other way around. This is why they are so desperate to groom children and push the great replacement migration.

Problem is, the children they are grooming aren't going to be voting age for over a decade, and that's assuming that parents don't just stonewall their efforts all over the country. The great replacement is out of the bag now, and no amount of temper tantrums are going to shut people up about it.

So the left is sitting atop a failing base that ultimately depends on how much White liberals are willing to tolerate before switching sides. The more they lose that base, the closer they come to losing everything.
 
Clown World is a world ruled by hedonists. The concepts of temperance, rationality, and delayed gratification are lost on them.

Someone who lives a virtuous life is a walking rebuke to their degeneracy. So they try to discredit it by claiming "everyone who doesn't affirm my behavior must secretly do it themselves!"
That's caused by lacking theory of mind, which is the true definition of an NPC. They literally cannot comprehend that someone might be different from them in some way. If someone claims to be different, they must be lying, because being different is impossible. If someone is proven to be different, the NPC simply becomes angry and incoherent, because they're experiencing the moron equivalent of looking at an IRL tesseract.
 
Back