How many interviews is too many?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

the khat quaffer

so close, yet so far away
kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 27, 2019
Seems like nowadays 3-4 is the minimum.

Any job worth a fuck, there's a pre-screen phone call, an interview, a virtual interview, and an on-site in-person interview. Pre-screen, make sure you're not retarded. First virtual, make sure you're not a h1b curry nigger.

When does it end? How many interviews is too many?

Serious question.

PS: waiting on a hearback for a .. a... virtual interview.

 
Acceptable: quick recruiter or chat + initial interview + whoever is senior/wasn’t able to make the other interview or follow up

Not acceptable; multiple rounds, stupid testing, group testing, testing days.
 
Acceptable: quick recruiter or chat + initial interview + whoever is senior/wasn’t able to make the other interview or follow up

Not acceptable; multiple rounds, stupid testing, group testing, testing days.
I'm...appreciative of what you've said, but unsure of how it applies to my ongoing situation or the situation in general. The (sadly..) Indeed/recruiter model is, maybe we'll hook you up, you're on your own after that.

Indeed is a roll of the dice.
 
Apparently it never used to be like this years ago, just walk into the door, get an interview, if they like you they hire you right there. I wish i was born in the 50's, we are just living off whatever scraps are left
 
I'm...appreciative of what you've said, but unsure of how it applies to my ongoing situation or the situation in general. The (sadly..) Indeed/recruiter model is, maybe we'll hook you up, you're on your own after that.

Indeed is a roll of the dice.
I dislike recruiters. I am I suppose lucky to have a job that’s in demand, so with a couple of decades of experience I can call more shots. It was t like that when I started out - even with a PhD I found it hard to get a foot in the door (graduated into a recession) so I found feel for you.
It is frustrating, and it’s a waste of talent. For a while a few years ago I was one of the people interviewing and it drove me nuts. I had a few people I’d worked with before and I’d passed their cvs along. Not a single one got hired, and instead he gave us utterly useless bastards. I kept pushing and asking why this girl or that guy hadn’t got an interview when they were exactly what we were after (obviously I was recused from actually interviewing them) and the hr answer was ‘not a good fit.’ Which was a total lie.
Hr were never able to justify their picks, and never passed on all cvs for the people who actually know the job to assess.
And that was before the dei stuff so god knows how bad it is now.
 
Maybe I'm just an outlier, but every job I have ever gotten has been only one interview with whoever my boss would be. Every job I have applied for where there were multiple rounds, I never got. And always felt terrible that I wasted so much time on it. Bureaucratic HR waste of time. I guess if they actually really want you, they won't bother making you go through such a terrible process. If I was on the job market again I would try to bypass recruiters entirely if possible.
 
Oh they are meant to be busywork because most jobs have little reason to exist and are filled within the company so it’s basically just yanking your chain just to appear productive. You will be given the run-around I’m afraid.

I don’t know if there is anyway to get a guaranteed job. You would need to get them to sign something in writing, but that is basically an employment contract already.

There are tons of threads in Bidness about how to navigate this hellish labyrinth called the 2025 job market. There has to be one idea that will work. But don’t keep banging your head against the same wall.
 
For a while a few years ago I was one of the people interviewing and it drove me nuts. I had a few people I’d worked with before and I’d passed their cvs along. Not a single one got hired, and instead he gave us utterly useless bastards. I kept pushing and asking why this girl or that guy hadn’t got an interview when they were exactly what we were after (obviously I was recused from actually interviewing them) and the hr answer was ‘not a good fit.’ Which was a total lie.
Hr were never able to justify their picks, and never passed on all cvs for the people who actually know the job to assess.
And that was before the dei stuff so god knows how bad it is now.
images.jpg

I guess if they actually really want you, they won't bother making you go through such a terrible process
Without TMI, I can tell you they want me. Last cuppa careers, they wanted me but didn't know it yet. They still had to go through the motions and do the multiple interviews. It's insane.
 
at least as far as retail or any low skill labor goes, two interviews are excessive, when McDonald’s and Target are that fucking choosy when it comes to who they higher you get the current rising unemployment rates the United States is currently dealing with, not to mention a lot of major corporations won’t even get back to applicants, I honestly think something’s got to give with the current culture, you want people who know what they are doing if they are a computer programmer, but if your hiring a stocker at Target, then not being a drug addict or violent felon should be enough
 
I dislike recruiters. I am I suppose lucky to have a job that’s in demand, so with a couple of decades of experience I can call more shots. It was t like that when I started out - even with a PhD I found it hard to get a foot in the door (graduated into a recession) so I found feel for you.
It is frustrating, and it’s a waste of talent. For a while a few years ago I was one of the people interviewing and it drove me nuts. I had a few people I’d worked with before and I’d passed their cvs along. Not a single one got hired, and instead he gave us utterly useless bastards. I kept pushing and asking why this girl or that guy hadn’t got an interview when they were exactly what we were after (obviously I was recused from actually interviewing them) and the hr answer was ‘not a good fit.’ Which was a total lie.
Hr were never able to justify their picks, and never passed on all cvs for the people who actually know the job to assess.
And that was before the dei stuff so god knows how bad it is now.
I've had positive experiences with recruiters over a 30-year career. Most of my positions after a certain point have been through connections/ someone calling me up to see if I'd want to come and do X, but both when I was in high demand earlier in my career, and later when I'd taken some time away and was thinking yeah, better get back to work, I've gotten multiple and competing job offers through recruiters. Highly industry-specific, maybe.

And DEI is dead in the US.

Anything more than a pre-screening call and one in-person interview is just busywork for them to see if you'll jump through certain hoops.
I guess if they actually really want you, they won't bother making you go through such a terrible process.
Wholly dependent on industry, level, place, immediate past history, and connections. These days, in my world, if it's a company of any size and you don't have a powerful in (or even if you do) you typically have to go through at least some approximation of the full HR process. Again in my world/ level, it's common to have multiple interviews with various levels of people. Sometimes, if your in is strong enough, those are somewhat documentation/ make a good impression/ sanity checks that no one hates you viscerally.

Sometimes. Oftentimes, even if you have an in and are heavily favored, you are still put in competition in many cases, and you can blow it. In my current position, I was favored, but I put my ego aside and jumped through the hoops, took it seriously, and danced for the behavioral panel*, because the competition was a few hundred well-qualified people, many with "ins," and squandering my opportunity would be stupid. And my "in" was the hiring manager, but without a C in front of their name, that guaranteed nothing.

* god, I fucking hate those things. But I will admit it was a good exercise and got me thinking about things in a different way- and to this day I keep notes of how I do things successfully, not just what succeeds.
 
Local/small firm, family owned business, small stores, dept etc: one

Bigger firms, but national: usually two, RH and a panel with the managers

National banking, multinational companies: usually around 3, RH, sectional managers, shareholder managers

Above 3 interviews: save your time, unless is fucking Goldman Sachs or some shit
 
Depends upon the industry and skill level. Low level retail or service industry? One.
Entry level professional work? Two to three, with one always being a technical.
Senior positions, especially upper management? Four, maybe five, but only if a couple of those are informal lunches or dinners.

In general anything more than three is stringing you along for one reason or another.
 
More than one interview and a skill test isn’t a recruitment process, it’s negging. They’re filtering out anyone with any self worth so they can stick it your bum without lube and treat you like the bitch that you are.
 
Interviews? Kek! Try doing 10 shitty IQ test per day for junior positions. One interview should be enough.

They’re filtering out anyone with any self worth so they can stick it your bum without lube and treat you like the bitch that you are.
This, you have to act beta because any hint of not taking shit will make you a "uncooperative". Anyways, once you get in you can start mistreating delegating the other pussies at work to do your job. Before anyone call me a nigger/kike for it, just know that I don't care, I just wanted a paycheck for minimum wear on my body.
 
Last edited:
Four is pushing it for a private sector job.

Edit to add: 5 or 6 for public.

Sometimes they won't even intend to hire you, they just want to hear your ideas.
 
Back
Top Bottom