How many nationalists/neo-Nazis/fascists do we have on here?

[FEETLOAF]

the Founding Fathers viewed the lower classes with contempt

No lmao. Many of them were of common birth. You are taking the requirement for landownership to vote and going full retard with it.

 

[CheezzyMach]

If George Washington was transported to today he'd probably have a stroke due to all the flashing lights. Predicting how men of the past would respond to the present is a lot harder than analyzing how the laws of the past would apply in the present. White Nationalist ideology is overwhelmingly the domain of the lower class in contemporary America, and the Founding Fathers viewed the lower classes with contempt, seeing them as only above niggers by default (and even then, groups like the Irish and Scots-Irish were often seen as, quite literally, white niggers).

Didn't a good number of them want to recreate the British monarchy here too?

Also good job on showing why White Nationalism in America is and always will be a complete joke.

Irish and Italians were treated the same as Mexican immigrants are now for most of the 19th and 20th century. Give it another generation or two and Hispanics will be considered White too.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

No lmao. Many of them were of common birth. You are taking the requirement for landownership to vote and going full retard with it.

"Of common birth"
Most of them were gentry. Monticello isn't exactly the house of a humble farmer. Neither is Mount Vernon.

 

[FEETLOAF]

"Of common birth"
Most of them were gentry. Monticello isn't exactly the house of a humble farmer. Neither is Mount Vernon.

Being rich doesn't make you gentry you stinky merchant.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

U JOO

I accept your admission of defeat.

 

[FEETLOAF]

I accept your admission of defeat.

You are worse than a jew. You are, dare I say it...
middle class

 

[Shovel Mech Pilot]

"if you don't cuck your country for the benefit of foreigners you are a neo nazi" - the op, probably

 

[mr.moon1488]

If George Washington was transported to today he'd probably have a stroke due to all the flashing lights. Predicting how men of the past would respond to the present is a lot harder than analyzing how the laws of the past would apply in the present. White Nationalist ideology is overwhelmingly the domain of the lower class in contemporary America, and the Founding Fathers viewed the lower classes with contempt, seeing them as only above niggers by default (and even then, groups like the Irish and Scots-Irish were often seen as, quite literally, white niggers).

 

[SITHRAK!]

It amazes me how many channers would consider themselves fascists without realizing that an anonymous image board where people can share opinions without repercussions would never be aloud in a fascist state

also if you think your diffrent from another human becuase you have a diffrent ethnicity, your exceptional

You're are an retard and ya'll can't write but badly.

White Nationalist ideology is overwhelmingly the domain of the lower class in contemporary America

Funny, that's not what Critical Race Theory, ANTIFA, BLM, Open Society Foundations, almost all media and academia, the Democratic party and the technocratic elites from Gates to Musk have been telling me.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

View attachment 2012064

I applaud the effort, saved.

Funny, that's not what Critical Race Theory, ANTIFA, BLM, Open Society Foundations, almost all media and academia, the Democratic party and the technocratic elites from Gates to Musk have been telling me.

1. What are they telling you, allegedly. This isn't meaningful engagement, it's just the venting of your spleen.
2. You're automatically a nigger for doubleposting.

 

[FEETLOAF]

I disavow all doubleposters!

 

[Haint]

My last name is very German. It wouldn't matter what my beliefs are. If I ever get into a verbal altercation with a troon or one of "God's Chosen People" it will be very easy to smear me.

In the same boat. As soon as people hear my last name or accent, I am either a Nazi or at a racist redneck

 

[SITHRAK!]

1. What are they telling you, allegedly. This isn't meaningful engagement, it's just the venting of your spleen.
2. You're automatically a nigger for doubleposting.

Fair enough, the doublepost was me going full retard, and you've got me on the spleen thing too, apologies.
The point I was making is that what you're saying is true- people openly espousing WN beliefs tend to skew low, achievement-wise.
But if the current zeitgeist is to be believed, every white person in the US is actively or passively part of a gigantic machine of racial oppression.
And at the same time we also have black people buying huge plots of land in Georgia to make black-only communities.
If whites were to do the same thing I would imagine there would be outrage.
It's all bullshit; forcing together people who don't want to integrate has never worked and will never work.
I don't care if black seperatists or white nationalists or the creepy Rajnishi O'Leary want to create their own communities. I say let them.
I'd like to see an end to divisive racial bullshit being policy, and for people being allowed to live their lives their way.

 

[Poppavalyim Andropoff]

I dont' get the stigma against white nationalists. This country was founded on it and if you want to stick to the constitution then white nationalism would be the way to go.

“White nationalist” has been co opted by knuckle dragging dumbshits with their single digit IQ who want to blame their own retardation & life failure on the niggers & ghews. Hence it’s nigh impossible in 2021 to be a WN without being lumped in with these shitbirds. The irony is if a real 4th Reich popped off these types would be the first to go.

 

[NyQuilninja]

I'm not a White nationalist
I just don't want to be guilted and shamed for not wanting to live around niggers Beaners and other racist foreigners.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

Being rich doesn't make you gentry you stinky merchant.

In the case of Jefferson and Washington (Monticello and Mount Vernon), they were planters, which basically meant part of a social class of idle landlords descended from hereditary aristocrats (in the Old Country) who rule over a population of forced laborers while dividing their time between military service, conspicuous leisure, and intellectual activity.

So in other words, nobility.

 

[FEETLOAF]

In the case of Jefferson and Washington (Monticello and Mount Vernon), they were planters, which basically meant part of a social class of idle landlords descended from hereditary aristocrats (in the Old Country) who rule over a population of forced laborers while dividing their time between military service, conspicuous leisure, and intellectual activity.

So in other words, nobility.

The key part of your post which is incorrect is "descended from hereditary aristocrats," which as far as I am aware wasn't true for either.
Modern people don't generally get this, but you could have a few thousand acres, a castle, and more money than God, and you'd still be a commoner.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

The key part of your post which is incorrect is "descended from hereditary aristocrats," which as far as I am aware wasn't true for either.
Modern people don't generally get this, but you could have a few thousand acres, a castle, and more money than God, and you'd still be a commoner.

I’m not sure about either of them as individuals, but planters as a social class tended to be descended from second sons of Barbadian and English gentry.

unlike actual nobility being a planter was not a legal classification nor was it hereditary, instead being an informal status you got by owning slaves and property (particularly on a large scale). But it was a rigid enough social system that had a pressure to assimilate to its culture. Being a planter in the South entailed more, socially, than just being a rich man in America does nowadays.

So I don’t know about their individual ancestries, but even so they were drawn from a class that had a collective sense of quasi-noble status, as set apart from the “yeomanry” and the slaves.

 

[FEETLOAF]

I’m not sure about either of them as individuals, but planters as a social class tended to be descended from second sons of Barbadian and English gentry.

unlike actual nobility being a planter was not a legal classification nor was it hereditary, instead being an informal status you got by owning slaves and property (particularly on a large scale). But it was a rigid enough social system that had a pressure to assimilate to its culture. Being a planter in the South entailed more, socially, than just being a rich man in America does nowadays.

So I don’t know about their individual ancestries, but even so they were drawn from a class that had a collective sense of quasi-noble status, as set apart from the “yeomanry” and the slaves.

Yes! And that's what the American founders wanted. Their ideal was a land of independent farmers, independent craftsmen, independent tradesmen, etc. While some (very stinky and homosexual) founding fathers were gentry and wanted to create an American gentry, the majority of them and the hegemonic position was that noblemen are fags and we hate em.

 

[KimCoppolaAficionado]

Yes! And that's what the American founders wanted. Their ideal was a land of independent farmers, independent craftsmen, independent tradesmen, etc. While some (very stinky and homosexual) founding fathers were gentry and wanted to create an American gentry, the majority of them and the hegemonic position was that noblemen are fags and we hate em.

Also, the common people are fags and we hate them. Most of the FF saw the average American as unworthy to govern themselves, hence their original voting laws concentrating power within the planter and mercantile ("stinky merchant") classes.
I don't know where the hell you got this idea that the FF were fans of the dirt-poor, but they weren't. They were fans of the wealthy, landed, and literate classes they came from. The fact they substituted a self-justified belief that "anyone can be successful if they just try hard enough (so if you're poor, it means you lack moral character)" for the previous Great Chain of Being does not divorce them from their elitist sentiment.