How, when and why did you become a furry? - FURRIES ONLY POST! NO NORMIES ALLOWED!

Wolfmanfur pink triangle?

  • Yes

    Votes: 153 56.5%
  • Yes but in the middle

    Votes: 108 39.9%
  • No (incorrect option)

    Votes: 10 3.7%

  • Total voters
    271
You truly are the daftest motherfucker on this planet.
Also <3 got aliased to heart_symbol. You don't use e6 of course you wouldn't know.
You're trying to imply with this link that the e6 admins remove this tag because they are biased, yet you fail to realize that the tag doesn't exist in an official capacity and that genuine calls to violence would most likely be reported and met with a ban anyhow. So this "political bias" claim still falls apart.

So I don't keep track of every single change on a site that is mostly used by porn addicts, sue me. It's actually really weird you remember very recent changes to "<3" off the top of your head and think it's an own.
 
According to my research, the e621 admins primarily ban people for powerleveling, particularly posts like "I wish that were me" when not in a joking manner. Thats the most common ban reason I've seen. The bullshit bans happen but they're relatively rare by comparison.
You made a shitty job at your "research" and the bullshit bans are the norm there. It really shows that you don't actually know shit about e621 and you make up bullshit claims like that. You don't even talk on behalf of people who actually use e621 or being regular there.

By the way banning people for replies like "I wish that were me" is moronic, especially when they allows lots of replies that are actually abusive. Also we talk about same site that allows "art" that glorify real life terrorist organizations like ANTIFA and BLM and allows lots of fucked up fetishes but posting a drawing of Cream the Rabbit saying the N-word "is crossing the line" and it's instant ban.
 
Tags are translated to english, so what I meant by "I don't pay attention to tags" I meant it literally. The only tags I care about are tags for fetishes. This is how I discover most of the stuff on pixiv, but once I'm on an image I don't pay attention to tags anymore because odds are 99% of them are tags of things I won't care about.

Furthermore, fetish art isn't the same thing as lolicon shotacon, let alone pedo-pornography with real children in it. go to baraag and see the difference for yourself
hey null, would you mind sending the email of this faggot in here.
there could be a chance that he used a PERSONAL e-mail that got leaked in MULTIPLE DATABREACHES(potentially with his other personal info).
i consider myself an OSINT god.
 
You realize they now delete the posts/comments that violate the rules now instead of just posting "USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS COMMENT" underneath the comment, right? As for tagging, wolfmanfur was specifically banned for being involved in a political tag war. Adding retarded tags like "call for violence" To a flag burning image.
Interesting that he would do that.
On a zoophile flag burning image.
1726573855296.png
As though he finds it threatening.
But why would a non-zoo find it threatening?
We can't see the comments he left on here since they were deleted but I'm pretty sure they had to do with that disruptive behavior policy.
I'm pleasantly surprised that e621 allows an art that mocks zoophiles. If you did the same to furaffinity, you would get instant ban. And I'll agree with you: defending zoophiles is suspicious. And just like the art says: zoophiles aren't welcome to anthro animals communities. Unfortunately most furry communities are run by zoophiles and they defend zoophiles. Which is one of the reasons I refuse associating with the furry fandom, especially since I only like the art (NSFW one included) and I'm not fan of the furry fandom culture (fursuits, fursonas, furcons, child molesting, animal abuse, shoving BDSM lifestyle and LGBT agenda to everyone's face yada yada yada).
 
Screenshot 2024-09-17 at 16.24.55.png
(though without a proper email for this kiwifarms account i cannot actually find any leaks related to our @Wolfmanfur)
 
It's been used on other posts you know and I added the tag because I didn't want to see this garbage on my furry porn website.
"Your" site? You own e621? And by "garbage" you mean the art that mocks zoophiles at the furry fandom?
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Glowie
You truly are the daftest motherfucker on this planet.
Also <3 got aliased to heart_symbol. You don't use e6 of course you wouldn't know.
I've checked the art that you have tagged with "call for violence" and three of them indeed promote real life violence against "nazis" (aka everyone that leftists disagree with) and "transphobes" (aka people who don't want creepy pedo transgenders to molest minors):

The "Let's burn the Quran" however doesn't promotes violence.
 
You don't even talk on behalf of people who actually use e621 or being regular there.
Multiple of my past profile pictures here were found on the e926 mirror. I also have to look into these things as I frequently lurk the Animal Control board.

especially when they allows lots of replies that are actually abusive
Archive link or you're bullshitting.

Also we talk about same site that allows "art" that glorify real life terrorist organizations like ANTIFA and BLM and allows lots of fucked up fetishes but posting a drawing of Cream the Rabbit saying the N-word "is crossing the line" and it's instant ban.
Archive link or you're bullshitting. Also:

I've checked the art that you have tagged with "call for violence" and three of them indeed promote real life violence against "nazis" (aka everyone that leftists disagree with) and "transphobes" (aka people who don't want creepy pedo transgenders to molest minors):
https://e621.net/posts/4163511
As we have already established at least twice, call_for_violence is not even a tag. He attempted to add it to multiple posts even after the staff told him it was not valid. This is the reason it was removed. Also for the love of god quit fucking double posting.

Interesting how you flip around to criticizing Wolfmanfur the moment you're accused of being a sock account, by the way.
 
I'm pleasantly surprised that e621 allows an art that mocks zoophiles. If you did the same to furaffinity, you would get instant ban. And I'll agree with you: defending zoophiles is suspicious. And just like the art says: zoophiles aren't welcome to anthro animals communities. Unfortunately most furry communities are run by zoophiles and they defend zoophiles. Which is one of the reasons I refuse associating with the furry fandom, especially since I only like the art (NSFW one included) and I'm not fan of the furry fandom culture (fursuits, fursonas, furcons, child molesting, animal abuse, shoving BDSM lifestyle and LGBT agenda to everyone's face yada yada yada).
Yet here you are defending a fucking shit fetish cubfur and his, your fandom is filled with faggots and "based" groups starting from burned furs. You're a cubfur yourself.
 
I've checked the art that you have tagged with "call for violence" and three of them indeed promote real life violence against "nazis" (aka everyone that leftists disagree with) and "transphobes" (aka people who don't want creepy pedo transgenders to molest minors):

The "Let's burn the Quran" however doesn't promotes violence.
Even if you press that "ignore" button on us, don't forget, you're here on this website forever.
 
Back