https://archive.fo/LN5fV
Argument is basically "If white men couldn't vote, then recent referendums and elections would have outcomes that I personally would like more. Therefore, they should be disenfranchised."
Oh, and she is an MA student in Philosophy.
EDIT - Turns out it was a troll. But HuffPo initially defended publishing this and called it "basic feminist analysis" in response to criticism before investigating and discovering and admitting that the author was a troll.
Argument is basically "If white men couldn't vote, then recent referendums and elections would have outcomes that I personally would like more. Therefore, they should be disenfranchised."
Oh, and she is an MA student in Philosophy.
EDIT - Turns out it was a troll. But HuffPo initially defended publishing this and called it "basic feminist analysis" in response to criticism before investigating and discovering and admitting that the author was a troll.
Last edited: